<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo, the gadget guide. So much in love with shiny new toys, it's unnatural.]]></description>
				        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Famous Paintings Reproduced In Coffee [Art] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/coffe-art11_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_coffe-art11_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Sure this reproduction of Michelangelo's <i>The Creation of Adam</i> is a lil' bit perverted by the inclusion of a coffee cup, but look closer. The entire masterpiece was painted <i>using only coffee</i></p> <p>I'm amazed that I haven't seen these <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #coffeeart" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/coffeeart/">coffee art</a> clones before. They're the creation of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #kareneland" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/kareneland/">Karen Eland</a>, a former barista, who one day decided to dip a paint brush into her coffee cup instead of nibbling on biscotti. By gradually building layers of espresso she's able to create a range of tones and what must be the tastiest smelling paintings ever.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5399581,21,''); </script></p> <p>Maybe it's my caffeine addiction talking, but this is the first time I've ever seen the Mona Lisa and wanted to give her a lick. [<a href="http://coffee-art.com/">Coffee Art</a> via <a href="http://artsyspot.com/some-of-the-worlds-best-masterpieces-in-coffee/">Artsy Spot</a> via <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/07/some-of-the-world%E2%80%99s-greatest-masterpieces-in-coffee/">Neatorama</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399583/famous-paintings-reproduced-in-coffee]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399583]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Art ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Coffee]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Coffee art]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Coffee art by karen eland]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Espresso]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Karen eland]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Paintings]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:15:09 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399583&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ MIT Media Lab: Electronic Wallpaper, Conductive Threads and More [Fashion] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1qCizhN67hA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1qCizhN67hA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a href="http://www.dianaeng.com/">Diana Eng</a>, who you might remember as <em>Project Runway</em>'s premiere nerd designer, took a look at MIT's Media Lab and found some pretty cool stuff, mostly run off of Arduino microcontrollers. Check it out below.</p> <p>A lot of this stuff is just playful, so some of the clothes don't need to be too polished&mdash;but I love that electronic wallpaper. Down with lightswitches, I say! [<a href="http://fairytalefashion.org/episode.php?id=6">Fairytale Fashion</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399548/mit-media-lab-electronic-wallpaper-conductive-threads-and-more]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399548]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Fashion ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[arduino]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Conductive threads]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[diana eng]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Mit]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[MIT Media Lab]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399548&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 64% of Men Don’t RTFM Before Calling Tech Support [Tech Support] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/battle_of_the_sexes_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #gadgethelpline" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gadgethelpline/">Gadget Helpline</a>, a UK <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #techsupport" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/techsupport/">tech support</a> service, found that well over half of their male customers didn't even bother to read the manual before calling tech support. C'mon guys, is that the best we can do?</p> <p>Apparently, only 24% of females don't read the manual before picking up the phone. Good on you, ladies. Apparently you're far less lazy than us when it comes to reading.</p> <p>We guys are worse at figuring out the easy stuff, too. 12% of male callers needed to do something stupid to fix the problem, like plugging the item in or <i>turning it on</i>, versus 7% of female callers.</p> <p>We're also much less pleasant to talk to. Even through the average female customer spends 33% more time on the phone than the average male, 66% of the helpline staff said they preferred talking to female callers.</p> <p>Of course, I know that all of you male readers fall into the category of never reading the manual and never having needed to. But still, we could be doing better. [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8346810.stm">BBC</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399459/64-of-men-dont-rtfm-before-calling-tech-support]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399459]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Tech Support ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battle of the sexes]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gadget Helpline]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Manual]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399459&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Cité du Design Certainly Lives Up to Its Name [Architecture] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Cite-du-Design-14.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Cite-du-Design-14.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This gorgeous building in France is more than just a pretty complex. The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #citdudesign" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/citdudesign/">Cité du Design</a> does one of the best jobs I've ever seen at concealing the solar panels that help power the structure.</p> <p>The building is made up of 14,000 equilateral triangles. Some are solar panels, some are windows, others just fill out the structure. The net result is a building that manages to mask the black behemoths you're used to seeing.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5399516,4,''); </script>I love how the exterior influences the interior lighting, not to mention how great it all looks when lit up. [<a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/11/06/cite-du-design-solar-powered-international-design-center-unveiled/">Inhabitat</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399518/the-cite-du-design-certainly-lives-up-to-its-name]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399518]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Architecture ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cité du design]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399518&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Latest Snow Leopard Developer Build Breaks Hackintosh Support... Again [Hackintosh] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yx8tZF302Wc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yx8tZF302Wc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Enough with the back and forth already, Apple. If you're going to kill Atom support then just kill it. Don't toy with us, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395020/is-apple-trying-to-kill-hackintosh-netbooks-os-x-1062-ditches-atom-cpu-support">taking</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397241/os-x-1062-does-not-ditch-atom-support-hackintosh-safe">giving</a> like some sort of merciless god.</p> <p>The video above shows what happens if you try to boot the latest 10.6.2 developer build on a Hackintosh. As you can see, not much. So if you're running OS X on Atom hardware, hold off on any updates until this whole mess gets sorted out. [<a href="http://osxdaily.com/2009/11/07/current-10-6-2-build-does-not-support-intel-atom-chip-confirmed/">OS X Daily</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399479/latest-snow-leopard-developer-build-breaks-hackintosh-support-again]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399479]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Hackintosh ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[IntelAtom]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Os X]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[OsX10.6.2]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[SnowLeopard]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399479&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Nokia Booklet 3G Landing November 15 at Best Buy [Nokia] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/best-buy-booklet-3g.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_best-buy-booklet-3g.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We knew the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372883/nokias-3g-booklet-netbook-spotted-at-best-buy-with-less-atrocious-600-price-tag">the place and the price</a>, just needed to know when the party starts. You can grab a pre-order for the $600 netbook ($300 with two-year contract) at Best Buy and pick it up November 15. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/07/best-buy-stocking-nokias-booklet-3g-on-november-15th/">Engadget</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399467/nokia-booklet-3g-landing-november-15-at-best-buy]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399467]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Nokia ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[BestBuy]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[NokiaBooklet]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[NokiaBooklet3g]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399467&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ BlueBeat’s Innovative Defense That Will Never Hold Up in Court [Music] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bluebeat_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Hank Risan was <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/11/bluebeat-claims-to-own-new-copyrights-to-old-beatles-songs/">ordered to pull</a> The Beatles' catalog from the BlueBeat website this week, but those weren't the actual recordings. The tracks were "psycho-acoustic simulations" of the songs. Too bad that defense will never hold up in court.</p> <p>Hank calls the technique equivalent to a virtual cover band playing The Beatles' songs. He bought all of their albums, had a computer analyze the waveforms to determine their pitch, timbre and other defining qualities, then destroyed the original copies of the music.</p> <p>He then had a computer reconstruct the songs based on the data it collected from analyzing the waveforms. It wasn't a recording, but a complete mathematical rebuild of the song.</p> <p>That's really cool, and incredibly impressive that he managed to recreate the tracks from scratch like that, but there's no way the defense stands a chance against EMI's lawyers. I think I remember this argument being tried before with MP3s. A defendant claimed that because a majority of the waveform data was thrown away during encoding, it was not identical to the original recording.</p> <p>Nice try, said the judge. As long as it's audibly identifiable as a certain recording, it constitutes as copyright infringement. At least that's what I remember. If anyone knows the specific case or I'm completely wrong, please chime in. Have fun in court November 20, Mr. Risan. [<a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/tyler-gray/post-pop/bluebeat-s-hank-risan-s-not-beatles-it-s-virtual-cover-band?partner=rss">FastCompany</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399449/bluebeats-innovative-defense-that-will-never-hold-up-in-court]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399449]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Music ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Beatles]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[BlueBeat]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Emi]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Recording]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Riaa]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399449&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Watch Jonathan Ive's Segment in  Objectified  [Apple] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/ive2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ive2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5221987/objectified-review">Objectified</a></em>, Gary Hustwit's look at the world of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #industrialdesign" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/industrialdesign/">industrial design</a>, featured <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5137782/inside-jonathan-ives-apple-design-lab">a lengthy section</a> on Apple Chief Designer <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jonive" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jonive/">Jon Ive</a>&mdash;and now that clip is online for impatient Apple fans to see. [<a href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/11/07/inside-apples-industrial-design-lab/">Brainstorm Tech</a>]</p> <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t0fe800C2CU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t0fe800C2CU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p> <p>The clip is pretty interesting, even if you're not normally enamored with Apple. Ive is the most prominent tech designer of the last two decades, and I like his philosophy on "getting design out of the way." Hopefully the clip motivates you guys to go see the full movie, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5221987/objectified-review">which is great</a>, even if it doesn't reach the heights of Hustwit's previous effort <em>Helvetica</em>.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399420/watch-jonathan-ives-segment-in-objectified]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399420]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Industrial Design]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[jon ive]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Ive]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Jonathan ive objectified]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Objectified]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:45:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399420&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Robot Cow Rectum: For Educational, not Recreational, Purposes [Robots] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/cow.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_cow.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The ‘<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hapticcow" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hapticcow/">Haptic Cow</a>' recently won Sarah Baillie the Most Innovative Teacher of the Year Award. Hear that, Adam Frucci? It's for <i>learning</i>. Don't get any <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375323/i-had-sex-with-furniture-the-shameful-nsfw-fleshlight-motion-review">ideas</a>.</p> <p>Miss Baillie's invention solves one of the biggest problems in veterinary medicine. That is, once your hand is up an cow's butt you can't really see anything you're doing. Now, with robotic organs and a monitor, she can teach students exactly what they should (and definitely should not) be grabbing.</p> <p>On a related note, Miss Baillie claims she is also working on a 'Haptic Horse.' Kent Smith may well have some ideas for her, as evidenced by this September Photoshop Contest entry:<br> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/KentSmith_HorseController.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_KentSmith_HorseController.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you'd like to be put in touch, Miss Baille, please let me know. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/11/haptic-cow/">Wired</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399414/robot-cow-rectum-for-educational-not-recreational-purposes]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399414]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Robots ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Haptic cow]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Robot]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Robot cow rectum]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[vet]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Veterinarian]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:15:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399414&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Microsoft COFEE, Some of the Most Illegal Software You Can Pirate [Hacking] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/pirate_coffee.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Apparently Microsoft's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/385476/microsoft-cofee-wont-perk-you-up-but-it-will-instamagically-hack-your-computer">COFEE</a> software that helps law enforcement grab data from password protected or encrypted sources is leaking all over the internet. So not only can you steal the software, but break the law by using it too.</p> <p>Yep, it's all out there on the internet, but if you use it to grab private data from someone else's computer chances are you're in for a world of legal hurt. It's one of the few pieces of software I can think of where the subsequent use is more illegal than the act of downloading it.</p> <p>But I know it's not the only one. What else can you guys come up with? [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/06/siren-gif-microsoft-cofee-law-enforcement-tool-leaks-all-over-the-internet/">CrunchGear</a>, <a href="http://www.piratemerch.com/pirate-writing-tablet-p-1079.html">Pirate Merch</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399377/microsoft-cofee-some-of-the-most-illegal-software-you-can-pirate]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399377]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Hacking ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cofee]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft cofee]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399377&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Building a NAS? Skip the Performance Drives [Nas] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/hdds.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_hdds.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A while ago I was considering putting low-powered 5400 RPM drives into a NAS. I was worried about performance, but <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/network-attached-storage,2448.html#xtor=RSS-182">Tom's Hardware</a> shows us that drive speed isn't the bottleneck, and how slower drives can even beat faster ones.</p> <p>The main bottleneck in any NAS is the RAID engine. Since many NAS units don't include a dedicated controller, oftentimes the speed of the drive just doesn't matter. If you're using a blazing-fast hardware RAID card in your own custom built setup, then drive speed might make a difference. But for most consumer units, the controller is the bottleneck.</p> <p>With that in mind, you can go with slower 5400 RPM drives that reduce power consumption, generate less heat, and will likely cost less up front too. Even if you have a dedicated RAID card that could let a 7200 RPM drive do it's thing at full speed, I'd consider the benefits of low-power drives to outweigh the marginal speed increase you might see.</p> <p>This chart shows the difference between Samsung 7200 and 5400 RPM drives in various RAID configurations:</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/HD321KJ_vs_HD103SI_-_Backup.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Not much, right? So think twice before you drop more than necessary on 7200 RPM drives for your backup unit. Check out the link for the full test rundown. [<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/network-attached-storage,2448.html#xtor=RSS-182">Tom's Hardware</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399370/building-a-nas-skip-the-performance-drives]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399370]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Nas ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Hard disk]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Hard Drive]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Hdd]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399370&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The iPhone Nano Rumor Strikes Again: Coming to Verizon in 2010? [Rumor] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphone_nano_display.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The latest round of iPhone rumors reads like a roundup of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5228932/apple-in-high-level-iphone-talks-with-verizon-wireless">everything we've heard before</a>. Now the mythical <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5034200/the-iphone-nano-will-always-be-with-us">iPhone nano</a> is back, and supposedly said device will be coming to Verizon in 2010 featuring a new hybrid cellular radio.</p> <p>Keep in mind this is all coming from an industry analyst report supplied to Apple Insider, and as with all analyst reports, take it with a huge chunk of rock salt.</p> <p>Rumor has it that the new iPhone will have a hybrid UMTS/CDMA radio inside, so it'll work on nearly all major carriers. The report also cites that the device will have a 2.8" screen, downsized from the current 3.5" display.</p> <p>That's nothing we haven't heard before, but the one thing that might make this report more believable than others is the tidbit about who'll make the thing. According to the document, Pegatron will build the phone and not Hon Hai, the current manufacturer.</p> <p>Baseless speculation, or looming product launch? Whatever the case, I'm much less excited about these rumors now that Android handsets are available on Verizon. As great as an iPhone would be on Big Red, there are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">very solid alternatives</a> that you can pick up today, so why wait? [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/06/report_apple_to_launch_verizon_iphone_in_q3_2010.html">Apple Insider</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399362/the-iphone-nano-rumor-strikes-again-coming-to-verizon-in-2010]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399362]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Rumor ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iphone nano]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399362&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 8-Bit Wedding Invitation Acknowledges the Marital Bickering to Come [8-Bit Wedding] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/8bitwedding1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_8bitwedding1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I love this <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #8bitwedding" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/8bitwedding/">8-bit wedding</a> invitation. Not only for the design, but because it not-so-subtly portrays marriage as a prolonged Street Fighter match.</p> <p>Don't get me wrong, I've got nothing against marriage. And if you've got a wife awesome enough to agree to an invitation like this, it'll probably be pretty smooth sailing from here on out. But let's face it, there'll be times where verbal Hadouken's are thrown. So why not acknowledge that with an awesome wedding invitation?</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/8bitwedding2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_8bitwedding2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I'm assuming the front says "Marry Me" in binary, but I'll leave that to those of you fluent in cyborg parlance to decode. Combine this with the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389285/i-want-a-slice-of-this-amazingly-freaky-dead-tauntaun-wedding-cake">Tauntaun cake</a> and you've got yourself a real wedding. [<a href="http://www.geekstir.com/8-bit-wedding-invitation">GeekStir</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399337/8+bit-wedding-invitation-acknowledges-the-marital-bickering-to-come]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399337]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ 8-Bit wedding ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[8-Bit]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Atari]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Invitation]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Wedding]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399337&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Zune HD Update 4.3: Speedier Browser, Predictive Text and More [Zune Hd] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_IMG_9406_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #zunehd" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/zunehd/">Zune HD</a> users should be able to download the latest firmware update now, and it's substantial enough to warrant grabbing ASAP. There's a speedier browser, predictive text entry (a la iPhone), and that's just the beginning. <strong>Updated:</strong></p> <p><strong>Update:</strong> The firmware upgrade went through just fine on my 32GB Zune HD, and I'm definitely seeing an improvement in the browser's speed. Before, it was mysteriously slow, especially compared to the iPod Touch's browser&mdash;there's no reason for that, especially given the Zune HD's speedy Tegra processor. Even with the upgrade, it's slightly slower than Mobile Safari, especially when loading heavy sites like Gizmodo, but it's noticeably faster and not at all irritating anymore.</p> <p>It's good to see Microsoft offering optimizations, but we're still waiting for a more major firmware upgrade: Social networking, IM, and YouTube should be top priorities. That being said, I still love the Zune HD&mdash;it's even wowed the notoriously hard-to-please <a href="http://twitter.com/blam/status/5296245257">Brian Lam</a>.</p> <blockquote> <p>Browser:</p> <p>•Faster performance in navigating web pages<br> •Option to render pages as Desktop or Mobile (Option in settings)<br> •Better Tap-To-Zoom<br> •Better ability to scroll when typing a message online</p> <p>Keyboard:</p> <p>•Predictive Text<br> •Auto capitilization<br> •Dedicated Settings Menu<br> •Wider keyboard in landscape mode</p> <p>Music:</p> <p>•Artist bios now contain links to songs, other artists, and other albums<br> Radio:</p> <p>•Choice of seek method (presets or seek) in settings<br> Other</p> <p>•Apps load slightly faster, and the accuracy of the touchscreen is improved during game play.<br> •Apps close faster<br> •The power off says "slide down to power off" instead of just "Power Off"<br> •Faster Startup (less than 15s)</p> </blockquote> <p>The download should be available through the Zune software, but some 16GB users are reporting it hasn't been pushed through to them yet. If you can get it, report back with anything else new/better you find. [<a href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/microsoft/zune/hd/general/Firmware-Update-4-3-191-/">GDGT</a>, <a href="http://www.mobiletechworld.com/2009/11/07/new-zunehd-firmware-version-4-3-released/">MobileTechWorld</a>, <i>thanks Ubi79!</i>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399336/zune-hd-update-43-speedier-browser-predictive-text-and-more]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399336]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ zune hd ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4.3]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Firmware]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Zune]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:24:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399336&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Hello Facebook User, I'm a Nigerian Prince in Need of Assistance... [Facebook] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/thumb160x_scamville-tc1.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Facebook ad scamming is on the rise, unsurprising for a site gaining a huge user base&mdash;what is surprising, if the allegation proves true, is Facebook's complicity in allowing the dodgy ads.</p> <p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/31/scamville-the-social-gaming-ecosystem-of-hell/">Tech Crunch</a>'s Michael Arrington believes that Facebook is looking the other way because it doesn't want to lose the revenue. He points out popular game Farmville: "it took me about 10 seconds to find really scammy ads."</p> <p>Of course Facebook is adamant that it's doing everything it can to stop scams. In an email exchange with Newsweek, Facebook spokesman David Swain stated "We have, and will continue to, move aggressively to stop any activities that threaten or damage our users' experience. Any assertion to the contrary is false." Policing and curtailing scam containing ads will be a challenge for Facebook as it grows, though it would be a good idea to tackle the problem now while it's still manageable.</p> <p>I can't wait to see how this plays out in the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/06/24/tech/cnettechnews/main5109482.shtml">Facebook movie</a>. [<a href="http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/techtonicshifts/archive/2009/11/06/is-facebook-a-paradise-for-scammers.aspx">Newsweek</a>]<br> <i>Photo by <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/31/scamville-the-social-gaming-ecosystem-of-hell/">TechCrunch</a></i></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399036/hello-facebook-user-im-a-nigerian-prince-in-need-of-assistance]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399036]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Facebook ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Arrington]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399036&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Gigabyte BIOS Update Fixes iPhone Syncing Issues [IPhone] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Gigabyte's been listening to all of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5394363/windows-7-and-intel-chipset-causing-iphone-woes">iPhone syncing issues</a> from motherboard owners using Intel's P55 chipset. They've put out a beta BIOS that addresses the problem. Unfortunately, that doesn't help all the Asus and MSI users who are having the same troubles, but hopefully now that Gigabyte has set an example the others will follow.</p> <p>If you're one of the unlucky few, hit the link to grab the update. [<a href="http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Support/Motherboard/BIOS_Model.aspx?ProductID=3160">Gigabyte</a> via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/181654/update_fixes_iphone_sync_problem_with_windows_7_for_some.html?tk=rss_news">PC World</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399320/gigabyte-bios-update-fixes-iphone-syncing-issues]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399320]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gigabyte]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[intel p55]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Msi]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[p55]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399320&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Dealzmodo: $100 Xbox 360 at Amazon, More Electronics Deals All Day Long [Dealzmodo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/amazon_gold_box_xbox_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Remember that Walmart ad featuring a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397060/walmart-selling-200-xbox-360-this-weekend-with-free-100-gift-card">$100 Xbox</a>? Well, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/goldbox/ref=cs_top_nav_gb27">Amazon</a> is matching the offer, so you can skip the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5347134/walmart-gadget-shoppers-sometime-look-like-this">crowds</a>. There'll be other electronics deals running all day starting at 9 a.m. EST. <b>Update:</b></p> <p>It looks like the Amazon 9 a.m. deal ran out (not before I managed to grab one, natch), but the same deal will be running again at 12 p.m. PST, 3 p.m. EST. So don't despair, there's a second chance! Also, <a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=13044371">Walmart</a> is now featuring the deal online. Man holiday price competitions rule.</p> <p>And also, anyone who thinks they got the Xbox deal, MAKE SURE to check your order confirmation. If you didn't get a $0.01 discount with the phrase "Lightning Deal" next to it, you won't be receiving a credit. I just checked mine and sure enough, I'm SOL, so I cancelled. [<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/goldbox/ref=cs_top_nav_gb27">Amazon</a> via <a href="http://www.cheapassgamer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=242076">Cheap Ass Gamer</a>, <i>thanks Jonathan!</i>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399310/dealzmodo-100-xbox-360-at-amazon-more-electronics-deals-all-day-long]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399310]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Dealzmodo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lightning deals]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Xbox]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399310&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 10 Terrible Tips for Longer Battery Life [Humor] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Battery_Life_tips.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Nowadays, everything comes with a rechargeable battery, but who knew that getting long battery life could get soooo confusing? Here are 10 expert-backed tips to keep you from running low on the juice:</p> <p><strong>1.</strong> Since a battery should never be 100% full or 100% empty, you should charge it then discharge it in sequence ideally ranging between 80% to 20%. Start by charging for 12 minutes, then running it down, then charge it for 11 minutes then run it down, and so on. Confused? Just use this handy formula: n!=C(n,k)/r! where n can't equal r, and k never reaches zero. Simple!</p> <p><strong>2.</strong> If you use a phone or laptop without first charging its battery fully, you will die.</p> <p><strong>3.</strong> A lot of battery experts warn of the memory effect, but it's not really an "effect." It's just their way of saying "Remember to charge your batteries!"</p> <p><strong>4.</strong> Batteries run better when cold. The easiest way to do this is to find a refrigerated warehouse or meat locker, befriend the night watchman, and do all your work from there. ($20 bribes usually work.)</p> <p><strong>5.</strong> If your laptop battery gets hot enough to sear tuna, step away. Check your fridge for tuna. If no tuna in fridge, run to the supermarket to buy tuna. Don't worry, as long as you don't unplug your laptop, the battery will stay hot while you are gone.</p> <p><strong>6.</strong> When putting your laptop into storage, take out the battery. Wrap the extracted battery in a well oiled cloth and place it in a clay pot. Bury the pot in a hayfield. Any will do, but it's best if there's a long rock wall with a big oak tree at the north end. The battery should keep fresh for up to six months that way. If you're worried about finding it again, just mark your spot with a rock that has no earthly business in a hayfield. I favor black volcanic glass.</p> <p><strong>7.</strong> If your battery is about to run dry, take it out and blow on it. I have no idea why this works, but it totally does.</p> <p><strong>8.</strong> If your battery does die, you can always make your own: A potato theoretically has enough "potential energy" stored inside to power a laptop for a full hour&mdash;the trick is knowing where to stick the wires. Just ask a third grader. One tip: The potato must not be baked.</p> <p><strong>9.</strong> You should never confuse your batteries. Here's an easy way to keep them apart in your head: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lithiumion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lithiumion/">Lithium Ion</a> batteries explode, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nickelcadmium" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nickelcadmium/">Nickel Cadmium</a> destroys the environment, and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #leadacid" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/leadacid/">Lead Acid</a> batteries are more corrosive than the Alien Queen's blood (plus, they contain lead). You can eat <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lithiumferrophosphate" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lithiumferrophosphate/">Lithium Ferro Phosphate</a> batteries.</p> <p><strong>10.</strong> People may tell you to carry a battery-life extender in your bag, but the secret there is, it's <i>just another battery</i>. What do I recommend? Jumper cables.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398271/10-terrible-tips-for-longer-battery-life]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398271]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Humor ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lead Acid]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lithium ferro phosphate]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[lithium ion]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nickel cadmium]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Rechargeable batteries]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Shawshank Redemption]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398271&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ This Inflating Bra Commercial Left Me Confused Yet Reaching For My Wallet [Nsfw] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rtIcedRcIk0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rtIcedRcIk0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Based on my non-existent Chinese skills, I managed to understand that this <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #inflatablebra" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/inflatablebra/">inflatable bra</a> makes boobs big, BIG, <b>BIG</b>. And I guess it comes with odd sound effects included? Can someone watch please this commercial and translate for me?</p> <p>I just really <i>need</i> to know whether the voice over guy or the girl with the measuring tape are included with the purchase or sold separately.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399231/this-inflating-bra-commercial-left-me-confused-yet-reaching-for-my-wallet]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399231]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Nsfw ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ad]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ads]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Boobs]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Bra]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Bras]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Commercials]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Inflatable bra]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Inflatable bra commercial]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[jugs]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Tits]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:03:21 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399231&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Office Building Or Home To A Super Heroine? [Architecture] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/cocoon.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_cocoon.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Switzerland gets <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397405/googles-swiss-headquarters-blend-a-lot-of-fun-with-some-function">all the cool offices</a>. This particular one's dubbed "Cocoon" and acts as headquarters for an architecture firm. I prefer to imagine it as home to a super heroine who zoom-zoom-zips down that spiral and saves the day.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5398976,3,''); </script></p> <p>Such gorgeous design. When I snuggle up in my own cocoon of blankets tonight, I'm going to dream of being in that building and of being that particular super heroine. Right after I figure out a proper alter ego name that is. [<a href="http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.projectview&upload_id=12692">WAN</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399223/office-building-or-home-to-a-super-heroine]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399223]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Architecture ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Camenzind Evolution]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[cocoon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Cocoon headquarters]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:25:42 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399223&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ New For iPhone: 2 Balls 1 Cup [IPhone Apps] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/twoballsonecup.png" class="left image340" width="340" />Presented for your approval without comment. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=319716711&mt=8">iTunes Link</a> via <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2009/11/2balls1cup">The Awl</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399024/new-for-iphone-2-balls-1-cup]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399024]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone Apps ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Immaturity]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399024&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Pangolin Backpack [Bags] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Screen_shot_2009-11-06_at_11.28.11_AM.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Screen_shot_2009-11-06_at_11.28.11_AM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangolin">Pangolin</a> is a spiny anteater covered in razor sharp scales, with razor sharp claws, that can shoot acid out of its anus. This backpack is inspired by the creature.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5398994,6,''); </script><br> It is made from old truck tires. [<a href="http://www.wannekes.com/categorie/personal_accessories/product/urban_design_backpack_fair_trade_bags_men">wannekes</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398996/pangolin-backpack]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398996]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Bags ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Backpack]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Backpacks]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Backpacks pangolin]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Bag]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pangolin]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:20:43 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398996&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Computers Are Scary, But Steve Allen Is Here to Help [Retromodo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/computability_cover_large.jpg"></a><object width="464" height="337" id="1479421" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" alt="Computability with Steve Allen Funny Videos"><param name="movie" value="http://embed.break.com/MTQ3OTQyMQ=="> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"> <embed src="http://embed.break.com/MTQ3OTQyMQ==" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" width="464" height="337"></object>Back in the early 80s, computers were new and terrifying. Luckily, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #steveallen" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steveallen/">Steve Allen</a> was available to chuckle you through all of that crazy jargon. [<a href="http://www.everythingisterrible.com/2009/11/exciting-new-world-of-data-entry.html">Everything Is Terrible</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399044/computers-are-scary-but-steve-allen-is-here-to-help]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399044]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Retromodo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Steve Allen]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399044&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 5,000 Volts Is More Than Enough Power To Crush a Soda Can [DIY] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DocVqsdDQG8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DocVqsdDQG8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Bob Davis scored a complete power supply including a 5 KV transformer, 100 uf Capacitor and a contactor on eBay for $100 and did what any sane person would do&mdash;he built a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #cancrusher" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cancrusher/">can crusher</a>.</p> <p>The first test was caught on tape, and despite issues with a broken meter, the device managed to crush the hell out of that soda can. In fact, it was so powerful that the power transformer shorted out and the diode was "blown to bits". Interesting, but not quite as manly as it could be. I'm waiting to see someone build a crusher that smashes a can flat on a dummy's skull. [<a href="http://bobdavis321.blogspot.com/2009/10/5-kv-soda-can-crusher.html">Bob Davis</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/the-five-thousand-volt-soda-can-crusher/">Gadget Lab</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398974/5000-volts-is-more-than-enough-power-to-crush-a-soda-can]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398974]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ DIY ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5000 Volts]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[can crusher]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Power supply{]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:40:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398974&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ My Favorite Top 10 List Today: The Dumbest Evil Geniuses Of All Time [Evil Geniuses] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_drhorrible.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Ooooh, io9's fantastic <a href="http://io9.com/people/charliejane/posts/">Charlie Jane Anders</a> has a Friday treat for us: The <a href="http://io9.com/5397430/top-10-dumbest-evil-geniuses-of-all-time/gallery/">Top 10 Dumbest Evil Geniuses of All Time</a>. This was definitely one of my favorite reads today and I particularly agreed with number two. [<a href="http://io9.com/5397430/top-10-dumbest-evil-geniuses-of-all-time/gallery/">Io9</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399156/my-favorite-top-10-list-today-the-dumbest-evil-geniuses-of-all-time]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399156]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Evil geniuses ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Evil]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Genius]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Geniuses]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top ten dumbest evil geniuses]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399156&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Nanoparticles Can Rip Your DNA Apart Without Ever Touching It [Nanoparticles] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/DNA_damage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_DNA_damage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If I could visualize nanoparticles, I'd think of them as crime bosses because apparently they can mess with DNA without ever having direct interaction. Like a true godfather, a nanoparticle commands obedient molecules to do the dirty work.</p> <p>Researchers aren't entirely sure just how the whole process works, but they have observed the resulting damage of nanoparticles signaling a hit on DNA. They suspect that the events might go differently in situations other than a lab test and that the interaction could be used to deliver medicine or target cancer cells. Either that or further <a href="http://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-08/china-reports-first-human-nano-fatalities">nanoparticle deaths</a>.</p> <p>While they sort out the details, I'm just gonna stick to being a bit scared that I'll get a package of fish if I upset any nanoparticles anyway.[<a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2009-11/nanoparticles-can-damage-dna-through-indirect-exposure">Pop Sci</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398962/nanoparticles-can-rip-your-dna-apart-without-ever-touching-it]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398962]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Nanoparticles ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dna]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Dna damaging nanoparticles]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:40:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398962&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The G-Bound RC Car Drives On Water [Rc] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/g-bound.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_g-bound.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's no miracle, the G-Bound <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #remotecontrol" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/remotecontrol/">remote control</a> car can drive over water thanks to a waterproof chassis and inflatable tires.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5398950,4,'G-Bound'); </script></p> <p>Unfortunately, the maximum range on the G-Bound is only about 33 feet, so I wouldn't take it out to the lake unless you don't mind swimming after it. Not that it matters&mdash;it appears to be a Japan-only release for the moment. [<a href="http://www.ccp-jp.com/gbound/index.html">G-Bound</a> via <a href="http://www.hobbymedia.it/19781/g-bound-rc-car">Hobby Media</a> via <a href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091105/gbound-remote-control-car-handles-water-surfaces/">Coolest Gadgets</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398948/the-g+bound-rc-car-drives-on-water]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398948]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Rc ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[G-bound]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Remote Control]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:20:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398948&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Intel Swears That It's Gonna Stop Its Firmware From Bricking Any More SSDs [Intel] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>A few weeks ago, Intel pulled a firmware update the day after it came out because many users running 64-bit Windows 7 found that it bricked their SSDs. Whoops. The good news though is that Intel has acknowledged and replicated the bug and is working on a fix. The bad news? There's no timeline for <i>when</i> the fix will come out.[<a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/11/06/intel_34nm_ssd_glitch_fix_update/">Reg Hardware</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399154/intel-swears-that-its-gonna-stop-its-firmware-from-bricking-any-more-ssds]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399154]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Intel ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bug]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Intel bricked ssd bug]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ssd]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:00:40 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399154&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ DIY Star Trek Bluetooth Communicator Almost Makes Regular Bluetooth Headsets Look Stylish [DIY] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TueSAiSGWTs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TueSAiSGWTs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>This DIY <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a> Bluetooth Communicator instantly reminded me of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372521/fabric-antenna+based-personal-communicator-makes-most-of-my-star-trek-fantasies-reality#c15756632">a comment</a> a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/people/omg-ponies/">dear reader</a> left <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372521/fabric-antenna+based-personal-communicator-makes-most-of-my-star-trek-fantasies-reality">when I shared a Star Trek fantasy</a>. He was right: Bluetooth is the ruin of Star Trek. But this is a fun quick-n-dirty project.</p> <p>Basically you're cramming a Bluetooth module and a microcontroller into a toy Communicator and then pairing everything with your phone. As long as you've got voice dialing, you can leave your phone out of sight and be the snazziest Trekkie on the streets. Just don't come crying to me if someone stuffs you into a locker, trashcan, or wormhole. [<a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/11/star_trek_bluetooth_communicator.html">Make</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398946/diy-star-trek-bluetooth-communicator-almost-makes-regular-bluetooth-headsets-look-stylish]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398946]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ DIY ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bluetooth]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Communicator]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Diy bluetooth star trek communicator]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:40:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398946&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ This Week's Best iPhone Apps [IPhone Apps] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/twifiasd.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_twifiasd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In this week's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5398942/the-iphone+to+android-switch-10-things-you-need-to-know">never-gonna-switch-so-stop-asking</a> app roundup: Free games, reinvented! Airplane anxiety, averted! Photos, wirelessly printed! Cool apps, discovered by other cool apps! Navigation, cheapened! Black Friday rush, preempted! Google Wave, appified! Screens, pointlessly tapped! And more!</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneapp1-chorus.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p> <h2>The Best</h2> <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396062/chorus-for-iphone-puts-a-better-app-store-inside-the-app-store">Chorus</a>: Hey, Apple, when people start making apps just to help people find new apps, take it as a sign that your App Store interface could use a little help. Chorus <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396062/chorus-for-iphone-puts-a-better-app-store-inside-the-app-store">crowdsources</a> the effort to cut through the endless jungle of trash:</p> <blockquote> <p>Chorus is a bit like Apple's native App Store app, except with drastically shifted emphasis: instead of giving category "Top" lists, which rank apps by overall download numbers, Chorus only pitches you apps that've been explicitly recommended by someone. These someones could include other friends who use Chorus, nearby Chorus users, or a stable of "App Mavens"-online reviewers and tech journalists, mostly.</p> </blockquote> <p>Free.<br clear="all"> <br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneapp10-zen.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br> <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=335163276&mt=8">ZenApps</a>: An even better sign that the App Store could offer more in the way of search tools, filters and sorting options than a company making an app-finding app? Two companies making app-finding apps. ZenApps takes a more traditional approach than the social network-y Chorus, aggregating review buzz from a list of app sites into a tag cloud, or a simple list. Also free.<br clear="all"> <br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneapp2-milliontap.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396378/the-ultimate-iphone-waste-of-time">Million Tap Challenge</a>: Speaking of maybe worthless crap apps, Million Tap Challenge is a simple app with a simple goal: to be tapped. A million times. This makes the cut because unlike 99.99% of the spammy crap in the App Store, Million Tap Challenge has a sense of the absurd. It <em>knows</em> how ridiculous it is, and for just the right kind of person, it's a brilliant timekiller.<br clear="all"> <br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneapp3-flywithoutfear.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br> <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=334645359&mt=8">Flying Without Fear</a>: My pops was a pilot, and the thought of being suspended 32,000 feet in the air in a tiny aluminum tube still <em>freaks me the hell out</em>. Flying without fear takes a two-pronged approach to soothing panicked passengers, with relaxation exercises on one side, and more importantly, detailed explanations of each step in typical airline flight, and the terrifying sounds that accompany them. Minor complaint <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/1/" class="posthashtag">#1</a>: $5 seems a little steep for a branded app&mdash;this one is slathered in Virgin Atlantic's colors and logo. Minor complaint <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/2/" class="posthashtag">#2</a>: Sir Richard Branson, who provides a video intro, is scarier than the worst transatlantic turbulence I've ever sat through. IT'S THE BEARD, BEARDO.<br clear="all"> <br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneapp4-gokivo.jpg" width="160" height="238"><br> <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=319730503&mt=8">Gokivo</a>: It's getting hard to keep track of all the iPhone navigation apps' names, much less their price structures, so here's what you need to know: Gokivo, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gokivo">decent-but-too-expensive navigation app</a>, has become Gokivo, the decent and now-not-too-expensive navigation app. The price has dropped from $5/mo to $5 dollars 30 days or $40 for the year. It's not as dirt-cheap as products like MotionX Drive and CoPilot, but solid text-to-speech and live traffic make this a deal.<br clear="all"> <br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneapp5-blackfriday.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br> <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=329071486&mt=8">Black</a> <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=295358197&mt=8">Friday</a>(s): This one comes in two parts, actually! Both <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=295358197&mt=8">FatWallet</a> and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=329071486&mt=8">Dealnews</a> have put together apps that'll aggregate the best last-minute Black Friday deals come (almost) Thanksgiving. Neither is getting very good reviews right now, mostly due to their lack of deals. Today November 6th, so this is mildly mind-boggling. Patience!<br clear="all"> <br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneapp6-lexmark.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br> <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=333208547&mt=8">LexPrint</a>: Hey, remember Lexmark? They made printers! And evidently, they still make printers! Also, they've put together one of the better iPhone photo printing apps I've seen. Instead of shipping with grossly limited compatibility like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/canon/iphone">other printing apps</a> (seriously, everyone's got one now, but they're all pretty picky about which printers they talk with) Lexmark bridged the wireless gap with a PC client called Listener, which accepts print requests in lieu of a wireless radio <em>on</em> the actual printer. Kind of brilliant, if you have a Lexmark.<br clear="all"> <br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneapp7-waveboard.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br> <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=335558495&mt=8">Waveboard</a>: Google Wave is still invite-only, so it's a little strange to see a dedicated app this early on. That said, a sizable group of people are already <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5395376/the-complete-guide-to-google-wave-is-a-comprehensive-book-on-wave">power-using the shit</a> out of this service that I don't think I'll ever fully understand, so Waveboard, which is marginally better than the stock Wave web interface, might be worth the one dollar entry fee.<br clear="all"> <br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneapp8-eliminate.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br> <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=318760264&mt=8">Eliminate</a>: This one lands in the top ten for two reasons. One is obvious: This is a fun, smooth-running FPS with intuitive controls&mdash;rare!&mdash;and solid gameplay. The other is a little counterintuitive: To get the full Eliminate experience, you probably need to shell out for Energy Cells via in-app purchases. This is good precisely because it's <em>terrible</em>, and provides a perfect example to other devs of how <em>not</em> to use the new in-app purchase system. It's fun while the free lasts, though! A cautionary tale.<br clear="all"> <br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneapp9-tower.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br> <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=335249553&mt=8">TowerMadness Zero</a>: TowerMadness used to be a better-than-average tower defense game, rendered in 3D and priced at about $3. Then, there was a lightning strike. A developer was zapped in the skull, collapsed, and three hours later awoke, dazed. As he stood up and surveyed his charred surroundings, he froze as if he was having a stroke; his eyes, though, twinkled. He had an idea. When he finally spoke, everyone around him was stunned: "TOWERMADNESS SHALL BE FREE," he bellowed, "AND IT SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY ADS THAT ARE NOT VERY ANNOYING." Then he died, from the burns. Pointlessly dramatic fake scenario aside, this kind of thing should happen more often.<br clear="all"></p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_babyapp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p> <h2>Honorable Mentions</h2> <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5398180/iphone-app-interprets-babies-tears-while-excusing-pathetic-parenting">Cry Translator</a>: This one purports to tell you what your baby's various gurgles, yelps and screams mean. This sounds implausible! Also implausible: That it's somehow worth $30. Just jingle your keys, try to feed it, and smell for poop. Parenting, <em>done</em>.</p> <p><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=335125899&mt=8">Family Guy</a>: Hey look, it's a game based on a popular-but-well-past-its-prime television series! It's a bit Nintendo-like, which is charming, and the free version is worth a few minutes of you time, provided you don't hate Family Guy.</p> <p><em>This list is in no way definitive. If you've spotted a great app that hit the store this week, give us a heads up or, better yet, your firsthand impressions in the comments. And for even more apps: see our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-week-in-iPhone-apps/">previous weekly roundups here</a>, and check out our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory">Favorite iPhone Apps Directory</a>. Have a great weekend, everybody!</em></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399064/this-weeks-best-iphone-apps/gallery/]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399064]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone Apps ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[the week in iPhone apps]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:20:46 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399064&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Queen of Google: "I  Do  Code All Night!" [Google] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/googlegirl.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />This is <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #marissamayer" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/marissamayer/">Marissa Mayer</a>, the queen of Google. Every Google thing that you use goes through her. And she's nerd. So she says, sitting on her red ball in that red dress:</p> <blockquote> <p>"When people think about computer science, they imagine people with pocket protectors and thick glasses who code all night. I <em>do</em> code all night! I am the stereotype, but I also break the stereotype."</p> </blockquote> <p>Oh, if only there were more of you, breaking stereotypes. [<a href="http://www.glamour.com/women-of-the-year/2009/marissa-mayer">Glamour</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399133/the-queen-of-google-i-do-code-all-night]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399133]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Google ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Marissa Mayer]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:19:41 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399133&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Folding Titanium Spork Is the Ultimate Portable Eating Utensil [Spork] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_folding_titanium_spork.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />As the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5347994/the-captivating-history-of-the-spork">resident expert on the spork</a>, I wholeheartedly endorse this super-rugged titanium folding combination bottle opener and spork design. [<a href="http://www.tadgear.com/shop.php?id=585">Tad Gear</a> via <a href="http://theawesomer.com/folding-titanium-spork/21711/">The Awesomer</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398855/the-folding-titanium-spork-is-the-ultimate-portable-eating-utensil]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398855]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Spork ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Folding spork]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Foon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Titanium]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Utensils]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398855&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Steve Jobs and Sarah Jessica Parker Sittin' In A Courthouse B-E-I-N-G S-U-E-D [Lawsuits] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/sarahjessica.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />In 1989, Franz A. Wakefield invented the iPod, the iPhone, and iTunes. Then the FBI stole his trade secrets and he confided in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sarahjessicaparker" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sarahjessicaparker/">Sarah Jessica Parker</a> and now he's suing her and Apple...and my head's spinning.</p> <p>It's a tale of quite the nutter and I can barely keep the facts straight. Franz A. Wakefield, the injured party, wants to head into the courthouse and face Apple, Inc. and Sarah Jessica Parker, who will certainly be shaking in fear based on the lawsuit:</p> <blockquote> <p>The suit claims that Wakefield [...] developed a friendship with Parker and "made a trade secret deal" with her to commercialize the iPod classic, nano, mini, shuffle, video, touch and photo, as well as iTunes and the iPhone. The supposed agreement would have granted Parker 2 percent of gross revenues from the products. Wakefield said he asked the FBI to watch over him to ensure the security of his inventions and deal with Parker.</p> </blockquote> <p>Apparently sexy Sarah must've been talked into cutting freaky Frank out of the deal entirely and told suave Steve all about what would later become Apple's products.</p> <p>Frank's pretty forgiving though, he even wrote Steve a sweet note:</p> <blockquote> <p>This letter is to serve as a DEMAND for payment. Otherwise I will seek legal recourse for the immediate cease and desist from the manufacture, marketing, and sale of all the iPOD, iTunes, and Iphone lines; along with pursuing damages from the products sold to date, unjust enrichment caused by the theft, enforcement of the agreed 2% gross revenues on all sales, and any other applicable damages or compensation.</p> </blockquote> <p>Such a nice guy. I'm sure he'll win. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/06/bizarre_lawsuits_connect_apple_with_sarah_jessica_parker_lil_wayne.html">Apple Insider</a>]</p> <p><i>Photo by <a href="http://www.celebrity-pictures.ca/Celebrities/Sarah-Jessica-Parker/Sarah-Jessica-Parker-6.JPG">Celebrity Pictures</a></i></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399094/steve-jobs-and-sarah-jessica-parker-sittin-in-a-courthouse-b+e+i+n+g-s+u+e+d]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399094]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Lawsuits ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bizarre apple lawsuit]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Franz A. Wakefield ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[lil' wayne]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sarah Jessica Parker]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Wtf]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:45:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399094&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Next Room Eavesdropping Device Is Way Better Than a Drinking Glass [Surveillance] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_nextroom_spy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nextroom" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nextroom/">Next Room</a> is kind of like a mash up between a stethoscope, MP3 player and an old fashioned drinking glass. According to the product page, you can hear what is being said through wooden walls, doors, windows&mdash;even steel plates.</p> <p>It features an internal sound amplifier, a 3.5mm jack for headphones and a USB port for recharging. Nice, but if you really want to take this whole scumbaggy espionage thing to another level, you go with the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5229815/sim-card-spy-ear-gets-smaller-scumbags-get-bigger">SIM card spy ear</a>. [<a href="http://chinagrabber.com/next-room-ear-amplifier-spy-wall-door-eavesdrop-device---spy-ear-eavesdrop.aspx">Chinagrabber</a> via <a href="http://www.7gadgets.com/2009/11/05/next-room-ear-amplifier-spy-wall/15462">7Gadgets</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/11/05/next-room-eavesdropping-device/">OhGizmo</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398876/the-next-room-eavesdropping-device-is-way-better-than-a-drinking-glass]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398876]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Surveillance ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Eavesdropping]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Next room]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Spy Ear]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:20:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398876&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Wire Your House With Ethernet Cable For Better Home Networking [DIY] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ethernet.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />I finally started watching <i>Californication</i> recently, but my big annoyance since then is that my&mdash;ahem&mdash;mostly-legally downloaded episodes take ages to transfer wirelessly from laptop to media center PC. Thankfully <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5398668/wire-your-house-with-ethernet-cable">Lifehacker's</a> got a DIY wiring solution for my troubles.</p> <p>The instructions are actually pretty thorough and explain everything you need to know about running <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #cat5e" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cat5e/">CAT 5e</a> or <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #cat6" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cat6/">CAT 6</a> cables through your home, walls, and attic without making a horrid mess, but please don't blame me if you somehow manage to destroy something anyway. [<a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/How_to_Wire_Your_House_With_Cat_5_or_6_For_Ether/">Instructables</a> via <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5398668/wire-your-house-with-ethernet-cable">Lifehacker</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398865/wire-your-house-with-ethernet-cable-for-better-home-networking]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398865]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ DIY ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cat 5e]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Cat 6]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Diy ethernet wiring]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ethernet]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398865&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 10 Classic Analog Games Defiled By Digital [Tgif] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/touchcube.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_touchcube.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>So, I'm doing the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396971/the-mindflex-brainwave-game-gives-me-a-headache">Mindflex game review</a>, and I start thinking about the evolution of classic <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #boardgames" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/boardgames/">board games</a>. Personally, I like the fact that many of them got a 21st century makeover. These 10 games may have purists thinking otherwise.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5399042,10,'Digital Games'); </script></p> <p>For the most part, do you consider these digital upgrades as good or bad ideas?</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398738/10-classic-analog-games-defiled-by-digital]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398738]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ tgif ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Analog]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Board Games]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[thank giz it's friday]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398738&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ OpenOfficeMouse Is An 18 Button Freak, But I Want It [Mouse] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/openofficemouse.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_openofficemouse.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>18 programmable buttons. E-I-G-H-T-E-E-N! Forget the 512k of flash memory, analog Xbox 360-style joystick, basic scroll wheel and whatever-else-is-in-there. 18 buttons! Yes, I'm a button lover. Yes, I just had an orgasm. And yes, I will waste $75 on this.</p> <p>Sure, it's not that attractive looking and it's probably awkward as all hell to use, but the prospect of programming all those buttons has me giddy. While the guy who designed the mouse thinks it'd be great for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #worldofwarcraft" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/worldofwarcraft/">World of Warcraft</a> or OpenOffice tasks, I know I won't be wasting a single button for either of those things. Anyone got better suggestions? [<a href="http://openofficemouse.com/pr110609.html">Open Office Mouse</a>&mdash;<i>Thanks, <a href="http://twitter.com/joeljohnson">Joel</a>!</i>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399027/openofficemouse-is-an-18-button-freak-but-i-want-it]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399027]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Mouse ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mice]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Open Office]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[openofficemouse]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[World of Warcraft]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:19:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399027&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The iPhone-to-Android Switch: 10 Things You Need to Know [Android] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Switch_Feiss_Android_Like.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Switch_Feiss_Android_Like.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You've had it. Maybe with AT&T. Maybe with Apple's crushing, dictatorial grip strangling the App Store. Whatever the reason, you're going to Android: Land of freedom, carriers not named AT&T, and the great Google. Here's what you need to know.</p> <h2>It's All in the Google Cloud</h2> <p>Android phones don't sync with your computer. That's because they don't have to: Your contacts, calendar and mail are all kept up in the great Googleyplex. Unfortunately, Google's Contacts manager, while it's gotten better, is kinda crappy, and all of your Contacts are beamed down to your phone from there.</p> <p>So even after you get the actual contacts you wanna talk to exported to Google Contacts, one problem is that all of your Google contacts, like <em>everybody</em> you email, show up on your phone. What you have to do is either sort your contacts into different groups and tell the phone's Contacts app to show only the groups you only wanna see, or to only show you people with phone numbers. If you wanna sync your contacts, so you have a master copy on your computer and can manage them from there, that problem takes a bit of legwork&mdash;at least on Windows.</p> <p>If you're on a Mac, it's easy to keep your Contacts synced&mdash;just tell Address Book to sync with Google. On Windows, you'll need a third-party app, like <a href="http://www.webgear.co.nz/Products/GOContactSync.aspx">GO contact</a>. That way, you can manage your contacts on your desktop, and have a local copy that's always synced up with what Google's got.</p> <p>Calendars are easier: Google's got <a href="http://www.google.com/sync/pc.html">an app</a> for that.</p> <p>Exchange support varies from version to version: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android20" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android20/">Android 2.0</a> has it, previous vanilla versions of Android don't, but carriers like Sprint and hardware makers like HTC have been rolling their own Exchange solution into Android. Check the box, in other words.</p> <h2>The Gmail App Is Amazing</h2> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gmailbig2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_gmailbig2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If your primary email account is Gmail, that's almost reason enough to go Android. Not only is Gmail pushed to your phone, the Gmail app is an absolutely perfect rendition of the Gmail experience for the small screen. Threaded conversations (hurray), full label support, starring, archiving and a true Gmail look-and-feel. It's even better in Android 2.0, which finally includes support for using multiple Google accounts with the Gmail app, and a few interface tweaks to make it easier to use.</p> <p>For your non-Google accounts, there's a separate email app that's a pretty standard IMAP/POP mobile email app. Not amazing, not bad.</p> <h2>For That Matter, All of the Google Apps Are Amazing</h2> <p>You might be switching to Android for political reasons, or just to get away from AT&T, but what's gonna make switching actually <em>work</em> is that all of the Google services are fantastic, and often, more powerful than their iPhone counterparts.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gtalk.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_gtalk.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Google Talk is the non-Gmail killer app for me, and highlights just how badly the iPhone needs a native messaging app&mdash;it's like BlackBerry Messenger, but for Google. (Or mobile AIM, but less shitty.) Keep in mind, anyone signed in to Gmail on a desktop browser can be reached through Google Talk if they've authorized it, so you've probably got more "buddies" than you might realize.</p> <p>Latitude is actually built into the Maps app; Google Voice integrates seamlessly; and Google actually frequently releases updates them the Android Marketplace. Oh, and did I mention Google Navigation? Yeah.</p> <p>What Google hasn't gotten around to yet is integrating Google Docs, but the web version with Android's HTML5-superpowered browser is pretty good.</p> <h2>Not Being on AT&T Is Just as Liberating As You'd Hoped</h2> <p>I've never had full bars on any Android phone&mdash;on T-Mobile, Sprint or Verizon&mdash;and not been able to do something online. End of story.</p> <h2>Multitasking Is All It's Cracked Up to Be, Mostly</h2> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/notfications.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />"Hey look, someone @replied me on Twitter!" Pull down the window shade, check it out, go back to browsing this month's custard calendar. "Oh hey, an email." Down comes the window shade, I reply, and then instantly return to drooling more over pumpkin-pie custard, before flipping to Google Talk to tell my friend when we're going to slaughter zombies in Left 4 Dead 2 demo. All in 10 seconds, while listening to Pandora radio.</p> <p>The drop down window shade is pure genius, and what makes the cacophony of background notifications from all the apps you've got running work. See, you don't actually close apps in Android like on the iPhone. You just switch between them, and the OS takes care of closing apps you haven't used in a while in the background. (Unless inside of an app, you explicitly tell it to shutdown, like Twidroid.) Anything a background app wants to tell you goes into the notification windowshade. Sure, there's a bit of lag switching back to the browser and then scrolling is choppy for a second on some phones, but it's a small price to pay. And bigger batteries in more recent hardware, like the Droid, are enough to make it through the day.</p> <h2>Android Takes More Work</h2> <p>Every version of Android gets a little smoother, a little more user-friendly, but stock versions are pretty barebones. Want to read a PDF attached to an email? You need an app. Visual voicemail? Gotta download it unless your carrier preinstalls one. Want a notepad? Find it on the Market. HTC takes care a lot of these little humps with their custom builds&mdash;which includes a PDF viewer out of the box, for example&mdash;and generally speaking, there's an app for the basic holes that need to be filled in, but get ready to do a little bit of legwork.</p> <h2>It's Not Quite as Secure</h2> <p>The lock screen is a series of swipes&mdash;not an actual passcode&mdash;and there's no remote wipe out of the box. Granted, with the iPhone you need a MobileMe plan to get remote wipe, but you don't have to look for an app to install, like <a href="http://download.cnet.com/SMobile-Security-Shield-for-Android-with-Remote-Wipe-and-GPS-Locate/3000-2056_4-10922286.html">SMobile Security Shield</a>.</p> <p>It's also less secure in the app department, at least on paper: Under Android, you can opt to install unverified programs through the settings menu. This may be a good thing to you&mdash;even your reason for switching&mdash;but it carries obvious extra risks.</p> <h2>The Android Marketplace Isn't as Nice as the App Store (Yet)</h2> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/androidmarket.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_androidmarket.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The only place to look for apps and install them is directly on your phone, through the Android Marketplace. With Android 1.6, the Marketplace did get a lot nicer to browse, with a new interface and actual app screenshots, but categories are still too broad, and you still can't do any of this on your desktop, where you have a much bigger screen. Updating apps? You've gotta do them one at a time, which is annoying.</p> <h2>The App Situation Is Getting Better, But Isn't There Yet</h2> <p>So here's the thing. The app ecosystem on Android has absolutely exploded, so it's much, much better place to be than it was six months ago, much less a year ago. In fact, for a lot of your everyday <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphoneapps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphoneapps/">iPhone apps</a>, there's now an Android counterpart or equivalent: Facebook, Pandora, Slacker, Remember the Milk, Foursquare, Shazam, Flixster, etc. The problem is, they're universally not as polished or full-featured. Facebook's missing messaging and events entirely; Twidroid, the best Twitter app, is hideous compared to any of the top 5 iPhone Twitter apps; Photoshop's lacks some of the effects it has on the iPhone.</p> <p>Gaming is probably the single biggest thing you'll miss. There are games, yes. Some of them good. There aren't as many and they're not as fantastic. There's nothing Star Defense caliber. <strike>Or Sim City.</strike> (<a href="http://store.handmark.com/p/111962/Android/SimCity-Metropolis-for-Android/">Oops</a>.) Partly, this is simply a numbers issue: Android's not as big as the iPhone yet. But the other aspect is that there's a serious storage limitation for apps&mdash;just 256MB in some phones&mdash;which seriously cramps what some games can do, as well as how many apps you can install on you phone. Apps will get better, the app economy will get better, this is true. But for now, be ready for some limitations and possibly, disappointments.</p> <h2>Music and Video? Just Buy a Zune HD</h2> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/musicandroid.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_musicandroid.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Kidding. Sort of. Getting music and video onto your Android phone is a purely drag and drop operation&mdash;there's no official Google sync application to organize and get your 10 gigs of music onto your phone. There is an Amazon MP3 store, and it's okay. There are third-party solutions, like DoubleTwist or Windows Media Player. But once you get the music on there, the music player itself kinda blows. It's ugly and just not very nice to use. On the upside, it plays Ogg Vorbis, open source fans.</p> <p>Movie watchers are in even worse shape with Android. Your best bet is to avoid the native player that's sort of hidden and to actually use a third party app, Meridian. Or just get a Zune HD for your music and video, and you'll be much happier.</p> <p>I think that covers the basics guys. Yeah, Android's not as polished or smooth, but you know what? It's actually quite livable over here. If there's something else you wanna know&mdash;or want to share&mdash;about switching, drop it into the comments. <iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/gadgets/The_iPhone_to_Android_Switch_10_Things_You_Need_to_Know" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398942/the-iphone+to+android-switch-10-things-you-need-to-know]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398942]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Android ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android 2.0]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Android apps]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone Apps]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:40:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398942&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Microsoft Confirms Improved Xbox 360 Warranty Seal [Blockquote] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>In an email exchange earlier today, Microsoft indirectly admitted that Xbox 360s are receiving <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397788/new-xbox-360-warranty-stickers-better-guarantee-chastity">an updated</a> tamper-resistant warranty sticker. From the company:</p> <blockquote><p>"We continually work on the security of our devices, including updates to the tamper seal. Beyond that, we have no further comment."</p></blockquote> <p>They also added that Steve Ballmer has always been a huge fan of stickers, having one of the most expansive collections in the world.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5399010/microsoft-confirms-improved-xbox-360-warranty-seal]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5399010]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Blockquote ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[360]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Xbox]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360 warranty seal]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360 warranty sticker]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:39:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399010&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Google Promotes Droid Day With Rare Homepage Ad [Google] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/DroidAd.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_DroidAd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hey Google! I adore your <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397485/cookie-monster-sang-about-google-27-years-ago">celebration of Sesame Street's 40th anniversary</a> and such things, but what are you doing sticking an ad on your homepage? An ad for Verizon's Droid of all things.</p> <p>It's a simple text link that leads to Google's <a href="http://www.google.com/mobile/partners/verizon/search.html">mobile partners page</a> which then has a link to the actual Verizon Wireless site. But despite that extra click, it's still incredibly rare to see any sort of ad on the otherwise clean homepage. Especially when it kinda conflicts with Google's attempts to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5377098/make-the-minimalist-fading-google-homepage-your-default">make the things even more minimalist</a> lately. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/06/google-pushes-droid-with-rare-ad-on-homepage/">TechCrunch</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398995/google-promotes-droid-day-with-rare-homepage-ad]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398995]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Google ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ad]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ads]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[google homepage]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Google homepage droid ad]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Google Mobile]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:22:59 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398995&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
    
			</channel>
</rss>