<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Cellphones]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/cellphones</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'cellphones']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DIY Star Trek Bluetooth Communicator Almost Makes Regular Bluetooth Headsets Look Stylish]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TueSAiSGWTs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TueSAiSGWTs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>This DIY <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a> Bluetooth Communicator instantly reminded me of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372521/fabric-antenna+based-personal-communicator-makes-most-of-my-star-trek-fantasies-reality#c15756632">a comment</a> a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/people/omg-ponies/">dear reader</a> left <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372521/fabric-antenna+based-personal-communicator-makes-most-of-my-star-trek-fantasies-reality">when I shared a Star Trek fantasy</a>. He was right: Bluetooth is the ruin of Star Trek. But this is a fun quick-n-dirty project.</p>
<p>Basically you're cramming a Bluetooth module and a microcontroller into a toy Communicator and then pairing everything with your phone. As long as you've got voice dialing, you can leave your phone out of sight and be the snazziest Trekkie on the streets. Just don't come crying to me if someone stuffs you into a locker, trashcan, or wormhole. [<a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/11/star_trek_bluetooth_communicator.html">Make</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398946/diy-star-trek-bluetooth-communicator-almost-makes-regular-bluetooth-headsets-look-stylish]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398946]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[communicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy bluetooth star trek communicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398946&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The iPhone-to-Android Switch: 10 Things You Need to Know]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Switch_Feiss_Android_Like.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Switch_Feiss_Android_Like.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You've had it. Maybe with AT&T. Maybe with Apple's crushing, dictatorial grip strangling the App Store. Whatever the reason, you're going to Android: Land of freedom, carriers not named AT&T, and the great Google. Here's what you need to know.</p>

<h2>It's All in the Google Cloud</h2>
<p>Android phones don't sync with your computer. That's because they don't have to: Your contacts, calendar and mail are all kept up in the great Googleyplex. Unfortunately, Google's Contacts manager, while it's gotten better, is kinda crappy, and all of your Contacts are beamed down to your phone from there.</p>
<p>So even after you get the actual contacts you wanna talk to exported to Google Contacts, one problem is that all of your Google contacts, like <em>everybody</em> you email, show up on your phone. What you have to do is either sort your contacts into different groups and tell the phone's Contacts app to show only the groups you only wanna see, or to only show you people with phone numbers. If you wanna sync your contacts, so you have a master copy on your computer and can manage them from there, that problem takes a bit of legwork&mdash;at least on Windows.</p>
<p>If you're on a Mac, it's easy to keep your Contacts synced&mdash;just tell Address Book to sync with Google. On Windows, you'll need a third-party app, like <a href="http://www.webgear.co.nz/Products/GOContactSync.aspx">GO contact</a>. That way, you can manage your contacts on your desktop, and have a local copy that's always synced up with what Google's got.</p>
<p>Calendars are easier: Google's got <a href="http://www.google.com/sync/pc.html">an app</a> for that.</p>
<p>Exchange support varies from version to version: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android20" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android20/">Android 2.0</a> has it, previous vanilla versions of Android don't, but carriers like Sprint and hardware makers like HTC have been rolling their own Exchange solution into Android. Check the box, in other words.</p>
<h2>The Gmail App Is Amazing</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gmailbig2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_gmailbig2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If your primary email account is Gmail, that's almost reason enough to go Android. Not only is Gmail pushed to your phone, the Gmail app is an absolutely perfect rendition of the Gmail experience for the small screen. Threaded conversations (hurray), full label support, starring, archiving and a true Gmail look-and-feel. It's even better in Android 2.0, which finally includes support for using multiple Google accounts with the Gmail app, and a few interface tweaks to make it easier to use.</p>
<p>For your non-Google accounts, there's a separate email app that's a pretty standard IMAP/POP mobile email app. Not amazing, not bad.</p>
<h2>For That Matter, All of the Google Apps Are Amazing</h2>
<p>You might be switching to Android for political reasons, or just to get away from AT&T, but what's gonna make switching actually <em>work</em> is that all of the Google services are fantastic, and often, more powerful than their iPhone counterparts.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gtalk.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_gtalk.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Google Talk is the non-Gmail killer app for me, and highlights just how badly the iPhone needs a native messaging app&mdash;it's like BlackBerry Messenger, but for Google. (Or mobile AIM, but less shitty.) Keep in mind, anyone signed in to Gmail on a desktop browser can be reached through Google Talk if they've authorized it, so you've probably got more "buddies" than you might realize.</p>
<p>Latitude is actually built into the Maps app; Google Voice integrates seamlessly; and Google actually frequently releases updates them the Android Marketplace. Oh, and did I mention Google Navigation? Yeah.</p>
<p>What Google hasn't gotten around to yet is integrating Google Docs, but the web version with Android's HTML5-superpowered browser is pretty good.</p>
<h2>Not Being on AT&T Is Just as Liberating As You'd Hoped</h2>
<p>I've never had full bars on any Android phone&mdash;on T-Mobile, Sprint or Verizon&mdash;and not been able to do something online. End of story.</p>
<h2>Multitasking Is All It's Cracked Up to Be, Mostly</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/notfications.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />"Hey look, someone @replied me on Twitter!" Pull down the window shade, check it out, go back to browsing this month's custard calendar. "Oh hey, an email." Down comes the window shade, I reply, and then instantly return to drooling more over pumpkin-pie custard, before flipping to Google Talk to tell my friend when we're going to slaughter zombies in Left 4 Dead 2 demo. All in 10 seconds, while listening to Pandora radio.</p>
<p>The drop down window shade is pure genius, and what makes the cacophony of background notifications from all the apps you've got running work. See, you don't actually close apps in Android like on the iPhone. You just switch between them, and the OS takes care of closing apps you haven't used in a while in the background. (Unless inside of an app, you explicitly tell it to shutdown, like Twidroid.) Anything a background app wants to tell you goes into the notification windowshade. Sure, there's a bit of lag switching back to the browser and then scrolling is choppy for a second on some phones, but it's a small price to pay. And bigger batteries in more recent hardware, like the Droid, are enough to make it through the day.</p>
<h2>Android Takes More Work</h2>
<p>Every version of Android gets a little smoother, a little more user-friendly, but stock versions are pretty barebones. Want to read a PDF attached to an email? You need an app. Visual voicemail? Gotta download it unless your carrier preinstalls one. Want a notepad? Find it on the Market. HTC takes care a lot of these little humps with their custom builds&mdash;which includes a PDF viewer out of the box, for example&mdash;and generally speaking, there's an app for the basic holes that need to be filled in, but get ready to do a little bit of legwork.</p>
<h2>It's Not Quite as Secure</h2>
<p>The lock screen is a series of swipes&mdash;not an actual passcode&mdash;and there's no remote wipe out of the box. Granted, with the iPhone you need a MobileMe plan to get remote wipe, but you don't have to look for an app to install, like <a href="http://download.cnet.com/SMobile-Security-Shield-for-Android-with-Remote-Wipe-and-GPS-Locate/3000-2056_4-10922286.html">SMobile Security Shield</a>.</p>
<p>It's also less secure in the app department, at least on paper: Under Android, you can opt to install unverified programs through the settings menu. This may be a good thing to you&mdash;even your reason for switching&mdash;but it carries obvious extra risks.</p>
<h2>The Android Marketplace Isn't as Nice as the App Store (Yet)</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/androidmarket.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_androidmarket.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The only place to look for apps and install them is directly on your phone, through the Android Marketplace. With Android 1.6, the Marketplace did get a lot nicer to browse, with a new interface and actual app screenshots, but categories are still too broad, and you still can't do any of this on your desktop, where you have a much bigger screen. Updating apps? You've gotta do them one at a time, which is annoying.</p>
<h2>The App Situation Is Getting Better, But Isn't There Yet</h2>
<p>So here's the thing. The app ecosystem on Android has absolutely exploded, so it's much, much better place to be than it was six months ago, much less a year ago. In fact, for a lot of your everyday <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphoneapps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphoneapps/">iPhone apps</a>, there's now an Android counterpart or equivalent: Facebook, Pandora, Slacker, Remember the Milk, Foursquare, Shazam, Flixster, etc. The problem is, they're universally not as polished or full-featured. Facebook's missing messaging and events entirely; Twidroid, the best Twitter app, is hideous compared to any of the top 5 iPhone Twitter apps; Photoshop's lacks some of the effects it has on the iPhone.</p>
<p>Gaming is probably the single biggest thing you'll miss. There are games, yes. Some of them good. There aren't as many and they're not as fantastic. There's nothing Star Defense caliber. <strike>Or Sim City.</strike> (<a href="http://store.handmark.com/p/111962/Android/SimCity-Metropolis-for-Android/">Oops</a>.) Partly, this is simply a numbers issue: Android's not as big as the iPhone yet. But the other aspect is that there's a serious storage limitation for apps&mdash;just 256MB in some phones&mdash;which seriously cramps what some games can do, as well as how many apps you can install on you phone. Apps will get better, the app economy will get better, this is true. But for now, be ready for some limitations and possibly, disappointments.</p>
<h2>Music and Video? Just Buy a Zune HD</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/musicandroid.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_musicandroid.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Kidding. Sort of. Getting music and video onto your Android phone is a purely drag and drop operation&mdash;there's no official Google sync application to organize and get your 10 gigs of music onto your phone. There is an Amazon MP3 store, and it's okay. There are third-party solutions, like DoubleTwist or Windows Media Player. But once you get the music on there, the music player itself kinda blows. It's ugly and just not very nice to use. On the upside, it plays Ogg Vorbis, open source fans.</p>
<p>Movie watchers are in even worse shape with Android. Your best bet is to avoid the native player that's sort of hidden and to actually use a third party app, Meridian. Or just get a Zune HD for your music and video, and you'll be much happier.</p>
<p>I think that covers the basics guys. Yeah, Android's not as polished or smooth, but you know what? It's actually quite livable over here. If there's something else you wanna know&mdash;or want to share&mdash;about switching, drop it into the comments. <iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/gadgets/The_iPhone_to_Android_Switch_10_Things_You_Need_to_Know" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398942/the-iphone+to+android-switch-10-things-you-need-to-know]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398942]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android 2.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398942&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Promotes Droid Day With Rare Homepage Ad]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/DroidAd.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_DroidAd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hey Google! I adore your <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397485/cookie-monster-sang-about-google-27-years-ago">celebration of Sesame Street's 40th anniversary</a> and such things, but what are you doing sticking an ad on your homepage? An ad for Verizon's Droid of all things.</p>
<p>It's a simple text link that leads to Google's <a href="http://www.google.com/mobile/partners/verizon/search.html">mobile partners page</a> which then has a link to the actual Verizon Wireless site. But despite that extra click, it's still incredibly rare to see any sort of ad on the otherwise clean homepage. Especially when it kinda conflicts with Google's attempts to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5377098/make-the-minimalist-fading-google-homepage-your-default">make the things even more minimalist</a> lately. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/06/google-pushes-droid-with-rare-ad-on-homepage/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398995/google-promotes-droid-day-with-rare-homepage-ad]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398995]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google homepage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google homepage droid ad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:22:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398995&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Worst Gadget Ripoff I've Seen Today]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_iphoneclone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Allow me to introduce the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hipodphone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hipodphone/">Hi-Pod phone</a>. It comes with a one-inch LCD display, FM radio support, and an imitation iPod clickwheel stuck onto a hideously clunky chunk of plastic. It's $85 and doesn't work in the US or Canada.</p>
<p>If for whatever reason this piece of junk appeals to you, you can order it straight from China Grabber's vaguely shady-looking website, but I would suggest that you use the money to get your head examined instead. [<a href="http://chinagrabber.com/1-0-display-screen-dual-band-ipod-style-phone-w-mp3-gprs-fm-record-dual-card-dual-standby---f518-hi-pod.aspx">ChinaGrabber</a> via <a href="http://www.pmptoday.com/2009/11/04/f518-hipod-duet-mobile-phone-breaks-out/">PMP</a> via <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/11/hi-pod_is_not_an_ipod_clone.html">Uber Gizmo</a> via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/11/hi-pod-more-hah.php">Device</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398827/the-worst-gadget-ripoff-ive-seen-today]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398827]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[F518]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hi-pod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hi-pod phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone clone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod clone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398827&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Another iPhone Developer Gets Busted Stealing Phone Numbers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/worldwar.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />iPhone game developer Storm8, creator of games such as World War, iMobsters and Vampires Live, has just been hit with a suit for secretly gathering the phone numbers of everyone who purchases its games.</p>
<p>It's not the first time we've seen this; Swiss developer<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370323/iphone-app-developer-jacks-your-phone-number-to-pitch-you-more-apps">Mogo</a> got busted gathering numbers and then calling people to harass them to buy more apps, which is certainly a more brazen move. Storm8 claims that this was a bug, but they're getting sued anyways. It doesn't pay to be shady, devs! [<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/05/iphone-game-dev-accu.html">Boing Boing</a> via <a href="http://kotaku.com/5398364/iphone-games-caught-stealing-phone-numbers">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398755/another-iphone-developer-gets-busted-stealing-phone-numbers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398755]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm8]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:14:07 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398755&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Palm Gives Pre Developers a Stupid-Simple Tool to Make Stupid-Simple Apps]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/palmpre_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />It's no secret that Palm's been taking it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374793/palm-couldnt-pick-a-better-first-paid-webos-app-than-air-hockey">niiiice 'n slow</a> with their app strategy, whatever it is. Here's their next baby step: <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/181552/palm_shows_ares_webos_development_tool.html">Ares</a>, a browser-based, drag-and-drop development toolkit for making simple apps. It's a marginally good idea!</p>

<p>In a way, software written in Ares is the purest kind of web app: It's designed <em>in</em> a browser, written in web languages and rendered like a webpage. In another, it's not, because the tools packages these things like native apps. As weirdly hybrid as the results are, Palm reasoning is straightforward: They want to "help Web developers make the leap to becoming mobile developers." You know, by making web development <em>in</em>to app development, even moreso that webOS and the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mojosdk" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mojosdk/">Mojo SDK</a> already do. Ok!</p>
<p>The tool will be available by the end of the year, Palm says, but it's not clear what effect it'll actually have. The hope is that it'll spur development for a platform that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378390/the-app-effect">runs the risk</a> of scaring would-be developers away with its limited user base. The <em>fear</em> is that by encouraging the development of nicely-wrapped web apps before they have a steady stream of regular apps, Palm is dooming the Pre and Pixi to wallow in a sea of $1 farts and spam. I'm taking bets, in the comments. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/181552/palm_shows_ares_webos_development_tool.html">PC World</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398662/palm-gives-pre-developers-a-stupid+simple-tool-to-make-stupid+simple-apps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398662]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ares]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ares sdk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mojo sdk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm ares]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:28:18 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398662&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Inventor of Cellphones Says They've Become Too Complicated]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_MartinCooper.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />I love that smartphones let me avoid cramming my pockets with extra gadgets like an MP3 player or camera. But Dr. Martin Cooper&mdash;the former lead engineer of the Motorola team that developed the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/357895/the-analog-cellphone-timeline">first cellphone</a>&mdash;reckons that's just phooey.</p>
<p>The 80 year old inventor, who has also criticized the iPhone as being overly complicated and hard to use, told a privacy conference in Madrid this week:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Whenever you create a universal device that does all things for all people, it does not do any things well. Our future I think is a number of specialist devices that focus on one thing that will improve our lives."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I hear the basic point: jacks of all trades tend to be masters of none. And that's a valid observation. But a bunch of smartphones and mobile OSes now do a decent job of handling music, and their cameras are getting better, too. Not to forget all the goodness from Web-based services. So with the utmost of respect good sir, this isn't the 1980s, and using an iPhone (or any smartphone for that matter) is no longer like trying to program your VCR. [<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/6509126/Inventor-of-mobile-phones-says-they-have-become-too-complicated.html">The Telegraph</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398540/inventor-of-cellphones-says-theyve-become-too-complicated]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398540]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[martin cooper cell phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:36:22 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398540&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giz Explains: Android, and How It Will Take Over the World]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/androids_taking_over.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_androids_taking_over.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This week we met Motorola's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review?skyline=true&s=x">Droid</a>, the first handset with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android20" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android20/">Android 2.0</a>. To an outsider, it just looks like another Google smartphone, but 2.0 is more than that: it's proof that Android is finally going to take over the world.</p>
<h2>So Wait, What <em>Is</em> Android, Exactly?</h2>
<p>In Google's words, it's "the first truly open and comprehensive platform for mobile devices." That doesn't mean much, so here's a breakdown: It's a Linux-based, open-source mobile OS, complete with a custom window manager, modified Linux 2.6 kernel, WebKit-based browser and built-in camera, calendar, messaging, dialer, calculator, media player and album apps. If that sounds a little sparse, that's because it is: Android on its own doesn't amount to a whole lot; in fact, a phone with plain vanilla Android wouldn't feel like a smartphone at all. Thankfully, these phones don't exist.</p>
<p>Android is Linux insofar as its core components are open-source and free, and Google must publish their source code with every release. But the real heart of the Android phone experience&mdash;the Google apps like Maps, GChat, Gmail, Android Market, Google Voice, Places and YouTube are closed-source, meaning Google <em>owns them outright</em>. Every Google phone comes with these apps in one form or another so to the user this distinction isn't that important. That said, it occasionally rears its head, like when Android modder Cyanogen had to strip the apps out of his custom Android builds to avoid getting <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5369726/cyanogen-custom-android-builds-will-live-on-sans-google-apps">sued by Google</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The issue that's raised is the redistribution of Google's proprietary applications like Maps, GTalk, Market, and YouTube. They are Google's intellectual property and I intend to respect that. I will no longer be distributing these applications as part of CyanogenMod.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This can lead to more mainstream (and confusing) issues, like with the, erm, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5142445/dissecting-apples-multitouch-patent-can-it-stop-palm">touchy</a> (sorry!) multitouch issue: Android OS supports multitouch, in that it can recognize multiple simultaneous input points on its screen. But Google's Android apps <em>don't</em>. So when a company like HTC comes along and decides to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5318860/htc-hero-review-ambitious-but-tragically-flawed">properly add multitiouch to the OS</a>, they can only add it to the open-source parts, like the browser (or their own closed-source apps), not Google's proprietary apps. That's why the Hero has pinch-zoom in its browser and photo albums but not in Google Maps, where it's just as at home.</p>
<p>The issue gets even less trivial as the apps grow more central to the Android experience. You know how Google Maps Navigation was, like, <em>the</em> banner feature for Android 2.0? Well, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393935/google-navigator-for-android-review-good-for-free-but-far-from-perfect">it was</a>, but technically speaking, it's not a part of Android. It's just part of an app made by Google for Android, and that'll ship with most Android handsets. Except for in countries where Google doesn't have their mapping data quite together enough, where it won't. That's what's happening with the Euro Droid, which, by the way, <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/motorola-milestone-aka-gsm-droid-adds-multitouch-video-0262450/">does</a> have multitouch in its browser, like the Hero. <em>That's</em> why the distinction matters.</p>
<p>So, why take so much care to set up and protect this open source component, when surely Google could just slap together a closed-source mobile operating system and give it away for free, right? It would deprive handset manufacturers of their ability to freely modify certain core components of the OS, sure, but the real reasoning, oddly enough, has less to do with phones and more to do with, well, everything else.</p>
<h2>How We Got Here</h2>
<p>Flash back to November 7th, 2007, when the Open Handset Alliance, a massive coalition of mobile industry companies, held hands to announce to the world their new child. His name was Android, and we were told very little about him. What we were told, though, was delivered almost entirely in frustratingly vague platitudes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Handset manufacturers and wireless operators will be free to customize Android in order to bring to market innovative new products faster and at a much lower cost. Developers will have complete access to handset capabilities and tools that will enable them to build more compelling and user-friendly services, bringing the Internet developer model to the mobile space.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We were a little disappointed that the GPhone wasn't strictly a phone, but like most people, this <a href="http://gizmodo.com/318862/gphone-is-official-+-a-software-platform-for-cellphones">sounded exciting to us</a>. Vague, but exciting.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/thumb160x_by_default_2009-11-04_at_7.29.11_PM.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />And so we waited, patiently. And waited. Then, nearly a year later, we got our hands on the first hardware to actually use Android. It was called the T-Mobile G1, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062977/t+mobile-g1-google-android-phone-review">It Was Good</a>. Then, six months later, we got another phone&mdash;the Magic, or MyTouch, which was more or less exactly like the first one, minus a keyboard. It wasn't until two full years since Android's first appearance&mdash;when not just HTC but Motorola, Samsung and Sony started showing off fresh wares&mdash;that Android began to feel like more than an experiment. And more important than getting fresh hardware, Android's OS had changed too. A lot.</p>
<p>The T-Mobile G1 shipped with Android 1.0, which wasn't exactly missing much, but still felt a bit barebones. We had to wait until February of 2009 for paid apps to show up in the Android Market, after which April saw the first major update, Android 1.5 "Cupcake." (Updates each have alphabetical, pastry-themed codenames.) This was followed by 1.6 "Donut," which most new handsets are shipping with now, then 2.0 (yes, "Eclair"), which throws in social networking integration, an interface lift, support for new device resolutions, a fresh developer SDK and support for the optional Google Maps Navigation. This version is currently only found on the Motorola Droid, but should start showing up elsewhere with a few months. And so here we are. And that's just half of it.</p>
<h2>Android Isn't Just a Phone OS</h2>
<p>That announcement I showed you earlier? That was from the Open Handset alliance, a consortium of phone folks&mdash;handsets manufacturers, mobile chip makers and the like. But let's look back at another announcement, from the Android project leads, <a href="http://source.android.com/posts/opensource">back in early 2008</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Android is not a single piece of hardware; it's a complete, end-to-end software platform that can be adapted to work on any number of hardware configurations. Everything is there, from the bootloader all the way up to the applications...Even if you're not planning to ship a mobile device any time soon, Android has a lot to offer. Interested in working on a speech-recognition library? Looking to do some research on virtual machines? Need an out-of-the-box embedded Linux solution? All of these pieces are available, right now, as part of the Android Open Source Project, along with graphics libraries, media codecs, and some of the best development tools I've ever worked with.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Almost all the talk about Android over the last two years has been about Android the <em>phone OS</em>, not Android the lightweight Linux distribution. While Google was busy pumping out high-profile phone-centric updates, Android was starting to creep into other industries, like a disease. A good disease, that everyone likes! Yes, one of those. This is where things get weird.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/4A.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_4A.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Remember all those not-quite-there <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381868/acer-aspire-one-aod250-boots-android-and-win-xp-holds-us-over-until-chrome-os-arrives">Android netbooks</a>? Part of the plan. The Android-powered Barnes & Noble <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nook">Nook</a>? Shouldn't have been a surprise. Android <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobilize/android-moving-next-gen-navigation-device-648">navigators</a>? Why not? PMPs? Creative's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5324542/creative-zii-egg-plaszma-android+wielding-ipod-touch">got one</a>. Photo frames and set-top boxes? <a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20090515/170197/">Already in the works</a>.</p>
<p>Most of these devices won't look like Android hardware to us, because our strongest Android associations with the OS are all visual and phone-specific, like the homescreen, app drawer and dialer. Nonetheless, this is as much a part of the Android vision as phones are&mdash;it just won't be as obvious.</p>
<p>Your Android-powered DVR won't have an app drawer, but it will share the kernel, and an unusually good widget system. Your Android-powered PMP may run a custom interface, but it'll have access to thousands of apps, like an open-source iPod Touch. Your Android-powered photo frame might look just like any other photo frame, but when it drops your wireless connection, it'll have a decent, full-featured settings screen to help you pick it back up. And over-the-air updates. And it might actually cost a few dollars less that it would have otherwise, because remember, Android is <em>free</em>. This is our Android future, and it sounds awesome.</p>
<h2>What Happens Next</h2>
<p>But the first step in the Android takeover is necessarily the phones. Android 2.0 means the handsets aren't just interesting anymore; they're truly buyable. As Matt <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review?skyline=true&s=x">said</a> this week:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In time, Android very well could be the internet phone, hands down, in terms of raw capabilities.... Android 2.0's potential finally feels as enormous as the iPhone's, and I get kinda tingly thinking about it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_s90shots__069.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>What problems the phones still have&mdash;among them, poor media playback and the lack of a bundled desktop client to manage media&mdash;are not with Android but with Google, which is really just a major <em>supporter</em> of Android. Either Google will solve them hands-on, or the dream of the open source and app developer communities rising up to fill in all the gaps will become a reality. What's certain is that Google&mdash;or someone&mdash;needs to address them if future legions of Google-branded phones are to succeed to their full potential.</p>
<p>Speaking of potential, it's massive. In addition to everything else Android has going on, timing is on its side. Windows Mobile is limping along with two broken legs, and its hardware partners took (or maybe gave) notice: Motorola, lately a pariah in its own right, doesn't want <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375635/motorola-passes-on-windows-mobile-65">anything more to do with Microsoft</a>; HTC is stating continued support while quietly <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5320444/windows-mobiles-biggest-booster-htc-going-to-android-for-half-their-phones-next-year">phasing out</a> the WinMo ranks; Sony Ericsson, which hasn't seen a true hit come from one of their Microsoft-branded phones in years, is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xperia-x10">dabbling</a> in Androidery. And as far as most consumers are concerned, anything Windows Mobile can do, Android can do better.</p>
<p>It doesn't stop with Microsoft, either. Symbian, whose boss called Android "<a href="http://gizmodo.com/319431/symbian-boss-calls-android-just-another-linux-platform">just another Linux platform</a>," is losing ground, and losing some of Sony Ericsson's business doesn't help. The Palm Pre, polished and beautiful as it is, can't keep up with Android's exploding app inventory, multiplying hardware partners and rock-star ability to draw talent. RIM's BlackBerry isn't generally seen as a direct Android competitor, but Android 2.0, along with Palm's WebOS and Apple's iPhone OS, are the main reasons the BlackBerry OS feels so clunky and old. That matters. From here, the outlook is clear: Android and the iPhone are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392799/how-palm-lost-like-apple-in-the-80s">the next consumer smartphone superpowers</a>.</p>
<p>And even if it takes Google 10 years to iron out Android's faults and push this kind of adoption, you can expect Android, or its unofficial pseudonym "Google Phone," to become a household name. Besides, Android will start creeping into our lives in places we might not expect it. It'll power our settop boxes, ebook readers, PMPs and who knows what else. It's not just going to be the next great smartphone OS, it'll be the quiet, invisible software layer that sits between all our portable gadgets and our fingers.</p>
<p><em>Source photo courtesy of <a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=885">NASA</a></em></p>
<p><i>Still something you wanna know? Still mixing up your Androids and your hemorrhoids? Send questions, tips, addenda or complaints <a href="mailto:jherrman@gizmodo.com">here</a>, with "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #gizexplains" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gizexplains/">Giz Explains</a>" in the subject line.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397215/giz-explains-android-and-how-it-will-take-over-the-world]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397215]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android 2.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397215&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[LG Chocolate Touch, BlackBerry Curve 8530, and Samsung Convoy: Verizon's Second-String Lineup]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Untitled_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Untitled_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The Motorola Droid and HTC Droid Eris may get all the buzz, but what about Verizon's less glamorous new phones? The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lgchocolatetouch" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lgchocolatetouch/">LG Chocolate Touch</a>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrycurve8530" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrycurve8530/">BlackBerry Curve 8530</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #samsungconvoy" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samsungconvoy/">Samsung Convoy</a> were all introduced today, and they too deserve a look.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/LG_Chocolate_Touch_Front_hr_02.jpg" width="160" height="292"><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5364044/verizon-lg-chocolate-touch-inches-toward-unexciting-arrival-with-leaked-photos">LG Chocolate Touch</a> is the latest iteration of the Chocolate line, and brings with it some new music features: FM radio, dedicated key for favorites, Dolby Mobile sound enhancements, and an unexpected and downright weird "Join the Band" feature. Join the Band features a virtual drum kit and scrolling 88-key keyboard so you can tap along with your music. Of course, it also offers Twitter, Facebook and MySpace integration, a 3.2MP camera and one-touch uploading. It's not a super exciting phone like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5326249/first-lg-chocolate-bl40-official-shots-dont-surprise-still-stun">BL40</a>, but at least it's odd enough to be sort of interesting. It's available today and costs $80 after a $50 mail-in rebate.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/BlackBerry_Curve_8530_FrontNoShadow_03.jpg" width="160" height="249"><br>
On the BlackBerry side of things, we have yet another 'Berry with the Curve moniker (if you're confused about the multitude of identically-named but different-numbered Curves, check out <a href="http://crackberry.com/blackberry-curve-8530-review">this handy chart</a>). The Curve 8530 is the followup to Verizon's Curve 8330, and has features more in line with the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/blackberry-curve-8520-lightning-review-cheap-not-the-good-kind/">GSM Curve 8520</a> than the Curve 8900. If you're still following me, great, because this is one of the best Curves out there: It's got Wi-Fi, 3G <em>and</em> GPS. It's the only Curve with 3G, and improves on <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5323639/blackberry-curve-8520-officially-cheap-and-ball+less">its GSM brother</a> by offering GPS. Other than that, it's the same 85xx Curve that Matt <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/blackberry-curve-8520-lightning-review-cheap-not-the-good-kind/">already reviewed</a>. It'll cost $100 after a $100 mail-in rebate when it's released on November 20th.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Samsung_Convoy__closedfront_03.jpg" width="160" height="294"><br>
And bringing up the rear, we've got the Samsung Convoy, a burly push-to-talk flip-phone that meets military specification, unlike me. It's got a 1300 mAh battery, which is bigger than some smartphones, and is built to withstand shock, dust, vibration, salt fog, humidity, and solar radiation. It'll probably survive until the end of the Iraq War. The Samsung Convoy will be available November 15th for $50 after a $50 mail-in rebate.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5397796,4,'');
</script>[<a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/">Verizon</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397559/lg-chocolate-touch-blackberry-curve-8530-and-samsung-convoy-verizons-second+string-lineup]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397559]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry curve 8530]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chocolate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg chocolate touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung convoy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397559&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AT&T FLO TV Service Drops to $10/month]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you want to watch "CBS Mobile, CNBC, CNN Mobile, COMEDY CENTRAL, ESPN Mobile TV, FOX Mobile, FOX News, MSNBC, MTV, NBC 2Go, Nickelodeon and the movie channel Crackle", that's now $10 on AT&T phones that support <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #flotv" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #flotv" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flotv/">FLO TV</a>. Well, not RIGHT NOW. We mean starting November 8th. </p>
<p>For the record, the service used to cost $15/month. [<a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/learn/messaging-internet/mobile-tv/">AT&T</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397759/att-flo-tv-service-drops-to-10month]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397759]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flo tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:49:33 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397759&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Somali Terrorists Ban Musical Ringtones]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_SomaliRingtones2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Seriously, how messed up is this. Al Shabaab insurgents in Somalia (<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #alqaeda" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/alqaeda/">Al Qaeda</a>'s proxy in the region) are going around flogging teenagers for listening to music and watching videos on their phones. Not to mention the senseless killings and amputations.</p>
<p>Fighting has killed almost 20,000 Somalis since 2007, and though some semblance of order has been restored, the imposed Sharia law has banned even regular moderate muslims from dancing at weddings, or even playing and watching soccer. If you're having a bad day today, take a moment and remember just how good you actually do have it. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE5A24CE20091103?feedType=RSS&feedName=oddlyEnoughNews&rpc=22&sp=true">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397659/somali-terrorists-ban-musical-ringtones]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397659]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ringtones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[somali terrorists ringtones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:13:02 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397659&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[David Pogue: "Smartphone Is Too Limited...It's An App Phone"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/droidpogue.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Before <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #davidpogue" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/davidpogue/">David Pogue</a> wrote his review of the Droid, he had trouble deciding what to call the device. He argued that "smartphone" is an outdated label for the "iPhone-like" devices coming out and so he looked for a new one.</p>
<p>Our Jason Chen <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5061705/smartphone-is-a-dumb-word-we-need-a-new-name">discussed this issue in the past</a> and coined the term "com," but here's Pogue's take:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>What should we call these iPhone-like, touch screen Wi-Fi phones with music and video, real Web browsers, e-mail, sensors (light, tilt, location, proximity), and, above all, app stores? These machines can download thousands of free or cheap add-on programs - "apps" - and become GPS units, musical instruments and medical equipment.</p>
<p>"Smartphone" is too limited. A smartphone is a cellphone with e-mail - an old BlackBerry, a Blackjack, maybe a Treo. This new category - somewhere between cellphones and laptops, or even beyond them - deserves a name of its own.</p>
<p>I invited suggestions on Twitter. The best came from @mentalworkout: "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appphone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appphone/">app phone</a>." Bingo. Apps distinguish iPhonish phones from mere smartphones, so "app phones" it is.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I disagree with both Chen and Pogue and prefer to think of the gadgets as "Things I Can't Live Without," but what do you think they should be called? [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/technology/personaltech/05pogue.html?_r=2">NY Times</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397539/david-pogue-smartphone-is-too-limitedits-an-app-phone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397539]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[david pogue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pogue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397539&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leaked AT&T Memo Outlines Spin Tactics Regarding Verizon Lawsuit]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I'll admit that I got a slight chuckle out of this particular memo sent to AT&T employees today. It explains that the company has in fact <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396332/att-suing-verizon-because-map-ad-is-confusing-to-dumb-people-and-lawyers">filed a lawsuit against Verizon</a> for the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375027/verizon-bitch-slaps-att--in-theres-a-map-for-that-commercial">rather hilarious "There's a Map for That" ad campaign</a> and proceeds to instruct employees to use any inquiries as a chance to talk about AT&T's great qualities:</p>
<blockquote><p>
    <b>Channels:</b> COR, DMDR, LD, and NR Internal<br />
   <b> Roles:</b> Reps & Above<br />
    <b>Markets:</b> All<br />
    <b>Contact:</b> Your Manager</p>
<p>AT&T filed a lawsuit on November 4, 2009 against Verizon's "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theresamapforthat" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theresamapforthat" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theresamapforthat/">There's a Map for That</a>" advertising campaign. Independent research shows that the maps in the advertisements mislead consumers into believing that we do not offer any wireless service in the vast majority of the country. In fact, AT&T's 2.5G EDGE network covers 1.75 million square miles of the United States, reaching some 296 million people, roughly the same number reached by Verizon's network. This network supports popular services like e-mail, surfing the Web, texting, and voice calling, including the activities shown in the Verizon TV advertisements. In addition, our 3G service, the nation's fastest, is available in more than 9,400 cities and towns.</p>
<p>    We filed the lawsuit in Federal District Court in Atlanta and asked that Verizon be prohibited from misleading consumers regarding the scope of our wireless network.</p>
<p>    How should I respond to customers who ask about the lawsuit?</p>
<p>    While we cannot speculate on the complaint filed, it is a great opportunity to remind customers of AT&T's many advantages that over 81 million customers enjoy, including:</p>
<p>        * Best Network<br />
        * The best coverage worldwide (More Bars in More PlacesTM).<br />
        * The nation's fastest 3G network and the only national 3G carrier providing simultaneous voice and data usage.<br />
        * The most devices that work in the most places including Japan and South Korea (3G 2100 MHz device required).<br />
        * The nation's largest wireless and wireline broadband provider.<br />
        * The nation's largest company-owned and operated WiFi network with more than 20,000 hotspots, including Starbucks, McDonald's and Barnes and Noble, as well as access to over 120,000 hotspots around the world.<br />
        * The leading provider of local and long distance voice services.</p>
<p>          Greatest Value – The fairest value with Rollover® allowing customers to keep their unused minutes month to month.<br />
          Best Products - The most innovative exclusive devices such as the iPhoneTM 3GS.<br />
          Most Convenient Services<br />
        * The most customer friendly free self-service tools with *Services for checking usage, paying bills, and adding features.<br />
        * The most convenient and cost-effective way for customers to manage their accounts with Combined Billing for wireless and wireline products.<br />
        * Industry leading 30-day satisfaction guarantee.</p>
<p>    As always, if you have an inquiry from the media, please refer them to your local media relations team member.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I guess that if you've made a mockery of the court system with a ridiculous lawsuit, then you might as well use the attention for a bit of spin. [<a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/11/04/leaked-att-memo-if-anyone-asks-about-the-verizon-lawsuit-just-tell-them-were-awesome/">Mobile Crunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397510/leaked-att-memo-outlines-spin-tactics-regarding-verizon-lawsuit]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397510]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[internal memos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att internal memo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[there's a map for that]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:29:28 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397510&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Bold 9700 Impressions: Small and Chirpy, Like a Black Hummingbird]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__088.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bbold9700__088.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386509/blackberry-bold-9700-on-t+mobile-and-att-in-november">BlackBerry Bold 9700</a> in a word? Compact. It's efficient, almost cramped, like a Japanese car from the 80s.</p>

<p>Succinctly, it's the new BlackBerry to buy if you're on T-Mobile or AT&T. Doubly so on T-Mo, since it's their first 3G BlackBerry.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__099.jpg" width="804" height="536">It's not very much like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5075236/att-blackberry-bold-review-best-blackberry-yet">the original Bold</a> at all, which was the Escalade of BlackBerrys: big, obnoxious, but seriously comfortable to drive because it gave you tons of room to spread your legs (err, thumbs). If you're used to that, at first the 9700&mdash;which is even smaller and lighter than the Tour on Sprint and Verizon&mdash;feels like you've been shoved inside of a clown car because the keyboard and screen, while retaining the same shape and resolution, respectively, have been shrink-rayed. (<strong>Update</strong>: Actually, the resolution's been bumped up 40 pixels, to 480x360, from 480x320.)</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__090.jpg" width="804" height="536">But, then you realize you're not typing any slower, or less precisely. The 9700's keyboard isn't as flat out <em>comfortable</em> as the original Bold&mdash;purely a matter of physics&mdash;but it's a minor marvel of ergonomics that RIM has recession-sized the keyboard this effectively. They're simply brilliant at building keyboards. The screen has the same resolution as the Bold's, but in a smaller size, meaning it has a higher pixel density. Despite that extra clarity, I felt a bit constrained by it, especially browsing the web.</p>
<p>It's the second BlackBerry to ditch all-too-easily-slain-by-lint trackball for an optical trackpad, and the first that's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5331885/blackberry-curve-8520-lightning-review-cheap-not-just-the-good-kind">not built for Walmart</a>. You'll miss the trackball for about 15 seconds. Like I said before, the trackpad's 90 percent as good as the ball. You might miss the physical feedback, and it sometimes doesn't totally accurately interpret a diagonal swipe that you know wouldn't be a problem with the ball but it's good enough, and by far the most accurate and responsive trackpad I've used on a phone.</p>
<p>It's running BlackBerry OS 5.0 which isn't <em>tons</em> different than the OS that shipped on the original Bold or Curve 8900, but it's definitely springier and it has a few brushstrokes of added polish here and there. One place you notice is the browser&mdash;while not as fast as the iPhone 3GS or Android, it has some extra zip to it, and it even sped past the Storm 2 loading pages, despite racing on T-Mobile's 3G network vs. Verizon's.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5397352,12,'');
</script><em>Note: In the gallery, the T-Mobile one is the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bold9700/">Bold 9700</a>, the AT&T phone is the original Bold.</em></p>
<p>Basically, barring any major bugs that pop up over the next couple of days, this is the BlackBerry you probably wanna bug your corporate overlords to handcuff to your pants if you're on AT&T or T-Mobile, since it'll slide into them easier than any BlackBerry yet. I just hope you enjoy the feel of faux leather. [<a href="http://www.blackberry.com/">BlackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397391]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:01:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397391&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Video: Concept Symbian Interface Blends Augmented Reality Maps and Social Networking]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/SymbianConcept.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_SymbianConcept.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The flashy concept was shown at the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #symbianfoundation" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/symbianfoundation/">Symbian Foundation</a>'s SEE 2009 keynote last month, and actually looks pretty cool. But is it too little, too late?</p>
<p>Only LG, Nokia, Samsung and Sony Ericsson make Symbian phones of note&mdash;Motorola <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392197/how-motorola-stopped-sucking">axed</a> its line. Samsung <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5343717/samsung-omnia-hd-i8910-review">puts</a> its TouchWiz UI on top of the dreadful S60 OS, and Sony Ericsson will likely do the same with its <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395865/watch-the-xperia-x10s-rachael-interface-in-action">Rachael interface</a>. Android is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/android">taking off</a>, and even Nokia is looking to its Linux-based <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377966/nokias-next-os-maemo-6-could-look-like-this">Maemo OS</a> for its best stuff, like the N900. The Symbian OS still has a big slice of the phone market, but for how long?</p>
<p>And the cool UI in this video: The Symbian Foundation says that it's not part of the Symbian UI roadmap, but they hope some of its features and effects make it into their reference UI and/or delivered handsets. Will you still care? [<a href="http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/news/item/10656_Communication_conversation_and.php">All About Symbian</a> via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/symbian-foundation-concept-ui-blends-augmented-reality-social-networks-video-0462696/">SlashGear</a>]</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-yQv18fS660&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-yQv18fS660&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396860/video-concept-symbian-interface-blends-augmented-reality-maps-and-social-networking]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396860]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[s60]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Symbian Concept Interface]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian foundation]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:12:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396860&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[It's Official: HTC HD2 Coming to "Major US Carrier in Early 2010"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/htc-hd2-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_htc-hd2-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>With a 4.3-inch capacitive touchscreen and 1GHz Snapdragon processor, the HD2 is probably the best poster child for WinMo 6.5. HTC has now confirmed it's headed State-side, and though no carrier was mentioned, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381327/rumor-htc-hd2-arriving-on-t+mobile-in-the-us">rumors</a> suggest it could be on T-Mobile.</p>
<p>The HD2 arrives on T-Mobile in Europe on November 9, and Asia is also getting it this week. So question: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #htchd2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htchd2/">HTC HD2</a>, Sony Ericsson <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395865/watch-the-xperia-x10s-rachael-interface-in-action">XPERIA X10</a> (1GHz Snapdragon, 4-inch display, and Rachael UI on top of Android), or the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">Motorola Droid</a> (3.7-inch display and Android)…which gets your vote? Or has something else caught your eye? [<a href="http://www.htc.com/www/press.aspx?id=115674&lang=1033">HTC</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396787/its-official-htc-hd2-coming-to-major-us-carrier-in-early-2010]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396787]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc hd2]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:18:05 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396787&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AT&T Suing Verizon Because "Map" Ad Is Confusing to Dumb People (and Lawyers)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/VZ_vs_ATT_3G_coverage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_VZ_vs_ATT_3G_coverage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375027/verizon-bitch-slaps-att--in-theres-a-map-for-that-commercial">Verizon Wireless ad</a> shows a beefy Verizon 3G map next to a less impressive AT&T 3G map. AT&T is suing, saying it leads people to believe AT&T has no phone service outside of its (admittedly skimpier) 3G areas.</p>
<p>Now, the "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theresamapforthat" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theresamapforthat/">There's a Map for That</a>" ad focuses on 3G alone, and the discussion is about 3G services, including video. But the charge AT&T makes is that people who watch the ad are being deliberately led to thinking that in the white spaces, there's no AT&T phone service at all. Here's the accusation:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Consumers are interpreting the white or blank space on the maps to mean that AT&T customers who are not in an AT&T "3G" coverage area have no wireless coverage whatsoever, and therefore have no ability to use their wireless devices for any purposes in vast areas of the country. This interpretation is not surprising as Verizon, in its own coverage maps, uses white space to inform customers that no coverage of any kind exists.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The thing is, this is somewhat tricky to prove, but it sounds wrong. There are areas of Verizon voice coverage that are not marked as red in the map in the commercial, if my squint-eye human-instrument comparison test is accurate. Try it for yourself. Does the map up top better resemble the one in blue and yellow (but not green), which shows broadband, aka 3G? Or the one in red, which shows voice and messaging?</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Verizon_3G_map.jpg" width="741" height="301"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Verizon_Voice_coverage_map.jpg" width="742" height="295"></p>
<p>For reference, here's AT&T's map&mdash;note, only the very darkest shade of blue represents 3G coverage:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/AT_T_coverage_map.jpg" width="657" height="356"></p>
<p>The ad may contain jargon that might confuse middle America&mdash;I will admit that&mdash;but to any trained ear, it's pretty clearly about 3G. As far as this maps claim, though, that seems dubious. The maps that Verizon chose do seem to represent the same thing&mdash;3G coverage only. Yes, AT&T lawyers, if I'm right about this, it means that had Verizon cheated, their map would have been <em>even redder</em> than the one in the ad. So what's say we spend more of that iPhone subscription money on fixing the network (near my house, please!) and less money on frivolous lawsuits.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YCbYTrYD5y8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YCbYTrYD5y8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>[<a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/memorandum_of_law-att-vzw.pdf">AT&T's Motion for the Restraining Order of Verizon WARNING: PDF]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396332/att-suing-verizon-because-map-ad-is-confusing-to-dumb-people-and-lawyers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396332]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[there's a map for that]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:46:44 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396332&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Droid Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s90shots__069.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s90shots__069.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's this simple: If you don't buy an iPhone, buy a Droid.</p>
<p>It's the best phone on Verizon, and with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android20" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android20/">Android 2.0</a>, the second best smartphone you can buy, period. It's flawed, deeply in some ways. But it's the second best phone around, on the best network around.</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391825/motorola-droid-first-hands-on-its-a-terminator">Droid is a champion</a> of possibilities: for Motorola, for Verizon, for Android 2.0. It exists to show you what each of them can really do. You can kind of think of it like a Super G1, laying out what it means to be an Android 2.0 phone, with powerful new processors and delicious new displays with sky-high resolutions. If Droid is merely the first in a new wave, we have a lot to be excited about.</p>
<h1>The Shiny New OS</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/hooooome.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_hooooome.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The main attraction for Droid is Android 2.0, the remarkably updated mobile OS from Google. It's so important, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395801/android-20-review-almost-human">it gets its own review</a>. After all, you will start to see it on other phones soon. It's what makes Droid so great&mdash;new navigation app, new contacts/social network syncing, better email management, better browser&mdash;but also why Droid still falls short of the iPhone, particularly when it comes to managing music and video. If there's something you don't see here, chances are we discussed it in the earlier piece&mdash;if you care about the phone, you're gonna want to read <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395801/android-20-review-almost-human">the full software review</a> too.</p>
<h1>Design and Build</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s90shots__062.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s90shots__062.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It didn't hit me until last weekend why Droid's design struck such an emotional chord with me. Was it the functionalist, industrial masculinity, expressed perfectly through glass and metal and unapologetic angles, in a powerful phone that's remarkably streamlined? It's all of that, yes. But it's also the fact that aesthetic is rendered black and gold metal accents, which is why it taps into something deep and profoundly affective from my childhood:<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/batmandroid.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_batmandroid.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br clear="all">
It's practically cheating. I can't not love the design of this phone.</p>
<h1>Oh, That Screen</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/drooooooid__019.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_drooooooid__019.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Droid's 3.7-inch, 854x480 display with an eye-popping pixel density of 267ppi, is the kind of screen you ache for. An analogy: Do you remember how amazing you thought Nintendo 64 games looked, ten years ago? Have you looked at them lately? Do you remember the sinking feeling you got, realizing just how ugly they are now? That's how'll you'll feel looking at every other phone with the now-standard 480x320 screens we thought were so gorgeous a couple of years ago. They're lo-fi and lifeless by comparison.</p>
<p>It's the clarity of the text that captivates. It's true, there've been Windows phones with excellent screens that have the same resolution as Droid, but the font rendering has always been too weak to take advantage of them. Reading ebooks on an iPhone has always given me a headache (so I don't), but with Droid's pixel density, I could read on it for hours. It's that good. The color's fantastic, too, though not Zune HD OLED level.</p>
<p>Touch response is mostly effective. When there are misfires, like getting no response when you flick your finger to pull out the app menu, it's hard to tell if it's the phone or the software&mdash;at least until more Android 2.0 phones are out there. But no serious complaints.</p>
<h1>Keyboard and Strange Buttons</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s90shots__070.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s90shots__070.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The keyboard is <em>okay</em>. I liked it a lot more on Day 1 than I do today, and that's because I never got any faster. The problem is that the key landscape is too flat and homogenous&mdash;a necessary sacrifice for Droid's remarkable skinniness&mdash;so there's simply no way to feel out precisely what key your thumb's on, meaning I never broke out of having to stare at the keyboard while typing. I found the actual layout to be excellent. Overall, the keyboard works, but you'll probably never fly on it. I'm faster on the landscape touch keyboard, personally.</p>
<p>The d-pad's not as dandy as a trackball for getting around, but for navigating around text, it's better than I expected&mdash;despite its puniness, I never pressed the wrong button.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/drooooooid__007.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_drooooooid__007.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>But I hate the four soft touch buttons on the front of the phone. For one, there are no dedicated phone or end call buttons, so if you accidentally call somebody at 4am, you have to figure out how to end the call exclusively via the software interface. For two, the lack of feedback is annoying, especially if you're holding down the search button trying to activate voice search and it's not coming up. Did you miss the button? Are you pressing it wrong? Who knows? If Android's going to rely hard on these four buttons, the way iPhone relies on the home button, they need to be actual physical objects.</p>
<h1>This Camera Sucks</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/droidsample.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_droidsample.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The camera is complete garbage. It takes 10 years to start up, 2 to focus, and another 4 to actually take the goddamn picture. And there's no distinct visual feedback to let you know a photo's been snapped. And the photos suck. That pumpkin shot, in decent lighting, is as good as it gets. Like I said in the Android 2.0 review, I don't know if it's the hardware or the software, but it's inexcusably bad. (<strong>Update</strong>: Here's a couple of more shots from the camera. You can compare the indoors one with the much better Sprint Hero sample shot <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361245/sprint-hero-review-faster-stronger-uglier">seen here</a>, since they were taken in the same place.)<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5396508,2,'');
</script><br>
Video's not terrible, though, beyond the fussy format even VLC doesn't even like playing:<br>
<object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7418856&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7418856&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7418856.jpg"></a></p>
<h1>Performance</h1>
<p>Droid's brain is a potent <a href="http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?templateId=6123&navigationId=12643&contentId=14649">ARM Cortex A8 TI OMAP 3430</a>&mdash;it's basically the same as the chips inside of the Palm Pre and iPhone 3GS. Like I said in the Android 2.0 review, while it runs apps and multitasks with gusto, basic things like menus and the desktop stutter way too often. It's like driving a Ferrari with a door that groans loudly every time you open it.</p>
<h1>Battery Life</h1>
<p>With moderate to heavy usage&mdash;browsing, some navigation, push Gmail, moderate app usage, with the occasional app running in the background&mdash;I managed to make it through a full 8-12 hour day before recharging, each day for about a week, though some days were closer than others. Your mileage will vary, depending on how many apps you've got running in the background and how much you hit GPS, but my experience was that it was entirely acceptable for a modern smartphone.</p>
<h1>Nuts, Bolts and Stability</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s90shots__066.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s90shots__066.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Verizon's network is top notch, and being able to actually use the internet on my phone with impunity in New York is revelatory. In both New York and Seattle testing, reception has been excellent, though around Pittsburgh, it was spottier than expected. Voice quality was pretty excellent whenever we didn't use Google Voice.</p>
<p>While definitely stable enough to use as an everyday phone, we did run into a few bugs: GPS accuracy was wildly off-target on more than one occasion, pinpointing our location hundreds of miles away, and the only way to fix it was to reboot the phone (I assume that's a software issue, not a hardware one). We also had one complete crash after finishing a phone call that required a reboot. And more apps stopped responding more often than we were used to on previous versions of Android, requiring a force close.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5396201,12, 'Motorola Droid');
</script><br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5391960,12,'Original Droid Gallery');
</script></p>
<h1>Hello, Moto</h1>
<p>These things are true about Droid: The camera's not great; the keyboard isn't mindblowing; Android 2.0 lacks the polish and multimedia prowess to completely match the iPhone. What's also true is that a killer design, Google's services, Android's exploding app ecosytem, powerful multitasking, a stunning screen and Verizon's network still make it the second best phone you can buy right now, after the iPhone.</p>
<p>At the same time, there's reason to pause. Android is evolving more rapidly than any other smartphone platform, both in terms of the hardware and software. When HTC's Hero came out, it crushed every other Android phone out there. Just a couple short months later, Droid is on top. In four months, we'll probably see a new champion. That Droid sets such a high bar for everything after might be the best thing about it.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplusplus.jpg" width="40" height="20"> Display, display, display<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Um, just look at it<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">A smartphone you actually want on Verizon!<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Keyboard is merely adequate, at best<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Camera is utter garbage<br>
<br clear="all"></p>
<p>[<a href="http://phones.verizonwireless.com/motorola/droid/">Droid</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396168]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android 2.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396168&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders: Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Case-Mate Designs Kindle Case, Proves They Don't Understand Kindle...Famous Watchmaker Teams With Famous Carmaker To Launch Least Famous Phone Ever...Designer Discovers Way To Make Bike Seats More Uncomfortable...<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windturbines" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windturbines/">Wind Turbines</a> Go Stealth to Quit Screwing Up Radar</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Case-Mate_Enlighten_Kindle.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
Case-Mate, the people who used to make zipper booklets for CDs, built the $80 Enlighten case that lights up the Kindle at night by way of an LED-illuminated acrylic overlay. So basically they pulled a Sony: Taking what's right about e-ink, and screwing it up. You don't put anything on e-ink, for the same reason you don't read paper through a film of plastic. We typically don't write up cases, but despite its unique gimmick (okay, because of it) this one looks exceptionally pass-worthy. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10388629-1.html">CNet</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Tag_Heuer_Merediist_Lamborghini.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
It's bad enough when pompous over-the-hill watchmakers think they can get into the cellphone business, like <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #tagheuer" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tagheuer/">Tag Heuer</a> did when it introduced the luxury-for-luxury's-sake $6000 <a href="http://gizmodo.com/377321/6100-croc+skinned-tag-heuer-meridiist-phone-nothing-but-a-pretty-face">Merediist</a>. It's worse when they team up with an extreme car company to release a still more ridiculously irrelevant phone, like Tag Heuer did when it called up its friend Lamborghini and cooked up the, yep, special edition Merediist Automobili Lamborghini. For $8000, you get the same crappy phone as before, but with the signature angry cow shield on the keypad, and a plaque in place of the crocodile skin. Yes they'll sell a handful to bald Italian billionaires over 60, but how many of those can there be? [<a href="http://meridiist.tagheuer.com/EUR/index_main.php?cc=EUR&menu_target=">Tag Heuer</a> via <a href="http://www.gadgetell.com/tech/comment/tag-heuer-releases-luxury-lamborghini-mobile-phone/">Gadgetell</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/jruiter_urban_bike.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
I love when the age-old bicycle gets a redesign, and points go to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #joeyruiter" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/joeyruiter/">Joey Ruiter</a> for thinking through the needs of the urban bicyclist, trading speed for agility, and stripping the bike to its simplest parts. But I never thought bike seats could look any more uncomfortable than the borderline rectal probes out there now, until lo, I spotted this rectangular sucka. Joey, you're clearly talented, but I gotta ask, how can that seat be copacetic to the culo? [<a href="http://www.core77.com/blog/object_culture/jruiter_studios_super-minimal_city_bike_15092.asp">Core77</a> via <a href="http://theawesomer.com/concept-inner-city-bike/21509/">The Awesomer</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Qinetiq_stealth_wind_turbine.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
As much as I want alternative energy ASAP, I am worried about wind farms. First, they're <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/wellington/2765353/Turbine-plan-raises-fears-for-sanctuary-flock">killing off flocks of birds</a> or at least <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-fry2-2009nov02,0,1954510.story">scaring them the hell away</a>, and now they're making air traffic control jumpy too. Because of their flailing metal blades, radar waves get super screwy around them, and sometimes cause airplanes to <em>disappear</em> from radar. (Cue gulp of fear.) For this problem, a firm called Qinetiq built a seemingly decent solution, layering blades with sheets of radar-slurping glass-reinforced epoxy and plastic foam. It's nice, especially because you can pretty much replace the blade and leave everything else as is. But it's just coming out of the <a href="http://www.qinetiq.com/home/newsroom/news_releases_homepage/2009/4th_quarter/stealth_turbine_trial.html">trial phase</a>, and will take some time before it's ready for turbines that are now in place or being built. While we wait, let's talk about them birds... [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/23837/?a=f">MIT Tech Review</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/stealth-wind-turbines-avoid-cluttering-aviation-radar-and-erasing-aircraft-signatures">PopSci</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395697/remainders-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395697]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[automobili]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bicycle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bike]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[case-mate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[inner city bike]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[joey ruiter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jruiter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lamborghini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[merediist]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qinetiq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stealth wind turbine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tag heuer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vestas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watches]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wind turbines]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395697&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone Ebooks: The New Fart Apps]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/apps.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_apps.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/01/iphone-e-book-reader/">buzzy</a> new <a href="http://blog.flurry.com/bid/27796/Flurry-Smartphone-Industry-Pulse-October-2009">report</a> says that iPhone ebook apps are on the rise, and accounted for more new apps in October&mdash;nearly a <em>fifth</em>&mdash;than even games. It's unexpected and exciting, but what does it mean? Spam, is what.</p>

<p>The data shows a clear rise in ebook apps over the last few months, such that they account for a staggering number of the new apps showing up in the store. It's true! Look at the chart! But here's the thing: this is purely a measure of <em>how many</em> new apps there are, not how well they're doing. But still, why such a huge uptick? Let's do a little experiment.</p>
<p>Pick your favorite public domain book. No, scratch that, pick your <em>least</em> favorite public domain book&mdash;something you had to read back in freshman year of college, and that you immediately and angrily sold back to the campus bookstore. Now, search for it in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appstore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appstore/">App Store</a>. Here's our answer:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/by_default_2009-11-02_at_2.28.14_PM.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_by_default_2009-11-02_at_2.28.14_PM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<em>Treasure Island</em>, a free, public domain book, is available for purchase as a standalone app from over a <em>dozen</em> different developers, in all kinds of containers, at all kinds of prices. And why not! the content is free, so once developer has designed an ebook app container, he can just paste any public domain etext in there and throw it into the App Store. I have no idea if these things sell, but to be honest, they wouldn't have to do very well to make money for their developers&mdash;the investment is minimal.</p>
<p>Even more to the point, if the iPhone really starts to pose a threat to tradition ereaders, it won't be evident in stats like this&mdash;it'll be through increased book downloads in all-in-one ereader apps, like Amazon's Kindle, B&N's Reader and unaffiliated apps like eReader and Stanza. That's a real possibility, but for now, we should call this rapid explosion of redundant, overpriced, exploitative apps like we see it. [<a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/01/iphone-e-book-reader/">GigaOm</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395396/iphone-ebooks-the-new-fart-apps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395396]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone ebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:30:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395396&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Atheros Wireless N for Smartphones Actually Uses Less Power Than Slowass G]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/thumb160x_atherosthumb.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #wirelessn" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wirelessn/">Wireless N</a> in cellphones, it's happening next year: Atheros's AR6003 802.11n/Bluetooth chip for cellphones is tiny, has serious range and uses less power than their current wireless G chip, which is in the Zune HD. It'll hit phones around the second half of next year. Such a long wait. [<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2355076,00.asp?kc=PCRSS03069TX1K0001121">PC Mag</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395173/atheros-wireless-n-for-smartphones-actually-uses-less-power-than-slowass-g]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395173]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[802.11n]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atheros]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless n]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:36:46 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395173&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RIM Is Definitely Developing a WebKit (Read: Decent) Browser]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_blackberryb.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />It wasn't a huge leap to take RIM's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5344237/rim-gobbles-up-torch-mobile-translation-blackberrys-getting-webkit-thank-god">purchase of Torch Mobile</a>, a software company known exclusively for making a WebKit mobile browser, as a sign that the company was considering taking the dive. Today, though, we can be sure.</p>
<p>BlackBerry just put out a call for WebKit developers, for a very specific reason:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Utilizing their knowledge in C++ programming, the successful candidate will be working in a fast-paced, dynamic development environment to develop a WebKit-based browser for the BlackBerry Platform.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ok! The only question now is, when? Normally the initial hiring of a core developer could be taken to mean that the project is embryonic, and the final product still months away, but keep in mind: In Torch Mobile's Iris, RIM bought an entire, <em>complete</em> browser. In other words, this may just be an optimization project, not a full-on browser development, so decent browsing on BlackBerry could be closer than we thought. [<a href="http://www.careerbeacon.com/search/en/-1/-1/14/-1/0/0/0/0/0/0/3/MB0910303813">CareerBeacon</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/01/rim-posts-job-listing-for-webkit-developer-gets-one-step-clos/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395158/rim-is-definitely-developing-a-webkit-read-decent-browser]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395158]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry webkit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mobile Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webkit]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:18:33 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395158&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Only 3 Percent of Americans Think It Should Be Legal to Text and Drive]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/homer.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />I didn't think 97 percent of Americans were in agreement about <em>anything</em>, but apparently they are about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #textingwhiledriving" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/textingwhiledriving/">texting while driving</a>: They think it <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/technology/02textingside.html?_r=1&ref=technology">should be illegal</a>. A mere <em>3 percent</em> don't care, or didn't answer cause they were busy texting.</p>
<p>And half think it should have the same penalty as drunk driving. Steeeep.</p>
<p>What's fascinating is that while 80 percent think phones should be a no-no, they deem it kosher if you're going hands-free. Newsflash, morons, a bunch of studies show it's <em>just as distracting</em> if you're <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/154696/cell_phones_distract_drivers_more_than_passengers_do.html">using a Bluetooth headset</a>. It's the conversation that's distracting, not your hands being up near your head. Personally, I think we should also ban eating, drinking, using combs or makeup, overly talkative passengers, any kind of music, talk radio, GPS navigators, and small children from being in cars, period. Only then can we drive completely safely, since then we won't ever be distracted by anything ever again. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/technology/02textingside.html?_r=1&ref=technology">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395070/only-3-percent-of-americans-think-it-should-be-legal-to-text-and-drive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395070]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mandates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[texting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[texting while driving]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:47:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395070&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[GSM Motorola Droid (aka Milestone) Gets Multi-Touch Support!?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_MotorolaMilestone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Talk about unfair: this video appears to show that the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5394549/droid-in-deutschland-you-shall-be-called-milestone">GSM version</a> of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/Droid">Motorola Droid</a> will support multi-touch gestures like pinch-zoom. The U.S version doesn't do multi-touch, even though <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392059/a-visual-guide-to-android-20-so-much-nicer">Android 2.0</a> supports it, so what gives?</p>
<p>Maybe it goes back to the whole multi-touch patent issue with Apple, I don't know. If it turns out the Milestone does indeed have multi-touch when it arrives on November 9, hopefully some sort of patch hack will make its way State-side. [<a href="http://translate.google.com.au/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fmobile-review.com%2Ffullnews%2Fmain%2Findex.shtml%3F26991%2326991&sl=ru&tl=en&history_state0=">Mobile-Review</a> (translated) via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/motorola-milestone-aka-gsm-droid-adds-multitouch-video-0262450/">SlashGear</a>]</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xRiGZ_0Fblk&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22&start=175">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xRiGZ_0Fblk&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22&start=175" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5394993/gsm-motorola-droid-aka-milestone-gets-multi+touch-support]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5394993]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[GSM Motorola Droid Milestone Multi-touch multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[milestone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola milestone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:19:56 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5394993&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Droid, In Deutschland You Shall Be Called Milestone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/o2_germany_motorola_milestone-540x384.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_o2_germany_motorola_milestone-540x384.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Same Droid, different country. Hell, different continent. In Germany thy name be <em>Milestone</em>.</p>

<p>The new name is not as tech-heavy of geektastic as Droid, but we can see the point. From here on out, things are going to be different (hopes Verizon/Motorola).</p>
<p>The image comes from the O2 web site, where the Droid is masquerading about as the Milestone for a presumably contract-free price of about $595. Launch day is November 9, a mere three days after we Yanks get the coveted handset here in the States. No word on whether or not O2 scored an exclusive here or what, as there's no mention of the phone popping up on other carriers' web sites. [<a href="http://www.slashgear.com/motorola-milestone-aka-gsm-verizon-droid-confirmed-for-o2-germany-0162421/">Slashgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5394549/droid-in-deutschland-you-shall-be-called-milestone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5394549]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[handsets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[o2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5394549&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bang Bang, Nokia n-Gage: You're Dead]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/N-GAGE-QD-unit.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Bang, bang, n-Gage: you're dead. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/rip-ngage-139416.php">Again.</a> Maybe for the last time. Here's a short look at your meaningless life.</p>
<p>You were born but a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/005328/nokias-gamephone">hyped, sidetalking Taco</a>. Then, after we had our laughs for several years, papa Nokia ditched your dedicated hardware and opened it up to phones of all kinds&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/375823/nokias-n+gage-cellphone-gaming-platform-is-up-and-running">as long as they said N-O-K-I-A on them</a>. It was a smart move. Because you sell lots of phones, and if your gaming platform was to live, it needed to be on as many of those as possible. It looked ok at this point, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/355376/nokia-n+gage-video-hands+on">as a platform and service</a>. And the hardware <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5100707/nokia-n97-hands-on-the-first-high+end-n+series-touch-phone">was nice at times</a>. But that didn't change the fact that no one I know ever talked about you, n-Gage, much less played with you. The button layouts, games and online vs modes never really came together as well as you'd liked in terms of people buying and using it. Why? I don't know. I guess, at least in America, we couldn't get the handsets for less than the price of 5 Nintendo DSes. But beyond that, you never had <a href="http://gizmodo.com/386893/n+gage-flagship-game-full-of-videogame-character-knockoffs">any games that people cared about</a>, despite having signed up companies like EA so easily because papa Nokia was still number one. And every year at E3, your booth was like a buzz-vacuum. So, I can't say we'll miss you. We hardly knew you were there. But let's just chalk this up to more high end consumer failure to excite at Nokia, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5382438/told-ya-nokia-was-doomed">which has been a trend of late</a>.</p>
<p>I'm done. Honestly, this much word count on nGage is charity, even as a farewell. See ya. Hope we never have to see you again. But the word is, you'll probably just fold some games of yours into a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologySector/idUSLU49246120091030">general app store</a>. The dead never stay dead for long in the gadget game.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5393789/bang-bang-nokia-n+gage-youre-dead]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5393789]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[n-gage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[n-gage dead]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[obituary]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:18:23 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5393789&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows XP Phone: A First Look at its Touchscreen Interface]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Xpphone-Interface0.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Remember the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361497/itg-xpphone-runs-windows-xp-pre+orders-for-att-vodafone-and-orange">xpPhone</a>? The 4.8-inch touchscreen slider has netbook-like specs, some sort of "AMD Super Mobile CPU", and runs a full-blown copy of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsxp" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsxp/">Windows XP</a>. They've just sent through shots of its phone-function interface…and they actually look pretty good.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5393587,12,'xpPhone Gallery');
</script></p>
<p>The main phone screen (pictured below) has call-centric icons, plus shortcuts to regular Windows apps that can be categorized into icon-based tabs on the left.</p>
<p>The interface can also switch between landscape and portrait views, and there's a unified look to it all. I'd like to see some extra flair, though...like photos of contacts for incoming and outgoing calls. It's such an obvious thing, so hopefully that'll show up by the time the phone arrives. The xpPhone's maker&mdash;China's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #intechnologygroup" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/intechnologygroup/">In Technology Group</a> aka ITG&mdash;also says it will support direct access to the Outlook address book for contact management.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Xpphone-Interface00.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>Their English pre-order page remains more like an expression of interest form, as it still doesn't list price. If you curious, you can choose a 3G module for your carrier's necessary frequency (AT&T, Vodafone, and Orange are listed).</p>
<p>Jokes about getting a blue screen of death mid-call aside, I'm getting more and more intrigued about the xpPhone. I mean, the thing weighs almost a pound, but just look at those specs below compared to say, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/N900/">Nokia N900</a>. I'll fill you in when I hear more on pricing/availability&mdash;or any plans for an actual U.S (non-import) release. [<a href="http://www.xpphone.com/en/product/">ITG</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Configuration</strong><br>
• CPU: AMD Super Mobile CPU<br>
• Memory: 512M/1G<br>
• SSD: 8G/16G/32G/64G<br>
• HDD: 30G/60G/80G/120G<br>
• LCD: 4.8' TFT Touch-screen LCD 800*480<br>
• Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP<br>
• Network: GSM/GPRS/EDGE/WCDMA (HSDPA/HSUPA)<br>
• CDMA/CDMA2000 1X/CDMA1X EVDO,TD-SCDMA，TD-HSDPA<br>
• Wireless: WiFi 802.11b/g,WiMax(optional),Buletooth,Stand-alone GPS<br>
• Camera Specifications:CMOS, 300k/1.3 Million<br>
• Ports: 1 x earphone jack, 1 x microphone jack,Docking Connector (includes VGA output signal ), 1 x USB 2.0, SIM Slot<br>
• Battery: Removable Lithium-ion<br>
• Talk time: about 5 hours,Stand by time: about 5 days<br>
• Real life: about 7 hours(Standard), about 12 hours(Large)<br>
• Talk time: Standby time，Operation time may vary depending different usage.<br>
• Weight: 400g (include battery)</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5393584/windows-xp-phone-a-first-look-at-its-touchscreen-interface]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5393584]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cell phones']]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[In Technology Group]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itg xpphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones china]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xpphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xpPhone Windows XP]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5393584&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Storm 2 Review: Improving, But Still Mostly Cloudy]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/storm__056.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_storm__056.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Take <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5093715/blackberry-storm-review-verdict-not-quite-a-perfect-storm">the BlackBerry Storm</a>. Now imagine a phone that's basically exactly the same, but does everything better. That's the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #storm2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/storm2/">Storm 2</a>.</p>

<p>It's the same phone, essentially, just refined in nearly every way. It's not the Storm reinvented, it doesn't shoot lasers, and it's not going to kill anything. It's just better than before.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/storm__059.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_storm__059.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Sure, Press Me Anywhere</h1>
<p>SurePress, RIM's "the whole screen's a button!" touchscreen technology, lives on. But now it's four buttons. Four <em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5343612/blackberry-storm-2-explainer-features-piezo-electronics-wifi">piezo-electric buttons</a></em> that live under the screen, to be precise. What that means for you is that wherever you press on the screen, it feels way more localized, like the screen's only being pushed in exactly where you click it. Before, it was like the whole screen was on a see-saw.</p>
<p>The re-balancing of the screen lets you go far more smoothly and efficiently from one letter to another while typing, rather than waiting for it to pop back up every time. A software change&mdash;which is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389114/blackberry-storm-os-50-update-coming-tomorrow">available for the first Storm too</a>&mdash;enables true multitouch typing (for two fingers, but that's enough). You can actually take advantage of the new screen and type much faster than you could on the original Storm. In other words, the mechanics of SurePress actually work now.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/storm__064.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_storm__064.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The entire build of the mechanism is less janky too&mdash;the giant chasms between the screen and the rest of the phone begging for turkey jerky bits to get sucked like a gaping maw have been closed, and the four main buttons are now a seamless part of pushscreen. Oh, and one clever touch is that the screen's dead stiff whenever the phone's off&mdash;if it doesn't press down, you can tell the phone's off (though it does mean one less thing to fiddle with).</p>
<p>SurePress, while vastly more usable and comfortable now, is still flawed as a touchscreen navigational concept: It's predicated on literally putting an obstacle in front of you that has to be smashed in every time you want to do something. It's not an optimal experience. And it ultimately fails in what it supposedly sets out to do by "separating navigation from confirmation," to use RIM's verbiage: To make you type more accurately. It just makes you type slower and wonder why you can't use the Storm's quite dandy touchscreen like any other touchscreen, since the keyboard and screen are otherwise great.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/storm__068.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_storm__068.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Speed Isn't Everything</h1>
<p>The Storm 2 is quicker all around. The response of nearly every element is just so much springier than the first Storm&mdash;I'm talking versus the launch software to be clear, since frankly, that was the last time I used the Storm. Apps pop up instantly most of the time, hang-ups are a rare occasion, the accelerometer kicks in quickly to rotate the keyboard, and it moves with the kind of speed you expect it to. The phone feels way more like it should. This extends in some respects to the browser, too, which seems a little more capable&mdash;though by no means as stacked as a WebKit browser. I wish the camera was faster to start up though; it's still sluggish most of the time.</p>
<p>There are a few slight visual tweaks to the OS since last year as well that make it more look more polished (I'm very surprised I noticed). For instance there's a more matte, almost Apple-like gradient for highlighted items, like in Messages. Icons are a little more sober, which reflects the darker, slightly more understated look of the phone itself. My favorite software tweak is probably the true QWERTY keyboard in portrait mode, instead RIM's SureType system that previously foisted in front of your thumbs. It's better than Android's&mdash;and HTC's reskin of Android's on the Hero&mdash;though not quite as good as the iPhone's.</p>
<p>While it's got a speed boost and a bit of extra iconographic spitshine, it is still fundamentally the same experience&mdash;the Storm 2 touchscreen interface still feels like it was designed by people with physical keyboards soldered into their brains. From the grand scheme of the UI, the standard BlackBerry setup re-jiggered for touch rather than a ground-up design, to the BlackBerry apps that clearly aren't designed with Storm in mind, there's a definite sense of non-belonging with the Storm 2, like when all of the puzzle pieces don't quite fit together and you jam them together to make it work anyway. In other words, it tries real hard to be a touch phone and a BlackBerry, but it doesn't do either of them exceptionally well.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5393131,12,'');
</script></p>
<p>The Storm 2 is where the Storm should've started, but at the same time, it's coming into a different world than a year ago&mdash;even on its own carrier&mdash;where not breaking new ground is simply moving too slow. More than that, while the Storm is overall a good phone, unless you have a very specific set of criteria for your phone&mdash;that is, a touchscreen BlackBerry&mdash;you probably shouldn't settle for a phone that doesn't do the touch or BlackBerry aspects (read: typing) spectacularly. There are phones that do each of those things better. If you want a BlackBerry on Verizon, get a BlackBerry Tour, which has an awesome keyboard, if a few trackball problems. If you want a touchscreen smartphone on Verizon, you should get a Droid. At least, that's how it's looking so far&mdash;come back early next week for our full in-depth Droid review.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus3_06.jpg" width="20" height="20">SurePress actually works now<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus3_06.jpg" width="20" height="20">Wi-Fi!<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/giznormal_13.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's pretty quick, most of the time<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_13.jpg" width="20" height="20">SurePress is still a mediocre concept, at best<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_13.jpg" width="20" height="20">Still doesn't fit in as a BlackBerry<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_13.jpg" width="20" height="20">There are phones that do what it's good at much better</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5393132/blackberry-storm-2-review-improving-but-still-mostly-cloudy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5393132]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5393132&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Droid Fancy Dock and Car Mount Are Each $30]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In case you're wondering how much the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391825/motorola-droid-first-hands-on-its-a-terminator">Droid's schmancy dock and car mount</a> cost, they're $30 a piece. [<a href="http://www.gearlog.com/2009/10/motorola_droid_car_kit_bedside.php">Gearlog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5392760/droid-fancy-dock-and-car-mount-are-each-30]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5392760]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:19:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5392760&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sprint's Still Bleeding, But Not As Badly]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It's been crazy watching Sprint overhaul itself over the last year, going from a wasteland of phones to probably the number two carrier for hardware, so I feel kinda bad that they still bled out over 800,000 postpaid customers this past quarter. (Postpaid are the customers carriers actually want, vs. people who prepay for chunks of minutes.) </p>
<p>It's an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5079583/sprint-loses-another-13-million-customers-326-million-will-to-live">improvement</a> over the last six months&mdash;the biggest sequential improvement in five years&mdash;and less terrible than expected, but still not good. Sprint thinks it'll be better next quarter, but that $478 million loss gots to sting. [<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2354936,00.asp?kc=PCRSS03069TX1K0001121">PC Mag</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5392682/sprints-still-bleeding-but-not-as-badly]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5392682]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:54:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5392682&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Droid Eris Doesn't Look Too Shabby for a Cheapo Android Phone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/droideris.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_droideris.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A better look at the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392138/htc-droid-eris-might-be-the-cheapest-android-phone-at-99">purportedly $99</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #droideris" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/droideris/">Droid Eris</a>. Not bad, but why is everybody going to stupid touch-sensitive buttons? [<a href="http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/New-images-of-the-HTC-Droid-Eris-article-a_7660.html">Phone Arena</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5392611/droid-eris-doesnt-look-too-shabby-for-a-cheapo-android-phone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5392611]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[droid eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc droid eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:35:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5392611&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[No Android Version of HTC HD2 After All?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_HTCMysteryVerizon.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Hopes may be dashed on that rumored <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5390002/is-this-verizons-android-20-version-of-the-htc-hd2">Android equivalent of the HD2</a>. HTC's CEO, Peter Chou, tells Forbes that "technically, we could make the HD2 an Android phone, but I have to take care of Windows Mobile." Qué?</p>
<p>He says they're working hard to "get excitement about Windows Mobile back." After <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374876/windows-mobile-65-review-theres-no-excuse-for-this">WinMo 6.5</a>, I guess someone needs to. HTC has said it's developing for the two platforms separately, so if there is to be no Android HD2, hopefully something better will come along.</p>
<p>If you're craving an Android/<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #1ghzsnapdragon" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/1ghzsnapdragon/">1GHz Snapdragon</a> pairing, look out for the upcoming <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5390700/android+based-sony-ericsson-xperia-x3-coming-nov-3">Sony Xperia X3</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5383180/acer-lets-slip-the-liquids-custom-android-interface-white+hot-specs">Acer Liquid</a>.</p>
<p>Chou also told Forbes that as a smaller company, HTC needs to be picky about what types of products it makes. The inference is that it's likely we won't see any HTC netbooks or eReaders any time soon. Good, because I'd rather see something as good as the <a href="http://us.gizmodo.com/search/HTC%20HD2">HD2</a> with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392059/a-visual-guide-to-android-20-so-much-nicer">Android 2.0</a>. And soon. Full interview at: [<a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/28/google-verizon-android-technology-wireless-htc.html">Forbes</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5392526/no-android-version-of-htc-hd2-after-all]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5392526]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1GHz Snapdragon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android 2.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc hd2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HTC Passion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[passion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon HTC Passion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon HTC Passion HTC HD2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon Passion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:50:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5392526&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How Motorola Stopped Sucking]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_drooooooid__006.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />So, uh, how did <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5234342/motorola-loses-another-231-million-still-praying-to-god-of-the-android-for-salvation">this company</a> make <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391825/motorola-droid-first-hands-on-its-a-terminator"><em>this</em> phone</a>? A happy accident, it <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/technology/companies/29moto.html?ref=technology">turns out</a>.</p>
<p>Right after taking the cursed reins of Motorola, then-incoming CEO <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sanjayjha" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sanjayjha/">Sanjay Jha</a> had a short town hall meeting and was accosted by a Moto engineer working on Android, Rick Osterloh, as he came off the stage. "By the end of that week, Mr. Osterloh was sitting on the corporate jet, flying with Mr. Jha back to California" to talk up Android, according to the NY Times' account.</p>
<p>Jha lopped off Moto's entire Symbian division in weeks, and when Windows Mobile hit delays, punted it entirely. Most impressively, I think, when it came time to pick out the brains of their new phones, Jha rejected a chip that his division had made when he was at Qualcomm, prior to Motorola, in favor of the TI OMAP chip that's in the Droid.</p>
<p>Funny thing about the Droid, while its aesthetic is dominated by a strict functionalism, it was actually even harder-edged before&mdash;Verizon asked Motorola to make it rounder and add the softer touch back so it didn't appeal solely to dudes. (Um, good job with that?) I'm just happy for Motorola that they weren't crushed into oblivion by the weight of their own ineptitude and might actually mount a real comeback. There's more to the story over at the Times: [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/technology/companies/29moto.html?ref=technology">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5392197/how-motorola-stopped-sucking]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5392197]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sanjay jha]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5392197&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[HTC Droid Eris Might Be the Cheapest Android Phone at $99]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/droiddesire2_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />A lot of attention has been lavished on <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391825/motorola-droid-first-hands-on-its-a-terminator">the Motorola Droid</a> today&mdash;and rightfully so&mdash;but it's merely the "cornerstone" of Verizon's Droid family. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388945/droid-may-be-a-series-not-just-a-phone-as-revealed-by-htc-droid-desire-specs">HTC's Droid Eris</a> is gonna be the cheap stepbrother, <a href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/htc/eris/general/HTC-Eris-price-will-be-99-/">at 99 bucks</a>.</p>

<p>Though it's been speculated that the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #droideris" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/droideris/">Droid Eris</a> will run Android 1.6 and sport a hard-to-get-excited-about 528MHz Qualcomm CPU, it would be the cheapest Android phone yet in the US. Verizon didn't mention it at all today, so we might be a touch skeptical of it making <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391071/motorola-droid-and-htc-droid-eris-launching-on-november-6th">that rumored Nov. 6 launch date</a>, but we'll see. [<a href="http://discuss.gdgt.com/htc/eris/general/HTC-Eris-price-will-be-99-/">gdgt</a> via <a href="http://twitter.com/ryanblock/status/5235052073">Twitter</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5392138/htc-droid-eris-might-be-the-cheapest-android-phone-at-99]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5392138]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc droid eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:54:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle VanHemert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5392138&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Charge Your Phone with the Power of the Sun and Hello Kitty]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/hellokittycharger.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_hellokittycharger.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hellokitty" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hellokitty/">Hello Kitty</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solarcharger" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solarcharger/">solar charger</a> strap provides the dual benefits of juicing up your phone and also making you look like a 13-year-old girl. It's a win-win! [<a href="http://item.rakuten.co.jp/keitai/239-117/">Rakuten</a> via <a href="http://www.tokyomango.com/tokyo_mango/2009/10/hello-kitty-solar-charger-.html">TokyoMango</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391935/charge-your-phone-with-the-power-of-the-sun-and-hello-kitty]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391935]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[solar charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hello kitty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391935&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Approves 'Asian Boobs' iPhone App, Just to Mess With Us]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/asianboobsapp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_asianboobsapp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Apple loves rejecting apps <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5114825/iphone-app-store-bans-book-app-for-naughty-language">for having swear words in them</a>, but a database of scantily clad Asian ladies? Approved! Who needs a rhyme or reason when you can be random and inscrutable? [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=324187335&mt=8">iTunes Link</a> via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/23/app-store-hypocrisy-update-asian-boobs-fine-top-seller-satirical-app-banned/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391980/apple-approves-asian-boobs-iphone-app-just-to-mess-with-us]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391980]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:11:14 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391980&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Droid Hits Verizon on November 6th for $200]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/droidtop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_droidtop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It'd have been difficult to leak Motorola's new Android piece any harder&mdash;we've already seen the hardware, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android-2.0">the software</a>, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388829/motorola-droid-reviewed-youre-going-to-love-it">even a review</a>&mdash;but now we know for <em>sure</em> sure: It's coming to Verizon on the 6th, for $200.</p>

<p>First off, Verizon's just confirmed that Droid is a <em>family</em> of phones, and that while this phone is the cornerstone, we should expect more. (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388945/droid-may-be-a-series-not-just-a-phone-as-revealed-by-htc-droid-desire-specs">AHEM</a>). This is the only one they're announcing now, so anyway: $200 is iPhone 3GS money, so it's good to hear that the specs are top-notch. It's got a 3.7inch screen at 480x854 pixels, a Cortex A8 processor, a 16GB SD card included, Bluetooth, GPS, a 5-megapixel camera and of course, the slide-out keyboard with d-pad. Right, we mostly knew this, so <em>what's new?</em> Well, there's a dock! Ok!<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/droidoff.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_droidoff.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
But the software's the real story here, and it's even better than we expected. With a new contacts app, multi-resolution support, a better camera app, and SMS searching , <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391043/android-20-official-its-the-android-weve-been-waiting-for">Android 2.0</a> is front and center, and the Droid will wear it proudly; this is a "Google Experience" device, so don't expect <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motoblur">Motoblur</a> here&mdash;which given the social networking integration in 2.0, and the refreshed interface, is probably for the best. Verizon wouldn't say whether or not the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android20" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android20/">Android 2.0</a> would be a Droid exclusive, refusing to confirm that it is, but also refusing to confirm that it <em>isn't</em>. Given that the marketing push for this phone is apparently the biggest in Verizon history, and how weirdly opaque Google's 2.0 release has been so far, I wouldn't doubt that former, at least for a few months.</p>
<p>And remember that Google <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391218/is-google-secretly-working-on-a-free-mobile-navigation-app">turn-by-turn nav app rumor</a>? It's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391408/google-maps-navigation-a-free-ass+kicking-turn+by+turn-mobile-app">totally true.</a> The voice-activated navigation feature will be free, which means if its <em>any</em> good at all, it could conceivably vaporize the entire nav app industry in a matter of months. Google Maps will also have a few new layers on Droid, with Wikipedia, transit and traffic overlays. Google Maps With Navigation will replace the trenchant VZ Navigation, which won't get an Android port. Verizon Visual Voicemail and MyVerizon services <em>will</em> hit Android eventually, but they're gonna take a little time.</p>
<p>Preorders are <a href="http://droiddoes.com/">open now</a> at Verizon's website, but just so you know&mdash;Verizon's $200 price is after a mail-in rebate, and a particularly weird one:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Customers will receive the rebate in the form of a debit card; upon receipt, customers may use the card as cash anywhere debit cards are accepted.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Seriously, guys, <em>stop</em>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Verizon Wireless DROID By Motorola: World's First Smartphone with Android™ 2.0</p>
<p>BASKING RIDGE, N.J., and LIBERTYVILLE, Ill. – High-speed Web browsing, voice-activated search, customizable large screen, access to thousands of Android applications and hundreds of widgets and the best 3G mobile network in the country: DROID by Motorola arrives on Nov. 6.</p>
<p>Verizon Wireless, the company with the nation's largest wireless 3G broadband network, and Motorola, Inc. (NYSE: MOT), a pioneer in the mobile industry, today unveiled DROID by Motorola, the first smartphone powered by Android™ 2.0. DROID by Motorola features the brainpower and breakneck speed of a modern smartphone, designed to outperform where other smartphones fall short.</p>
<p>"We're proud to work with Verizon Wireless and Google™ on the first smartphone to feature Android 2.0," said Sanjay Jha, co-chief executive officer of Motorola and chief executive officer of Motorola Mobile Devices. "DROID by Motorola delivers a rich consumer experience with warp-speed Web browsing, a mammoth screen, and Motorola's expertise in design and voice quality. Combined with Android's open, flexible graphical user interface and the power of Verizon Wireless' 3G network, DROID is a smartphone that simply doesn't compromise."</p>
<p>"This is an exciting announcement for Verizon Wireless, as the DROID by Motorola is the first device that we are bringing to market under our ground-breaking strategic partnership with Google," said John Stratton, executive vice president and chief marketing officer for Verizon Wireless. "DROID by Motorola gives customers a lifestyle device with access to more than 12,000 applications that will help them stay in touch, up to date and entertained, using the best 3G network in the country."</p>
<p>DROID by Motorola has a solid exterior, intelligent interior and is one of the thinnest full-QWERTY slider phones available. It is a no-fuss, high-tech, location-aware, voice-recognizing, over-the-air updating, multi-tasking machine – and it is available just in time for holiday wish lists.</p>
<p>With DROID by Motorola, you can:</p>
<p>· Zip through the Web: Access the Internet at 3G speeds via the nation's largest and most reliable 3G network or from any Wi-Fi hotspot. The multi-window HTML browser with a massive processor delivers the Web the way you expect.</p>
<p>· See it all in cinema-style: View the Web, e-mail, Google Maps™, videos and more in widescreen on a brilliant 3.7" high-resolution screen. Boasting a width of 854 pixels to reduce the need for side-to-side panning and more than 400,000 pixels total, DROID has more than twice that of the leading competitor.</p>
<p>· Run multiple applications at once: Customize your DROID with thousands of applications and hundreds of widgets available on Android Market™. Toggle back and forth between up to six applications at a time to juggle the universe and your apps.</p>
<p>· Perform Google Search™ at the speed of sound: Simply tell DROID what you're looking for using voice-activated search, and it will serve up Google search results based on your location. If you want more, simply type what you're looking for into the search bar on the home screen and DROID will also search content on your phone, such as apps and contacts, and the Web.</p>
<p>· Capture moments: Snap digital camera-quality photos with a 5 megapixel camera loaded with the works, such as a dual-LED flash, AutoFocus and image stabilization, or capture your friend's antics in 16 million colors with DVD-quality video capture and playback. Store it all on the included 16 GB memory card, so you always have it on hand.</p>
<p>· Multi-task like a master: Keep tabs on all your messages with integrated Gmail™ and Exchange e-mail pushed directly to you, but don't let them get in your way. With the handy Android notification panel, go straight to the message or simply ignore it, and get back to the task at hand. And, a smart dictionary learns as you type and automatically includes your contacts.</p>
<p>· Get where you need to go with Google Maps Navigation (Beta): DROID is the first device with Google Maps Navigation, providing turn-by-turn voice guidance as a free feature of Google Maps. It's powered by Google and connected to the Internet. Use voice shortcuts and simply say "Navigate to [your destination]," and you'll be on your way. See live traffic, use Street View or satellite imagery to view your route, and get access to the most recent maps and business information from Google Maps without ever needing to update your device.</p>
<p>Pre-loaded Applications and Enhancements to Google Mobile Services:</p>
<p>· Google Maps: With layers in Google Maps, view geographic information, such as My Maps, Wikipedia, and transit lines, right on the map.</p>
<p>· Gmail: Multiple accounts support and undo for common operations.</p>
<p>· YouTube™: One-touch recording and playback from homescreen widget or app, one-touch sharing with friends, and the ability to view your own uploaded videos and high-resolution videos.</p>
<p>· Google Talk™: Easily switch between chats, search your chat history, and preview pictures and videos sent by links.</p>
<p>· Android Market: Browse and download applications created by third-party developers.</p>
<p>· Calendar: Ability to see who has R.S.V.P.'d to your meeting invitations.</p>
<p>· Amazon MP3 Store: Download the latest tracks over the air.</p>
<p>· Verizon Wireless Visual Voice Mail: Delete, reply and forward voice mail messages without having to listen to prior messages or voice instructions.</p>
<p>Pricing and Availability:</p>
<p>· DROID by Motorola will be available in the United States exclusively at Verizon Wireless Communications Stores and online on Friday, Nov. 6, for $199.99 with a new two-year customer agreement after a $100 mail-in rebate. Customers will receive the rebate in the form of a debit card; upon receipt, customers may use the card as cash anywhere debit cards are accepted.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391735/motorola-droid-hits-verizon-on-november-6th-for-200]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391735]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android 2.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moto droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:50:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391735&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Amazon Chops Garmin Nuvifone G60 Price By Two Thirds In the First Month]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_Garmin_nuvifone_top_shot_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Our recommended price for the Nuvifone G60 was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374720/garmin-nuvifone-g60-gps-phone-review-do-not-buy">death</a>, payable by the handset, not the prospective buyer. Until that can be arranged, though, Amazon's plunging <a href="http://garmin.blogs.com/my_weblog/2009/10/nuvifone-g60-adds-location-to.html">$200 discount</a> (on a $300 phone!) will have to do.</p>

<p>To recap the only review we've ever written that didn't even have a "Good" section, the Nuvifone was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374720/garmin-nuvifone-g60-gps-phone-review-do-not-buy">a failure</a> in about every way that the once-hot handset could've been: It's crashy, it's got a clunky resistive screen, the browser is really, really tough to use, and camera <em>sometimes</em> works, there's a $5/month charge for basic services like weather, traffic and local events, the battery life is horrendous, and the OS acts like a navigation unit firmware with tumorous telecommunications outgrowth. And oh god, that <em>price</em>: $300 with an AT&T contract, which is about how much it'd cost you to buy one iPhone 3G with TomTom <em>and</em> Navigon apps.</p>
<p>So yeah, a price drop was all but inevitable, but it's heartening to see it happen this soon, even if not by Garmin's hand. Next stop: 0. [<a href="http://garmin.blogs.com/my_weblog/2009/10/nuvifone-g60-adds-location-to.html">Amazon</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/garmin-nuvifone-g60-going-for-100-on-amazon/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391680/amazon-chops-garmin-nuvifone-g60-price-by-two-thirds-in-the-first-month]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391680]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[garmin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g60]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[garmin nuvifone g60]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nuvifone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[turn-by-turn]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:43:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391680&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chris Ware's New Yorker Cover Is Wonderful]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/chriswarenewyorker.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_chriswarenewyorker.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's tough to not love <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #chrisware" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/chrisware/">Chris Ware</a>'s Halloween cover for the <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newyorker" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/newyorker/">New Yorker</a></i>, isn't it? [<a href="http://whythatsdelightful.wordpress.com/">Why, That's Delightful!</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/27/chris-wares-new-york.html">Boing Boing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391213/chris-wares-new-yorker-cover-is-wonderful]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391213]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chris ware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new yorker]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:32:45 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391213&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Droid and HTC Droid Eris Launching on November 6th]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/verizon-droid-eris.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_verizon-droid-eris.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Boy Genius has it on good authority that both the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/droid/">Motorola Droid</a> and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388945/droid-may-be-a-series-not-just-a-phone-as-revealed-by-htc-droid-desire-specs">HTC Droid Eris</a> will launch on Verizon November 6th&mdash;a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386954/motorola-droid-probably-going-on-sale-november-9th">few days earlier than previously expected</a>. Look for an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388108/motorola-droid-unexpectedly-appears-on-motorolas-site-ahead-of-schedule">official announcement</a> tomorrow. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/27/motorola-droid-and-htc-droid-eris-launching-november-6th-on-verizon/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391071/motorola-droid-and-htc-droid-eris-launching-on-november-6th]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391071]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc droid eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:33:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391071&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
