<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Cellphones]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/cellphones</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'cellphones']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Lost Decade in Mobile]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/hp_02.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />10 years ago, you could buy the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Hewlett-Packard-Jornada-Color-Pocket/dp/B00004TDL2">HP Jornada 548</a> with a color screen, which let you listen to MP3s, surf the web, check your email, and keep a calendar. It had a touchscreen. It ran Windows. It was awesome.</p>

<p>Today, you can buy a smartphone with a color screen, which lets you listen to MP3s, surf the web, check your email and keep a calendar. It has a touchscreen. It runs Windows. It does everything&mdash;everything&mdash;better than its ancestor did, in a much sexier hardware package. Plus it makes calls! It will cost you less than the $450 Jornada 548, though you'll probably have to sign a two-year cellphone contract. Amazingly, though, its software <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374876/windows-mobile-65-review-theres-no-excuse-for-this">looks and feels</a> <em>almost exactly the same</em> as its ten-year-old brother.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_sshot024.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
I don't just want to beat up on Microsoft here, because disregarding aesthetics and UX, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> has evolved a lot since it was just a twinkle in Windows CE's eye. But not as much as the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone">competitors</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android">around</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/webos">it</a>, and not fast enough to stay relevant. So instead of looking back, let's look forward: Microsoft, Windows Mobile 7, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile-7">whatever it is</a>, is your chance to win us back. The mobile space moves faster than it did back at the turn of the millenium, back when you had some of the best mobile software on the market, but it also has a shorter memory. Show us what you've got; we're eager to see it.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438096/microsofts-lost-decade-in-mobile]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438096]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[decades]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HP Jornada 548]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pdas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[y2k10]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438096&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Refuses To Send Stolen iPhone Back To Rightful Owner After Repair]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mission-impossible-iphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />When your stuff gets stolen, FILL OUT A <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #policereport" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/policereport/">POLICE REPORT</a>. <a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/12/customer-knows-her-stolen-iphone-is-being-sent-to-apple-but-apple-says-they-cant-return-it.html">Consumerist</a> reader Alisa is figuring this out the hard way after Apple received her stolen phone for repair. Even though it's clearly hers, they refuse to return it. <strong>UPDATED:</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>I got robbed on the subway in Brooklyn about 2 weeks ago, my iPhone (and some other crap)was taken. I called the police who were very helpful , they searched the area for a little bit, follow protocol and all that fun stuff.</p>
<p>Anyways, fast forward to yesterday when I get a email from Apple that someone had filed a request for a replacement phone due to a software malfunction from Apple CareService. I suspected that since I made an appointment with an Apple genius before, the Serial number on the phone was associated with my email. I called Apple to confirm this, after Apple and AT&T transferred me back and forth a few times I had the confirmation from the two companies the phone was mine , I had the address the service request was coming from (in the email) and a phone number (from an Apple rep).</p>
<p>I'm so excited that I can get my phone back! Until the cops arrive at my house, they tell me that since I didn't file a police report they can't do anything. I didn't file it because in order to file one, I would have had to go to a precinct downtown (like an hour away) look through books of pictures to try to ID the thief, whose face I only saw from the side for a millisecond. And really, what would a police report do for an iPhone that was stolen on a NYC subway a week before Christmas?(plus i had a final that night) The two officers also told me that even if I had a police report it would still be up to Apple and AT&T to decide how to proceed with the situation.</p>
<p>So I call AT&T... and over the course of 12 hours I speak to a bunch of people who are all very sorry that this is the situation I'm in, but their hands are tied &mdash; they have to honor the warranty and it does not matter that it's clear the phone is mine. They would need the authorities to tell them to do otherwise.</p>
<p>So I head to the police precinct where an officer calls the rep I spoke to last (aka the authorities speaking to Apple). The officer spends about an hour on the phone with Apple telling them that once the current holder of the phone ships the phone back to Apple, they should ship me the replacement. He gets the same answer I got&mdash;they will not do anything, they do not care that the person who has the phone currently is using a stolen phone and is not using it with AT&T (AT&T confirmed the phone # I got from the Apple rep is NOT an AT&T number).</p>
<p>It's not even about the phone anymore (I bought a blackberry&mdash;$600 is a TAD ridiculous for a new iPhone) its the principle of the situation, basically Apple is siding with someone who will most likely jailbreak the phone as opposed to helping a loyal customer (I've been using Apple products forever&mdash;iPods, Macs and iPhones (since the first gen)) who legally bought the phone from Apple and is using it with AT&T.</p>
<p>The whole situation is just illogical to me.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah, illogical is a good word. Absurd is another. Does anyone out there know if this is purely about not filing a police report, or is there some other reason why Apple is being such a dick about this? [<a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/12/customer-knows-her-stolen-iphone-is-being-sent-to-apple-but-apple-says-they-cant-return-it.html">Consumerist</a>]</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Shortly after sending the email to Consumerist, Alisa obtained a police report. Apple still refuses to do anything. Perhaps sending an email to sjobs@apple.com might remedy this situation, as this email is widely known to lead to a high level customer care service. Steve has even been known to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/308265/jobs-personally-tells-ipod-owner-that-missing-calendar-entry-was-a-bug">handle some issues personally</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437979/apple-refuses-to-send-stolen-iphone-back-to-rightful-owner-after-repair]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437979]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[police report]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[repair]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stolen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437979&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola's Rumored Superthin Android Phone Sounds Spectacular]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/mobile-01-motorola-shadow-mirage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mobile-01-motorola-shadow-mirage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We had few complaints with the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">Droid</a>, and the Sholes tablet, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5418629/leaked-motorola-sholes-returns-with-a-disturbing-lump-in-its-side">Occiphobic as it may be</a>, is lustable, without a doubt. But Motorola's alleged next phone, the .35-inch-thick, 1080p-capable Shadow/Mirage, makes Motorola's current Android lineup look old-fashioned.</p>

<p>All we've got for now is a crude rendering and a dubiously sourced Chinese leak, but given the recent spate of Snapdragon-powered Android phones, the specs are within the realm of plausibility: crammed into the slim body, there's a processor capable of decoding 1080p video, an 8-megapixel camera, and an HDMI port, masked by a 4.3-inch, 800 x 484 screen, as compared to the Droid's 3.7-inch display of the same resolution.</p>
<p>If true, this means that there's an Android phone that's at least as powerful as, and <em>thinner</em> than, Google's überbuzzed <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nexus-one">Nexus One</a> sitting <em>just</em> over the horizon, which strikes yet another blow to the mythos of the be-all, end-all Android device. [<a href="http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=423&t=1362866&last=16696674">Mobile1</a> via <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/12/31/fresh-out-of-china-emerges-the-motorola-shadowmirage-yet-another-motorola-android-handset/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437874/motorolas-rumored-superthin-android-phone-sounds-spectacular]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437874]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mirage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola mirage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola shadow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shadow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sholes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snapdragon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:59:14 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437874&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Guy Turns Dell Netbook Into 10-Inch Android Mini 3i Phone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_dell-netbook-mobile.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Ohoho, this is a mod that tickles my funnybone. Remember the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5349521/dell-mini-3is-first-clear-images-show-its-unholy-son-of-iphone-and-palm-pre">Dell Mini 3i Android phone</a>, destined for China only? Some dude has taken his Inspiron Mini netbook to pieces and turned it into his take on the Dell phone.</p>
<p>Because after all, who doesn't want a 10.1-inch Dell phone? Err... [<a href="http://shanzai.com/index.php/bandit-gadgets/phones/585-video-dell-netbook-to-dell-phone-mod">Shanzai</a> via <a href="http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2009/12/dell-mini-9-modded-to-look-like-dell.html">JkkMobile</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437720/guy-turns-dell-netbook-into-10+inch-android-mini-3i-phone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437720]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell inspiron mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell mini 3i mod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini 3i]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:20:45 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437720&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Logic Bolt's Second Projector Phone Makes The LG Expo Put Down The Cake]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_logic-bolt2.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Boy, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #logicwireless" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/logicwireless/">Logic Wireless</a> has been chomping down the slimming pills since we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5126754/logic-bolt-the-uss-first-projecting-cellphone">saw their first projector phone</a> a year ago. Just look at their svelte <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #logicbolt" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/logicbolt/">Logic Bolt</a> V 1.5 now!</p>
<p>The Symbian S60 phone beams images in VGA 640 x 480 resolution, with a diagonal dimension of 64-inches (4-inches more than the first Bolt model). Battery life is pretty poor though, with the 2hours of projecting only just enough time to watch a film. Unless you're projecting, you can get 3hours of talk time, or 200 - 250 hours of standby time.</p>
<p>A lousy 2.6-inch QVGA screen ensures you'll be watching all of your content via the projector function, though interestingly enough it also has a TV tuner, though we'll have to wait until CES next week to find out more about the specifics there. There's two cameras, the forward-facing camera is 1-megapixel and the back cam is 3-megapixel, and a microSD card slot is present for storing extra content.</p>
<p>Logic Wireless has promised to show off their second <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #projectorphone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/projectorphone/">projector phone</a> next week at CES, though with all these external projector add-ons <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5015339/portable-projector-for-iphone-is-concept-from-honlai">floating around for the iPhone</a> and other handsets, the need for a dedicated projector phone is diminishing by the minute. That goes for you too, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415331/lg-expo-its-got-a-pico-projector-bolted-to-the-back-of-course">LG</a>. [<a href="http://us.aving.net/news/view.php?articleId=142711&mn_name=">AVING</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437684/logic-bolts-second-projector-phone-makes-the-lg-expo-put-down-the-cake]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437684]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bolt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[logic bolt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[logic bolt v.1.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[logic wireless]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[projector]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[projector phone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:25:20 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437684&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ten Minutes With the Nexus One]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/nexus10min.jpg"></a><br>
<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="416" height="234" id="mbox_player_a697d7b81a1ce3cf29"><param name="movie" value="http://player.motionbox.com/VideoPlayer.swf?">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<param name="allowFullscreen" value="true">
<param value="video_uid=a697d7b81a1ce3cf29&security_token=prod3.e64ec94a5b7f0509&type=sd" name="flashvars">
<embed src="http://player.motionbox.com/VideoPlayer.swf?" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" width="416" height="234" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" name="mbox_player_a697d7b81a1ce3cf29" flashvars="video_uid=a697d7b81a1ce3cf29&security_token=prod3.e64ec94a5b7f0509&type=sd"></embed></object>We've <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5432678/google-nexus-one-hands-on">had our hands on</a> Google's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nexusone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nexusone/">Nexus One</a> phone, but weren't allowed to take any pictures. This fellow, on the other hand, managed to capture his playtime in a crisp, clear video which blows away any previous <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5432482/google-nexus-one-gets-extensive-interface-walkthrough">blurry clips</a>.</p>
<p>I think these ten minutes cover nearly the whole Nexus user interface and give a reasonable idea of what to expect when we finally get our very own gadgets to play with. Gorgeous!</p>
<p><i><b>Heads up:</b> There are a few not-so-safe-for-work seconds around the two minute mark. So you might want to skip over that if the boss is near (or if you don't enjoy Californication).</i> [via <a href="http://www.nowhereelse.fr/video-test-3d-nexus-one-phone-27858/">nowhereelse.fr</a>&mdash;<i>Thanks, Steve!</i>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437495/ten-minutes-with-the-nexus-one]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437495]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:48:37 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437495&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[HTC Russia Claims Only the HD2 Will Get a Windows 7 Upgrade]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/htctop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_htctop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #htcrussia" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htcrussia/">HTC Russia</a> claims in a <a href="http://twitter.com/HTC_Ru/status/7192147430">recent twitter post</a> that the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5400593/htc-touch-hd2-review-a-tragedy">HD2</a> will be the only HTC phone to get an upgrade to WinMo 7. All other phones will remain on Windows 6.5.</p>
<p>Translation:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>For Diamond 2 firmware is not planned. Of the existing communicators on the market, only the HD2 firmware to get WM7.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course, I really wouldn't qualify this as "official" just yet. [<a href="http://twitter.com/HTC_Ru/status/7192147430">twitter</a> via <a href="http://www.mobiletechworld.com/2009/12/30/htc-hd2-to-officially-get-windows-mobile-7-update/">MobileTechWorld</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437188/htc-russia-claims-only-the-hd2-will-get-a-windows-7-upgrade]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437188]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc russia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[winmo7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:08:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437188&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Innergie mCube Mini Is The World's Smallest Travel Charger For Laptops]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mcube_mini.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Innergie claims their new <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5117378/innergie-mcube90-is-a-small-sleek-energy+saving-power-adapter">mCube</a> Mini is the world's smallest travel charger for laptops. A very good thing, especially if you travel light. I refuse to pack more than one duffel bag no matter how long I'm away.</p>
<p>Specifically designed for cars and airplanes, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mcubemini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mcubemini/">mCube Mini</a> can be powered by either a 12V or a 15V outlet and can support netbooks and laptops that need up to 65W of power at 15-21V. It also has a USB port so you can charge other portable gadgets at the same time. Again, it's small&mdash;60 x 26 x 18mm to be exact, so it's fairly comparable in size to a typical cellphone. Available now for $70. [<a href="http://www.myinnergie.com/mCubeMini/default.aspx">Innergie</a> via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/innergie-mcube-mini-is-worlds-smallest-laptop-charger-for-auto-and-air-use-3067164/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+slashgear+(SlashGear)">Slashgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437151/innergie-mcube-mini-is-the-worlds-smallest-travel-charger-for-laptops]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437151]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[chargers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[innergie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mcube]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mcube mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[travel chargers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:58:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437151&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Palm Pre and Pixi "Plus" Coming to Verizon, and Soon]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_prepix.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #palmpre" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palmpre/">Palm Pre</a> is coming to Verizon early next year. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5383911/verizon-officially-confirms-they-will-have-the-palm-pre-early-next-year">We know this</a>. But this morning, BGR gives us something new to be excited about: The Pixi's apparently coming to Verizon as well, and <em>both</em> models get a (titular?) upgrade.</p>

<p>Verizon's lineup, according to BGR's tipster, will consist of the Palm Pre Plus (codenam: Russell) and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #palmpixi" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palmpixi/">Palm Pixi</a> (codename: Romo), which apparently look exactly like their non-plus predecessors, and will both run the currentl version of webOS, 1.3.5, at launch&mdash;a fact that jibes with the previously-announced "early next year" launch time, since Palm's been updating the OS at a steady clip.</p>
<p>So anyway, what's "Plus" about these phones? It could just be change in moniker, engineered by Palm and Verizon to inject a little energy into their existing lineup, but I'd expect something more more substantive: a faster processor, larger battery and in the case of the Pre, reengineered keyboard are all plausible guesses. Whatever it means, please, Palm, <em>please</em> don't tell me your CES keynote is just going to be a glorified carrier announcement. Palm needs new hardware. We need new hardware. Hardware! Ungghhhhhhhh. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/12/30/verizon-wireless-getting-palm-pre-plus-and-palm-pixi-plus/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437058/palm-pre-and-pixi-plus-coming-to-verizon-and-soon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437058]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:12:08 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437058&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: Two New Motorola Android Phones To Be Announced Next Week]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_motoenzo.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Motorola hasn't exactly been shy with telling people how many Android phones they'll be releasing in 2010, so it's no surprise to hear that they'll be showing off "a pair of new phones" at next week's CES.</p>
<p>We try to not put much weight on analysts' speculations, but Global Equities Research analyst Trip Chowdhry is confident that Motorola "may announce" two new Android phones, one on AT&T, the second on Verizon. Both will have, according to him, OLED screens and a slide-out QWERTY for the AT&T model, with the same handset shunning MOTOBLUR in favour of the Google Experiences interface.</p>
<p>Could that AT&T model be the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5428379/leaked-att-android-phone-looks-unexpectedly-like-a-crappier-motorola-cliq">Backflip/Enzo we've seen leaked pics of</a>? Though the screen doesn't sound like it's OLED, admittedly. Or perhaps the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5430385/sholes-tablet-gets-specs-and-press-shots-its-still-lumpy">Sholes</a> or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5431537/motorola-opus-one-specifications-leak">Opus One</a> will make a cameo next week? Stay tuned for our CES coverage, in any case. [<a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/12/29/motorola-2-new-phones-coming-at-ces/">Barron's</a>]</p>
<p><em>Image Credit: <a href="http://phandroid.com/2009/12/16/motorola-backflipenzo-pictures-details/">Phandroid</a></em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5436887/rumor-two-new-motorola-android-phones-to-be-announced-next-week]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5436887]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola android]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:55:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5436887&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[But Does It Play Duke Nukem 3D?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G1r-khgF6J8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G1r-khgF6J8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Yes, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417444/now-available">Nokia n900</a> runs <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dukenukem3d" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dukenukem3d/">Duke Nukem 3D</a> like a champ. Make sure to watch the clip to see for yourself, because this meme won't memify itself. [<a href="http://recombu.com/news/duke-nukem-3d-running-on-a-nokia-n900_M11275.html">recombu</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5436484/but-does-it-play-duke-nukem-3d]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5436484]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[duke nukem 3d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[n900]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia n900]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5436484&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Woah, That's a Lot of Android 1.5s and 2.0.1s]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/android_version_usage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_android_version_usage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Android Developers have published a chart breaking down platform usage based on visits to the Android Market for a 14-day period beginning on December 1st. The amount of 1.5s and 2.0.1s running out there is actually quite interesting.</p>
<p>The high 2.0.1 figure is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5420968/droid-gets-android-201-update-starting-today">a good indicator of how quickly the Droid has caught on</a>, which makes sense given all of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">positive hype</a>. However, the number of 1.5s running out there was kind of surprising&mdash;meaning that there are plenty of people out there with the HTC Hero, Droid Eris and the like&mdash;although updates to several phones in this category should be coming soon. [<a href="http://d.android.com/resources/dashboard/platform-versions.html">Android Developers</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5436583/woah-thats-a-lot-of-android-15s-and-201s]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5436583]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:54:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5436583&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The iPhone Is a Stone Cold Network Killer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/340x_netwok.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Being among the first of the world's networks to carry the iPhone practically guaranteed a flush few years. Also: network trouble! Take the UK's O2, whose spokespeople now seem to be reading from an apologetic PR script written by AT&T.</p>

<p>Addressing network congestion as the result of iPhone users utilizing data services <em>exactly as you'd expect them to</em>, O2's CEO Ronan Dunne <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3b911fd4-f41a-11de-ac55-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1">told the FT</a> (via <a href="digitaldaily.allthingsd.com">AllThingsD</a>):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Where we haven't met our own high standards then there's no question, we apologise to customers for that fact,</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Now, remember AT&T CEO Ralph de la Vega's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5422497/att-ceo-admits-att-sucks-solution-charge-more-money">qualified admission</a> about the general crappiness of the company's network in some major cities:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[It's] performing at levels below our standards.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So far, so familiar. Dunne takes the next step in what appears to be a step-by-step guide for carrier <em>mea culpas</em>, and claims that it's really not a huge deal:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>But it would be wrong to say O2 has failed its customers en masse</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Which, again, sounds extremely familiar. <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/12/09/att-to-new-york-and-san-francisco-were-working-on-it/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+wsj/biztech/feed+(WSJ.com:+Business+Technology)">AT&T</a>?</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We have 98.68 percent nationwide voice retainability, which means that the difference between AT&T and the industry leader is less than 2/10 of a percentage point on this important metric.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Finally, users get a ray of hope. Vague hope, but hope nonetheless:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[Dunne] said "any short-term blip" in O2 's "network reputation" would be "more than addressed" by three solutions to the difficulties.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>which corresponds rather neatly to:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This is going to get fixed," Mr. de la Vega said. "In both of those markets, I am very confident that you're going to see significant progress.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But it's not just the PR damage control that runs parallel here, it's the entire situation. O2, like AT&T, was the first carrier in its country to offer the iPhone, and the <em>only</em> one for quite a long time. iPhone users' increased data use was unprecedented in both markets, and brought the companies infrastructures, which were previously thought to be robust, to their knees. The next analog is how they somehow failed to predict this: they've known how data-hungry iPhone users are from the start, and they've been watching sales climb at a steady rate. So why weren't these carriers, two of the largest iPhone providers in the world, able to keep up?</p>
<p>That comes down to the last, most important parallel: they're both cheap. Like pretty much every carrier! Where they go from here looks like it could be different though, with AT&T hinting at "<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5423771/in-which-a-telco-executive-makes-taking-sound-like-giving">incentives</a>" to tamp down data use, and O2 admitting outright that this is an infrastructure issue that needs to be solved, which counts for <em>something</em>.</p>
<p>To be fair, it <em>is</em> the iPhone that caused their problems, with a potent combination of broad appeal and transparent, heavy data use. It's just the carriers' fault that they couldn't foresee that, or that they just <em>didn't care</em>. [<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3b911fd4-f41a-11de-ac55-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1">FT</a> via <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091229/iphone-strains-o2s-london-network/?mod=ATD_rss">AllThingsD</a>, <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/12/09/att-to-new-york-and-san-francisco-were-working-on-it/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+wsj/biztech/feed+(WSJ.com:+Business+Technology)">WSJ</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5436297/the-iphone-is-a-stone-cold-network-killer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5436297]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[carriers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[england]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[o2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:26:28 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5436297&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What The Future Of Touchscreen BlackBerrys Nearly Looked Like]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_mystery-bb.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Almost makes you like the Storm more, right? I'm guessing the (presumably resistive) touchscreen was so shoddy that the trackball was actually a required addition. Thank goodness this prototype didn't leave the R&D department. [<a href="http://www.pocketberry.com/2009/12/27/the-mysterious-blackberry-have-you-seen-me/">PocketBerry</a> via <a href="http://crackberry.com">CrackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5436090/what-the-future-of-touchscreen-blackberrys-nearly-looked-like]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5436090]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry touchscreen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:40:38 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5436090&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Doesn't She Look Thrilled About LG's First DTV Devices For The US]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_lg-lotus.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Yes, your eyes are deceiving you, LG's not licensed the StarTAC design. Phew. That telescopic antenna doesn't just harp back to ye olden days though, it also receives a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #digitaltv" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/digitaltv/">digital TV</a> signal, one of the first US DTV devices.</p>
<p>Joining the Lotus clamshell is the DP570MH <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #portabledvdplayer" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/portabledvdplayer/">portable DVD player</a>, which will play DVDs and over 800 channels of live digital TV thanks to the LG2160A ATSC-M/H chip, which LG's offered to Dell for use in its laptops, and manufacturers of in-car receivers such as Kenwood. The DVD player has a four hour battery life when playing TV, which is only two hours less than the iPod Touch.</p>
<p>I'm all for DTV devices, but surely LG could've picked a better handset to introduce to the US market, considering the Lotus has been floating around since the end of 2008? [<a href="http://www.lge.co.kr/cokr/pr/pr_news/FrontBoardDetailCmd.laf?mncode=NEWS&actcode=NEWS&seq=10656">LGE</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/29/lg-goes-nouveau-nostalgic-with-first-us-mobile-dtv-devices/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5436070/doesnt-she-look-thrilled-about-lgs-first-dtv-devices-for-the-us]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5436070]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dp570mh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg dtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg lotus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lotus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable dvd player]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:50:57 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5436070&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Algorithm Protecting GSM Calls Has Been Cracked]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_tinfoilpanic.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The A5/1 privacy algorithm, a code which is used to protect the privacy of about 80 percent of all mobile calls worldwide, has been deciphered and made public. It remains to be seen whether it's time to panic just yet.</p>
<p>The algorithm in question has been used to encrypt GSM calls since 1988, but this past week, at the Chaos Communication Congress, a four-day computer hackers' conference, an encryption specialist by the name of Karsten Nohl disclosed how he and about 24 other people cracked the code. He also revealed that the resulting two terabyte "code book" which is "a vast log of binary codes that could theoretically be used to decipher GSM phone calls" is available on various BitTorrent websites.</p>
<p>Whether you should begin to worry about this news depends on whom you listen to. The telephone companies are proclaiming that the A5/1 algorithm, a 64-bit binary code, will soon be phased out for its successor, the 128-bit A5/3 algorithm, and that even just a simple modification to the existing code would be enough to thwart any attempts to intercept calls.</p>
<p>Some security experts on the other hand are saying that the "hardware and software needed for digital surveillance were available free as an open-source product" and that this new development could "reduce the time to break a GSM call from weeks to hours."</p>
<p>Either way, it doesn't seem like it's time to shout about yet another breach of privacy just yet, so let's go back to focusing on <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5435117/the-unofficial-guide-to-flying">crotch pat downs</a> once again. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/29/technology/29hack.html?_r=3&src=sch&pagewanted=all">NY Times</a>]</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tabernadeingrid/4131242125/">Taberna de Ingrid</a></i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5435677/the-algorithm-protecting-gsm-calls-has-been-cracked]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5435677]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gsm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gsm code]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gsm code hacked]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hacked]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[telephony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:34:13 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5435677&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Mobicast Stitches Together Multiple Cell Phone Videos in Real Time]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/cellvids.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_cellvids.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If TMZ.com has taught us anything, it's that there's a lot of cell phone footage out there. Researchers at Microsoft's Labs in Egypt are doing <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18298-videostitched-cellphone-streams-go-widescreen.html">something cool</a> with all that content, combining feeds from multiple phones into multi-angle, live broadcasts.</p>
<p>Dubbed Mobicast, the system requires two sets of software, one for the phone and one for the server receiving the footage. When two or more phones are in the same place capturing the same scene, the software synchronizes their clocks so the framing lines up correctly. Image recognition technology on the server then figures out how the footage should physically mesh, using features of the landscape or scene to recognize parts of the images that match. It then blends the images to create a wider, more detailed view of the scene, sort of like PhotoSynth for video (but without the 3-D – for now).</p>
<p>The coolest part, of course, is that Mobicast can do all this in real time, so an event can be captured and broadcast live to the Web by several cameras at once. Users also receive feedback to their phones showing stills of the stitched video with their contributions highlighted, helping them to see how they can better position themselves for the best contribution.</p>
<p>Before going public, there are some issues to sort out, like how to tell if several phones are in the same vicinity filming the same scene (GPS?). Until then, all we can do is keep on filming and dream of the day that celeb scandals break in full 360-degree 3-D.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18298-videostitched-cellphone-streams-go-widescreen.html">New Scientist</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.popsci.com"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/logo-gawk.png" width="164" height="45"></a><i>Popular Science is your wormhole to the future. Reporting on what's new and what's next in science and technology, we deliver the future now.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5435335/microsofts-mobicast-stitches-together-multiple-cell-phone-videos-in-real-time]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5435335]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameraphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobicast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videophones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Dec 2009 09:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Popular Science]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5435335&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nexus One Dock Doubles Down on the Bluetooth]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_dockerton.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Most docks are little more than a plug with some extra plastic, but the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5432678/google-nexus-one-hands-on">Nexus One</a> dock, recently leaked by the FCC, has a bit more.</p>

<p>Bluetooth, in particular, is a notable addition in the dock (since Bluetooth is already in the phone). In other words, you're docking a Bluetooth device into another Bluetooth device. Why could this be?</p>
<p>Really, there are many explanations&mdash;and Bluetooth is cheap enough at this point that it need not be a luxury. Maybe HTC wanted you to have a headset that you kept at home. Maybe Bluetooth was chosen for remote accessories. Maybe Bluetooth just sounds cool to engineers.</p>
<p>Regardless, the thing'll have Bluetooth. Oh, and from the looks of it, the dock will hook into your home theater as well. [<a href="https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=969995&fcc_id=%27NM8CRB410">FCC</a> via <a href="http://androidforums.com/nexus-one/30026-scoop-nexus-one-dock-hits-fcc.html">AndroidForums</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/28/nexus-one-bluetooth-desktop-dock-clears-the-fcc-car-clip-spotte/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5435324/nexus-one-dock-doubles-down-on-the-bluetooth]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5435324]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus one dock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:07:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5435324&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The FCC Finds Verizon's Termination Fee Defense "Troubling"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/fcc1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_fcc1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Verizon's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5431184/verizon-defends-350-early-termination-fee-to-the-fcc">been defending</a> its ridiculous $350 smartphone <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #earlyterminationfee" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/earlyterminationfee/">early termination fee</a> to the FCC, but those folks aren't having any of it. In fact, the five-person committee dealing with the issue thinks Verizon's answers are "unsatisfying and, in some cases, troubling."</p>
<p>Mignon Clyburn, a member of that FCC committee, wrote a letter with a laundry list of issues she has with Verizon's treatment of its customers and makes it a point to say that she looks "forward to exploring this issue in greater depth with [her] colleagues in the New Year." Yikes. Not such great news for Verizon, but it could lead to some good for consumers. [<a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295371A1.pdf">FCC</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/fcc-commish-says-verizons-etf-response-is-unsatisfying-and-in/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5433421/the-fcc-finds-verizons-termination-fee-defense-troubling]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433421]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[early termination fee]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:04:05 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433421&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hack The Motorola Droid, Get Wi-Fi Tethering. Simples]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_droid-wifi.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Over at <a href="http://www.droidforums.net/forum/droid-hacks/10219-tether-capability-android-wifi-tether-wireless-tether-root-users.html">DroidForums</a> they've got a tutorial on how to hack your Droid to enable GUI Wi-Fi tethering, as Moto's Android may do many things, but it stops short at hooking up with your laptop or other wireless gadget.</p>
<p>Modder WebAcoustics says of the hack:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Please note that this involves rooting your phone, installing a custom recovery image, and a custom kernel. This is not for the faint of heart"</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If that doesn't intimidate you, then hop on over to DroidForums for the details. [<a href="http://www.droidforums.net/forum/droid-hacks/10219-tether-capability-android-wifi-tether-wireless-tether-root-users.html">DroidForums</a> via <a href="http://thegadgets.net/technology-news/breaking-news-technology-news/gui-based-wi-fi-tethering-now-possible-on-motorola-droid/">The Gadgets</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/motorola-droid-now-just-a-hacked-firmware-update-away-from-wif/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432924/hack-the-motorola-droid-get-wi+fi-tethering-simples]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432924]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola droid wi-fi tethering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tethering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:25:39 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432924&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Exclusive: Luke Wilson's Internal Motivational Speech to AT&T Troops]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="mbox_player_d497d0b21b1de3c85b" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="320" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=d497d0b21b1de3c85b&type=sd&security_token=prod3.3aebec94bf637daf">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed name="mbox_player_d497d0b21b1de3c85b" src="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=d497d0b21b1de3c85b&type=sd&security_token=prod3.3aebec94bf637daf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="320" allowscriptaccess="always" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/d497d0b21b1de3c85b.jpg"></a> This internal motivational speech by <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lukewilson" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lukewilson/">Luke Wilson</a> to the AT&T ground troops actually says little more than the obvious about celebrity endorsements, but it says something larger about morale inside of AT&T at the moment.</p>
<p>It can't be great, truthfully. Given the bad press and public sentiment toward AT&T, it's easy to see how troops on the ground, the real people who deal with us and our reception problems everyday, maybe aren't feeling so great about the company they work for. Like the guys who work at Goldman or Lehman Bros. who had nothing to do with the risky bets that blew up the economy, they were just doing their job.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432498/exclusive-luke-wilsons-internal-motivational-speech-to-att-troops]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432498]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[luke wilson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:51:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432498&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Are Smartphones a Weird Holiday Gift?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/smartphoooones.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_smartphoooones.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Naturally, manufacturers are pushing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411351/the-best-smartphones-on-every-carrier/gallery/">smartphones as big holiday gifts</a> this year. But how many of you are actually giving/receiving one?</p>
<p>I ask because smartphones have contracts, generally and because of that they seem like a complicated thing to gift. And a personal decision! What do you think about it?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432399/are-smartphones-a-weird-holiday-gift]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432399]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[question of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432399&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why Even Clumsy People Like You Would Have Trouble Breaking The Display On a Motorola Droid]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/gorilla_glass.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_gorilla_glass.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you were cursed with buttery fingers, you might want to consider what kind of display glass your gadgets are sporting. Devices like the Motorola Droid, Dell Adamo laptop and Cowon S9 PMP have added strength because of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #gorillaglass" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gorillaglass/">Gorilla Glass</a>.</p>
<p>Apparently, Gorilla Glass differs from the product you might find in a typical smartphone because it allows "larger ions to penetrate the surface more deeply to increase the compression tolerance and tolerate deeper scratches." This is achieved though a aluminum-composite composition that can be made extremely thin and light because of its strength.</p>
<p>Corning, the company behind the glass, is hoping to expand the reach of their product to other consumer electronics and even vehicles&mdash;anything that needs to withstand the elements. And by "elements" I mean clumsy, uncoordinated types...<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5219765/i-dropped-my-stupid-iphone-and-broke-the-stupid-screen">Adam</a>? [<a href="http://www.smartplanet.com/business/blog/smart-takes/the-science-behind-stronger-display-glass-on-your-phone-computer/2997/">Smartplanet</a> and <a href="http://www.corning.com/gorillaglass/index.aspx">Gorilla Glass</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432300/why-even-clumsy-people-like-you-would-have-trouble-breaking-the-display-on-a-motorola-droid]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432300]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glass]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gorilla glass]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:58:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432300&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone, Meet Razr: The Ten Most Popular Phones in the Country]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-22_at_1.15.03_pm_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />I have to admit I was surprised at the iPhone and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberry8300" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberry8300/">BlackBerry 8300</a> series did so well here&mdash;the two most popular handsets in the country, going into 2010, are full-fledged smartphones. Also surprising: people still buy Razrs. Razrs!</p>

<p>Motorola's fall from grace started when they couldn't come up with a serious successor to the megapopular original Razr, so it's kind of sad to see that right up until their Android renaissance&mdash;and maybe even through it&mdash;the Razr, now in version 3, is still a core part of their business. But there's a broader point here, about how people use their phones: there are still plenty of folks lingering in the dull, barely-connected land of the dumbphone, where LG appears to be King, but they're emigrating in droves, because they crave one thing: <em>internet</em>:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/screencap_2009-12-22_at_1.38.32_pm.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Smart, dumb, whatever: today, phones are for going online. Which, if you believe Nielson's scores, means phones&mdash;especially smartphone&mdash;are pretty much for <em>Google</em>. Now, get your pencils out, and let's draw a straight line between Google's dominance on the mobile web and the mysterious but very <em>real</em> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nexus-one">Nexus One</a>. Easy, wasn't it? [<a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-mobile-phones-sites-and-brands-for-2009/">Nielson</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432284/iphone-meet-razr-the-ten-most-popular-phones-in-the-country]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432284]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry 8300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry curve]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[most popular phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola razr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[razr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:41:37 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432284&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Play Us a Holiday Diddy on the HTC Mobile of Mobiles]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/mobile_mobile.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mobile_mobile.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Using 50 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #htctouch" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htctouch/">HTC Touch</a> handsets connected to computers with custom programming, James Theophane created a musical art installation that you can actually play via internet magic.</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8118831&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8118831&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/8118831.jpg"></a></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5432160,3,'Mobile Mobile');
</script></p>
<p>Just <a href="http://xmas.lbi.co.uk/mobiletree/">head on over to the live stream</a> and use the virtual keyboard to play a song, something resembling a song or a random and hideous mashup of notes that ruins the holidays for everyone. The installation will be on display at the Brick Lane Studio in London through January. [<a href="http://www.theophane.co.uk/mobile-mobile">Theopane</a> via <a href="http://www.switched.com/2009/12/21/a-mobile-of-mobiles-makes-cell-phone-holiday-magic/">Switched</a> via <a href="http://www.techeblog.com/index.php/tech-gadget/50-htc-touch-smartphones-used-to-simultaneously-play-christmas-songs">TechEBlog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432151/play-us-a-holiday-diddy-on-the-htc-mobile-of-mobiles]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432151]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432151&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[World's Stupidest Cellphone Thief Foiled By Victim's Brilliant Plot]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/phonejail.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_phonejail.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Peter Gamblin, a 24 year old former billiard champion in the UK, was busted for stealing a cellphone after the victim called him up and asked for his name and address.</p>
<p>Uh...yeah sure. That's Peter Gamblin...G. A. M. B. L. I. N.</p>
<p>According to the court, Gamblin gave the victim his name and address as an "act of bravado." It took a jury only 25 minutes to convict him. Needless to say, this guy is either the world's biggest moron (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5279210/murderer-caught-because-of-his-no-cellphone-left-behind-policy">next to this guy</a>) or he has a serious asshole friend that set him up to take the fall. [<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/6854280/Mobile-phone-thief-caught-after-answering-call.html">Telegraph</a> via <a href="http://www.fark.com/cgi/comments.pl?IDLink=4874222&tt=s">Fark</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5431293/worlds-stupidest-cellphone-thief-foiled-by-victims-brilliant-plot]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5431293]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone thief]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5431293&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is It the iPhone? Or the Network?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_Explosion-iphone_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />It's a funny thing. Right after AT&T's CEO <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5422497/att-ceo-admits-att-sucks-solution-charge-more-money">admits their network has problems</a> and the iPhone's shitty reception <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5430599/iphone-reception-an-easy-target-on-snl-weekend-update-last-night">becomes a late-night punchline</a>, AT&T crushes <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5428343/our-2009-12+city-3g-data-mega-test-att-won">our nationwide 3G test</a>. It makes you wonder, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5028749/question-of-the-day-hows-your-iphone-3g-reception">again</a>, is it the network, or the iPhone?</p>
<p>AT&T's network is generally reviled. Users of the iPhone, in particular, loathe it the kind of deep hatred reserved for people who steal from charities or beat up grandmothers. More specifically still, are people in New York and San Francisco, locations where even <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5422497/att-ceo-admits-att-sucks-solution-charge-more-money">AT&T Mobility's CEO admits</a> the network is "performing at levels below our standards." AT&T <a href="http://www.jdpower.com/telecom/ratings/wireless-call-quality-ratings-(volume-1)/">fares the worst</a> in JD Power's call quality ratings overall.</p>
<p>It's no secret that the iPhone isn't merely the embodiment of AT&T's network woes, but it's also, at least in part, the cause. The 3 percent of people responsible for 40 percent of the traffic on AT&T's network de la Vega is so fond of pointing the finger at are most assuredly iPhone users. AT&T notoriously didn't roll out MMS for the iPhone until this fall, not only months behind international carriers, but <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5352010/att-launches-iphone-mms-september-25">behind their own schedule</a>, because they needed "to make sure our network is ready to handle what we expect will be a record volume of MMS traffic." And iPhone tethering still isn't offered by AT&T, even though international carriers do, because it "could exponentially increase traffic on the network." Congestion is a very real problem on AT&T's network, even AT&T admits that.</p>
<p>Yet AT&T crushed our 3G tests all over the place, not just in their backyard of Atlanta. The major consideration is that we didn't use phones to test, but 3G sticks, and we only tested data. While coverage is inherently a part of the test&mdash;if we hadn't have gotten a signal in the places we tested, or the signal was shitty, it would've affected their placement in the test, obviously (just look at T-Mobile's results in some spots)&mdash;we were mainly testing for speed. The iPhone's problem is that it drops calls, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370493/apple-genius-bar-iphones-30-percent-call-drop-is-normal-in-new-york">frequently</a>, or simply doesn't connect. It has crappy reception. Other phones we've used on AT&T fare noticeably better. So it's easy, and obvious, to blame the iPhone, and its chipset <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/business/13digi.html?_r=1">as some have</a>. (We explain why cell reception isn't perfect across the board <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5195789/giz-explains-why-cellphone-reception-still-sucks">here</a>.)</p>
<p>But why isn't there an international outcry about the iPhone having garbage reception, then? It's possible, I suppose, that those networks have so much better coverage, even if the iPhone does have an inferior chipset with poor reception, it doesn't matter. It's just wrapped up in a blanket of coverage so comfy it still works fine. (And we have heard, though can't confirm, that the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone3g" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone3g/">iPhone 3G</a> at least used <a href="http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone-3G/600/3">an inferior, cheaper Infineon chipset</a> because AT&T wouldn't certify the one Apple actually wanted to use.)</p>
<p>So we have two contradictory piece of information. The iPhone does better internationally, and AT&T does better with other devices. So is it the network, or the phone? Probably a little of both. Help us out, engineers.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5431644/is-it-the-iphone-or-the-network]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5431644]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5431644&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Opus One Specifications Leak]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/motorola-opus-one_1_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_motorola-opus-one_1_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>When we say we have specifications, boy, do we mean it. One of our connects has sent us the full rundown on Motorla's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #opusone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/opusone/">Opus One</a> (their first iDEN Android handset) <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/12/06/motorolas-opus-one-first-iden-android-handset/">that we revealed</a> a little while back.</p>
<p>The features on the device are actually pretty reasonable, and we'd imagine it to sell for a reasonable attractive price-point at release. The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #motorolaopusone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motorolaopusone/">Motorola Opus One</a> will run Android 1.5 with iDEN service enhancements, make use of a "Zeus" CPU, and will feature a 3 megapixel autofocus camera.</p>
<ul>
<li>3.1″ hVGA 320×480 capacitative touchscreen display</li>
<li>3 megapixel autofocus camera with LED flash</li>
<li>Accelerometer</li>
<li>Proximity sensor</li>
<li>Wi-Fi 802.11b/g</li>
<li>Bluetooth</li>
<li>microSD card slot</li>
<li>2.5mm headset jack</li>
<li>Home, Menu, Back, Speaker buttons are capacitive buttons with haptic feedback</li>
<li>iDEN PTT &amp; PTX</li>
<li>Android LBS which is integrated into the iDEN GPS engine</li>
<li>"Enterprise email"</li>
<li>Plastic-molded housing with some rubberized texture finishes</li>
<li>58mm in width, 118mm in length</li>
<li>100g weight</li>
<li>512MB Flash / 256MB of RAM</li>
<li>64k and 128k iDEN SIM card support</li>
<li>A-GPS</li>
<li>Motorola dual-mic technology noise-canceling for noisy enviroments</li>
<li>Flash Lite v3.1.x</li>
<li>Some of the preloaded apps include: corporate email client with ActiveSync support, MOTONAV navigation app, barcode scanner, and document viewer.</li>
</ul>
<p>That's what we have for you on the Motorola Opus One at this time. Not the most mind-blowing Android device, but with it being an iDEN device and all, we'lll cut it some slack and even say that it could do reasonably well at launch.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/bg2.jpg" width="164" height="45"><i>BGR</i></a> <i>features the latest tech news, mobile-related content and of course, exclusive scoops.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5431537/motorola-opus-one-specifications-leak]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5431537]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Opus One]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Opus One]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:29:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boy Genius Report]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5431537&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Verizon Defends $350 Early Termination Fee to the FCC]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_verizon-sucks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Have you guys heard? Verizon <i>needs</i> to charge a $350 ETF on smartphones to survive! Otherwise they won't be able to pay for their network! Wait...that doesn't make any sense.</p>
<p>Yes, Verizon has responded to the FCC's inquiry with just what you'd expect: some pretty vague excuses. You see, they need to charge such a crazy ETF.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The higher (<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #earlyterminationfee" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/earlyterminationfee/">early termination fee</a>) associated with Advanced Devices reflects the higher costs associated with offering those devices to consumers at attractive prices, the costs and risks of investing in the broadband network to support these devices, and other costs and risks."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Costs and risks, costs and risks! What they don't address is why they're justified in charging a fee that ends up being far higher than the difference between the actual cost of a phone and the subsidized price, especially if the contract is cancelled many months in. Isn't that all the ETF is supposed to cover? I mean, if you're relying on contract cancellation fees to pay for your network, well, I don't think you need to have an MBA to figure out why that ain't good business. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703523504574604403213404482.html">WSJ</a> via <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/verizon-trys-to-convince-the-government-a-350-cancellation-fee-is-fair-2009-12">Silicon Alley Insider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5431184/verizon-defends-350-early-termination-fee-to-the-fcc]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5431184]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[early termination fee]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:48:37 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5431184&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google's Hype Generator, The Nexus One, Does Not Have Multitouch (In Browser and Maps)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_nexone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Another personal encounter with the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nexusone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nexusone/">Nexus One</a> is recorded in history forever, and while <a href="http://tnkgrl.wordpress.com/2009/12/18/exclusive-google-nexus-one-hands-on/">Tnkgrl</a> wasn't allowed to exercise her camera finger, she's written on her blog that it's "extremely thin," but more importantly, there's a severe lack of multitouch...<strong>UPDATE</strong></p>
<p>While she concedes that it's "much nicer looking in person," the lack of multitouch in the browser and Maps is a bummer. Here's what she noticed when having a fondle with the Nexus One:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>- It's much nicer looking in person than in pictures<br>
- There's a 4 GB micro-SD card installed<br>
- The battery capacity is 1400 mAh<br>
- The screen appears to be OLED (same size/resolution as the Motorola Droid)<br>
- 3G works on T-Mobile USA :)<br>
- I can confirm that there's no 3G on AT&T (EGDE only)<br>
- It's definitely unlocked<br>
- It's super snappy! Faster than the Droid…<br>
- There's no multitouch support in the browser or in Google Maps<br>
- There's no dedicated camera key, but it's the same camera interface as the Droid<br>
- The trackball can be used to focus (like on other HTC devices)<br>
- Low-light performance is decent, but the flash is weak<br>
- Calls are routed the normal way, not using data (VoIP), and sound fine<br>
- The home screen is divided into 5 panes (like the Sense interface on the HTC Hero)<br>
- It's using a micro-USB connector for data/power<br>
- There are some gold contacts at the bottom edge, for a dock perhaps?<br>
- Did I mention it's fast?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The lack of a camera button disturbs me, but other than that, it sounds like a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5426003/why-we-all-need-to-calm-down-about-the-real-google-phone">fairly ho-hum</a> Android phone. [<a href="http://tnkgrl.wordpress.com/2009/12/18/exclusive-google-nexus-one-hands-on/">Tnkgrl</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/googles-nexus-one-lacks-multitouch/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p>UPDATE: Alright commenters, you have your wish. Tnkgrl only said there's no multitouch support "in the browser or in Google Maps," which still doesn't eliminate the option of multitouch in other areas of the phone. And of course, it's still just early days yet&mdash;there's no reason to believe that Tnkgrl got her hands on a final production unit.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5429490/googles-hype-generator-the-nexus-one-does-not-have-multitouch-in-browser-and-maps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429490]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google nexus one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:00:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429490&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Palm Looking At Other Carriers; Faster, Snappier webOS 1.3.5 Update On Its Way Soon]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_palm-pixi-wood2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Hark! Did you hear the heralded Palm CEO <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jonrubinstein" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jonrubinstein/">Jon Rubinstein</a> confirm the webOS 1.3.5 update? It's on its way soon for all Pre and Pixi owners, and will gift a better battery life, more speed and stronger Wi-Fi.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5429124/palms-in+browser-app-factory-is-open-for-business">Ares app development program</a> will of course mean thousands more apps will be available for download, and the 1.3.5 update will help with installing them. As well as talking about the webOS update, Rubinstein also gave hope to non-Sprint fans everywhere, commenting:</p>
<p>"We don't believe in building large portfolios of products. Our focus is around having a small family of really great products. Right now we have two great products in Pre and Pixi and our objective right now is to expand with more carriers and more regions."</p>
<p>They'll probably hold off on releasing update 1.3.5 until CES, where they're expected to announce <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5427334/palms-going-to-have-something-at-ces-but-what">something</a> big. [<a href="http://www.precentral.net/palm-confirms-135-speed-battery-app-limit-all-be-improved-plus-investor-call-notes">PreCentral</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5429475/palm-looking-at-other-carriers-faster-snappier-webos-135-update-on-its-way-soon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429475]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1.3.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jon rubinstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm webos update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:20:26 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429475&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Palm's In-Browser App Factory Is Open For Business]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/ares_full.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_ares_full.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5398662/palm-gives-pre-developers-a-stupid+simple-tool-to-make-stupid+simple-apps">Ares pitch</a>: a stupid-simple way for developers to crank out webOS apps for the Pre and the Pixi, without ever leaving their browsers. It <em>looks</em> like a clever concept; we'll have to see if it actually works. <strong>UPDATED</strong></p>
<p>It works! I've never designed an app in my life, but that didn't stop me from creating a masterpiece in, like, four minutes.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/screencap_2009-12-17_at_6.16.05_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-17_at_6.16.05_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
As far as I can tell this is something like a full development SDK, insofar as the regular MojoSDK can be considered a full developement SDK. That is to say, while anyone with any development experience will have no problem creating apps with it&mdash;in fact, a layperson with a few spare afternoons could probably make <em>something</em>&mdash;they're still going to be of the same web-app-like caliber we've gotten used to in the App Catalog. Games, modal UIs, and a lot of the advanced features that make Android and iPhone apps shine are a little beyond Ares' reach, I think. Still, pretty cool stuff. [<a href="http://ares.palm.com/Ares/login.html">Palm</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5429124/palms-in+browser-app-factory-is-open-for-business]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429124]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ares]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm ares]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm ares sdk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:44:09 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429124&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Meet Your New Phone, The KINGK Autobot Nokia]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_kingkphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />This <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #kingkn99" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/kingkn99/">KINGK N99</a> phone has all the makings of a proper knock-off. It looks just like the Motorola AURA! It has a Nokia logo! It has a Transformers Autobot logo! It even has a 1.3 "magapixel" camera.</p>
<p>Just in case this KINGK tickles your fancy, you can import it from&mdash;where else&mdash;China for $159.99 now. Do let us know if it "caters to the taste of male friends" like it says on the website. [<a href="http://www.szprice.com/products/KINGK-N99-round-mirror-screen-Phone-with-dual-sim-dual-standby-voice-king_917.html">SZPrice</a> via <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/12/kingk_n99_from_china_must_love_the_autobots.html">UberGizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5428767/meet-your-new-phone-the-kingk-autobot-nokia]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428767]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fake]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kingk n99]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transformers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:20:22 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428767&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nexus One Google Phone Could Arrive on T-Mobile January 5th, Says 2nd Report]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_nexus_one.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />According to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BD49220091214">Reuters</a>, Google will have two versions of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/nexusone/">Nexus One</a>&mdash;one unlocked and one on a service contract with T-Mobile. The phone could be available directly from Google as early as January 5th.</p>
<p>They already <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9333009">had the January 5th date</a> a few days ago, so this second confirmation of the same date might make it a bit more legit.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"In the long term Google will become a seller and get commission from operators," the source said, adding that other operators are expected to follow T-Mobile's lead eventually and agree to Google's terms.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Reuters also quotes Baird Research analyst Will Power on how Google's choice to market their own phone shakes up the smartphone market, but mostly screws other Android makers:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We expect the launch of a new competitive device to be directionally negative for most of the existing smart phone markers, including Apple, Research in Motion, Nokia Oyg, HTC, Motorola Inc, Palm Inc, Samsung and others, while perhaps most negative for the existing Android partners."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If Google's choice to go the traditional route with carriers is true, it would, of course, dash any possibility that they might be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5428277/the-economics-of-a-free-google-phone">giving this thing away for free</a>. Let's just hope the unlocked version comes cheap. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BD49220091214">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5428847/nexus-one-google-phone-could-arrive-on-t+mobile-january-5th-says-2nd-report]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428847]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[googlephone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-moble]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:36:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428847&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[FSJ's Anti-AT&T Manifesto Makes Me Raise My Fist in Solidarity]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_att-deathstar.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #fakestevejobs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/fakestevejobs/">Fake Steve Jobs</a>' new <a href="http://www.fakesteve.net/2009/12/a-not-so-brief-chat-with-randall-stephenson-of-att.html">"chat" with AT&T's Randall Stephenson</a> from a few days ago has him hitting brilliant new heights. He really nails why AT&T's network failures are so infuriating. This is essential reading, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424620/fake-steve-a-not+so+brief-chat-with-randall-stephenson-of-att">if you missed it</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>While I'm ranting, let me ask you something, Randall. At the risk of sounding like Glenn Beck Jr. - what the fuck has gone wrong with our country? Used to be, we were innovators. We were leaders. We were builders. We were engineers. We were the best and brightest. We were the kind of guys who, if they were running the biggest mobile network in the U.S., would say it's not enough to be the biggest, we also want to be the best, and once they got to be the best, they'd say, How can we get even better? What can we do to be the best in the whole fucking world? What can we do that would blow people's fucking minds? They wouldn't have sat around wondering about ways to fuck over people who loved their product. But then something happened. Guys like you took over the phone company and all you cared about was milking profit and paying off assholes in Congress to fuck over anyone who came along with a better idea, because even though it might be great for consumers it would mean you and your lazy pals would have to get off your asses and start working again in order to keep up.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, this is in the arrogant, blustery Fake Steve voice, but make no mistake: there's nothing sarcastic about the message or the content here. [<a href="http://www.fakesteve.net/2009/12/a-not-so-brief-chat-with-randall-stephenson-of-att.html">Fake Steve Jobs</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5428690/fsjs-anti+att-manifesto-makes-me-raise-my-fist-in-solidarity]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428690]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fake steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428690&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Internet Service Outage Kills Email On Virtually Every Carrier Nationwide]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/bbstorm2_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />BlackBerry's BIS email servers have apparently shit the bed, big time: users across the country (and in Canada too!) are reporting that while internet services in <em>general</em> work, email has been out all morning. Berry havers: what say you? [<a href="http://crackberry.com/nationwide-bis-outage-reported-most-carriers">CrackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5428795/blackberry-internet-service-outage-kills-email-on-virtually-every-carrier-nationwide]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428795]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry outage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[research in motion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:11:42 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428795&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bloodhound Detector Sniffs Out Contraband Cellphones: Guess What They Smell Like?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/bloodhound-2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_bloodhound-2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>That's right...ass. Why? Because that's where inmates cram 'em. So it looks like the Bloodhound here will be pointing directly the backside of a lot of prison jumpsuits.</p>
<p>In all seriousness though, contraband cellphones are becoming a major problem in prisons throughout the country. One solution, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377311/senate-passes-bill-that-allows-cellphone-jamming-in-prisons">cellphone signal jamming</a>, has already been passed by the Senate. Bloodhound is intended to be an alternative to jamming&mdash;a device that sniffs out cellphone RF signals using a high speed scanning multi-band receiver harnessed to a DF-Direction Finding Antenna.</p>
<p>The problem with all of this is that prison guards would each need a detector, and they could only get results when the cellphones are actually in use. So, it seems like the best solution is still jamming cellphones en masse. In that scenario, the FCC would be required to lay out rules and ensure that legitimate communications are not blocked, which negates Bloodhound's one major advantage. [<a href="http://www.bvsystems.com/">BVS</a> and <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-bloodhound-cell-phone-detector-sniffs-out-contraband-cell-phones-in-correctional-facilities-and-prisons-79213227.html">PR Newswire</a> via <a href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091215/bloodhound-cellphone-detector/">Coolest Gadgets</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5428204/bloodhound-detector-sniffs-out-contraband-cellphones-guess-what-they-smell-like]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428204]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bloodhound]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bloodhound detector]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contraband]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[prison]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428204&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Where Do You Live and Which Phone Do You Use?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_phoness.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />A while back we saw charts of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404274/the-year-apple-and-rim-ate-everyone-elses-lunch">smartphone market shares</a> across the world, but now we want to know more. Specifically, we want to know more about Gizmodo readers. Which smart (or dumb) phones do you use? On which continent?</p>
<p>To help satisfy our curiosity (and maybe your own), head over to the poll corresponding to the continent you spend most of your time on and tell us which phone you use:</p>
<p>&bull; <b><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5427407/cellphone-poll-africa">Africa</a></b><br>
&bull; <b><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5427408/cellphone-poll-antarctica">Antarctica</a></b><br>
&bull; <b><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5427392/cellphone-poll-asia">Asia</a></b><br>
&bull; <b><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5427406/cellphone-poll-australia">Australia</a></b><br>
&bull; <b><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5427391/cellphone-poll-europe">Europe</a></b><br>
&bull; <b><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5427395/cellphone-poll-south-america">South America</a></b><br>
&bull; <b><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5427393/cellphone-poll-north-america">North America</a></b></p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/james_nash/1617392188/">James Nash (aka Cirrus)</a></i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5428074/where-do-you-live-and-which-phone-do-you-use]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428074]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[reader poll]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[telephony]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428074&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google: Hold Up, There Aren't That Many Android Apps]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5426963/the-android-market-is-getting-ready-to-explode">report</a> from Android tracking site AndroLib that the Android Market had probably surpassed 20,000 apps was heartening for Android users and industry watchers alike. Minor issue! According to Google, they overshot the figure<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/16/google-android-market/"> by about 20%</a>. Still, the current count of 16,000 apps sit on a pretty <em>healthy</em> growth curve, if not a particularly steep one. So anyway, continue to party! Just a little less hearty. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/16/google-android-market/">MobileCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5428079/google-hold-up-there-arent-that-many-android-apps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428079]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android app market]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[App MArket]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:52:51 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428079&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Type n Walk App Lets You See Where You're Going While Texting]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GZf3pmB_bE4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GZf3pmB_bE4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Texting while walking is dangerous, as you can't see what's in front of you. The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #typenwalk" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/typenwalk/">Type n Walk</a> iPhone app, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5195440/despite-being-an-april-1-gag-txtnwalk-mobile-app-is-sweet">as predicted on April 1st</a>, solves that by using the camera to make the phone transparent. Sigh. [<a href="http://www.type-n-walk.com/">TypeNWalk</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/12/15/type-n-walk-mobile-a.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+%28Boing+Boing%29">BoingBoing</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5427944/type-n-walk-app-lets-you-see-where-youre-going-while-texting]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5427944]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[type n walk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5427944&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
